法院判决中的性别偏见检测:巴西案例研究

Raysa Benatti, Fabiana Severi, Sandra Avila, Esther Luna Colombini
{"title":"法院判决中的性别偏见检测:巴西案例研究","authors":"Raysa Benatti, Fabiana Severi, Sandra Avila, Esther Luna Colombini","doi":"arxiv-2406.00393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data derived from the realm of the social sciences is often produced in\ndigital text form, which motivates its use as a source for natural language\nprocessing methods. Researchers and practitioners have developed and relied on\nartificial intelligence techniques to collect, process, and analyze documents\nin the legal field, especially for tasks such as text summarization and\nclassification. While increasing procedural efficiency is often the primary\nmotivation behind natural language processing in the field, several works have\nproposed solutions for human rights-related issues, such as assessment of\npublic policy and institutional social settings. One such issue is the presence\nof gender biases in court decisions, which has been largely studied in social\nsciences fields; biased institutional responses to gender-based violence are a\nviolation of international human rights dispositions since they prevent gender\nminorities from accessing rights and hamper their dignity. Natural language\nprocessing-based approaches can help detect these biases on a larger scale.\nStill, the development and use of such tools require researchers and\npractitioners to be mindful of legal and ethical aspects concerning data\nsharing and use, reproducibility, domain expertise, and value-charged choices.\nIn this work, we (a) present an experimental framework developed to\nautomatically detect gender biases in court decisions issued in Brazilian\nPortuguese and (b) describe and elaborate on features we identify to be\ncritical in such a technology, given its proposed use as a support tool for\nresearch and assessment of court~activity.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Raysa Benatti, Fabiana Severi, Sandra Avila, Esther Luna Colombini\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2406.00393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data derived from the realm of the social sciences is often produced in\\ndigital text form, which motivates its use as a source for natural language\\nprocessing methods. Researchers and practitioners have developed and relied on\\nartificial intelligence techniques to collect, process, and analyze documents\\nin the legal field, especially for tasks such as text summarization and\\nclassification. While increasing procedural efficiency is often the primary\\nmotivation behind natural language processing in the field, several works have\\nproposed solutions for human rights-related issues, such as assessment of\\npublic policy and institutional social settings. One such issue is the presence\\nof gender biases in court decisions, which has been largely studied in social\\nsciences fields; biased institutional responses to gender-based violence are a\\nviolation of international human rights dispositions since they prevent gender\\nminorities from accessing rights and hamper their dignity. Natural language\\nprocessing-based approaches can help detect these biases on a larger scale.\\nStill, the development and use of such tools require researchers and\\npractitioners to be mindful of legal and ethical aspects concerning data\\nsharing and use, reproducibility, domain expertise, and value-charged choices.\\nIn this work, we (a) present an experimental framework developed to\\nautomatically detect gender biases in court decisions issued in Brazilian\\nPortuguese and (b) describe and elaborate on features we identify to be\\ncritical in such a technology, given its proposed use as a support tool for\\nresearch and assessment of court~activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.00393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.00393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自社会科学领域的数据通常以数字文本形式生成,这促使其成为自然语言处理方法的来源。研究人员和从业人员已经开发并依赖人工智能技术来收集、处理和分析法律领域的文档,尤其是文本摘要和分类等任务。虽然提高程序效率往往是该领域自然语言处理背后的主要动机,但也有一些作品针对人权相关问题提出了解决方案,如评估公共政策和机构社会环境。其中一个问题是法院判决中存在的性别偏见,社会科学领域对这一问题进行了大量研究;对基于性别的暴力做出有偏见的制度性回应违反了国际人权规定,因为这妨碍了性别少数群体获得权利,损害了他们的尊严。不过,开发和使用此类工具需要研究人员和从业人员注意有关数据共享和使用、可重复性、领域专业知识和价值选择等方面的法律和伦理问题。在这项工作中,我们(a)介绍了一个实验框架,该框架旨在自动检测以巴西葡萄牙语发布的法院判决中的性别偏见;(b)描述并阐述了我们认为此类技术的关键特征,因为我们建议将其用作研究和评估法院活动的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study
Data derived from the realm of the social sciences is often produced in digital text form, which motivates its use as a source for natural language processing methods. Researchers and practitioners have developed and relied on artificial intelligence techniques to collect, process, and analyze documents in the legal field, especially for tasks such as text summarization and classification. While increasing procedural efficiency is often the primary motivation behind natural language processing in the field, several works have proposed solutions for human rights-related issues, such as assessment of public policy and institutional social settings. One such issue is the presence of gender biases in court decisions, which has been largely studied in social sciences fields; biased institutional responses to gender-based violence are a violation of international human rights dispositions since they prevent gender minorities from accessing rights and hamper their dignity. Natural language processing-based approaches can help detect these biases on a larger scale. Still, the development and use of such tools require researchers and practitioners to be mindful of legal and ethical aspects concerning data sharing and use, reproducibility, domain expertise, and value-charged choices. In this work, we (a) present an experimental framework developed to automatically detect gender biases in court decisions issued in Brazilian Portuguese and (b) describe and elaborate on features we identify to be critical in such a technology, given its proposed use as a support tool for research and assessment of court~activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信