使用新型 TODIFFA-MCDM 框架评估大型企业的深度学习软件工具

IF 5.2 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zoran Gligorić , Ömer Faruk Görçün , Miloš Gligorić , Dragan Pamucar , Vladimir Simic , Hande Küçükönder
{"title":"使用新型 TODIFFA-MCDM 框架评估大型企业的深度学习软件工具","authors":"Zoran Gligorić ,&nbsp;Ömer Faruk Görçün ,&nbsp;Miloš Gligorić ,&nbsp;Dragan Pamucar ,&nbsp;Vladimir Simic ,&nbsp;Hande Küçükönder","doi":"10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep learning (DL) is one of the most promising technological developments emerging in the fourth industrial revolution era for businesses to improve processes, increase efficiency, and reduce errors. Accordingly, hierarchical learning software selection is one of the most critical decision-making problems in integrating neural network applications into business models. However, selecting appropriate reinforcement learning software for integrating deep learning applications into enterprises’ business models takes much work for decision-makers. There are several reasons for this: first, practitioners’ limited knowledge and experience of DL makes it difficult for decision-makers to adapt this technology into their enterprises’ business model and significantly increases complex uncertainties. Secondly, according to the authors’ knowledge, no study in the literature addresses deep structured learning solutions with the help of MCDM approaches. Consequently, making inferences concerning criteria that should be considered in an evaluation process is impossible by considering the studies in the relevant literature. Considering these gaps, this study presents a novel decision-making approach developed by the authors. It involves the combination of two new decision-making approaches, MAXC (MAXimum of Criterion) and TODIFFA (the total differential of alternative), which were developed to solve current decision-making problems. When the most important advantages of this model are considered, it associates objective and subjective approaches and eliminates some critical limitations of these methodologies. Besides, it has an easily followable algorithm without the need for advanced mathematical knowledge for practitioners and provides highly stable and reliable results in solving complex decision-making problems. Another novelty of the study is that the criteria are determined with a long-term negotiation process that is part of comprehensive fieldwork with specialists. When the conclusions obtained using this model are briefly reviewed, the C2 “Data Availability and Quality” criterion is the most influential in selecting deep learning software. The C7 “Time Constraints” criterion follows the most influential factor. Remarkably, prior research has overlooked the correlation between the performance of Deep Learning (DL) platforms and the quality and accessibility of data. The findings of this study underscore the necessity for DL platform developers to devise solutions to enable DL platforms to operate effectively, notwithstanding the availability of clean, high-quality, and adequate data. Finally, the robustness check carried out to test the validity of the proposed model confirms the accuracy and robustness of the results obtained by implementing the suggested model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131915782400168X/pdfft?md5=35294d2abb229ca991ec30d8b2daf9ef&pid=1-s2.0-S131915782400168X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the deep learning software tools for large-scale enterprises using a novel TODIFFA-MCDM framework\",\"authors\":\"Zoran Gligorić ,&nbsp;Ömer Faruk Görçün ,&nbsp;Miloš Gligorić ,&nbsp;Dragan Pamucar ,&nbsp;Vladimir Simic ,&nbsp;Hande Küçükönder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Deep learning (DL) is one of the most promising technological developments emerging in the fourth industrial revolution era for businesses to improve processes, increase efficiency, and reduce errors. Accordingly, hierarchical learning software selection is one of the most critical decision-making problems in integrating neural network applications into business models. However, selecting appropriate reinforcement learning software for integrating deep learning applications into enterprises’ business models takes much work for decision-makers. There are several reasons for this: first, practitioners’ limited knowledge and experience of DL makes it difficult for decision-makers to adapt this technology into their enterprises’ business model and significantly increases complex uncertainties. Secondly, according to the authors’ knowledge, no study in the literature addresses deep structured learning solutions with the help of MCDM approaches. Consequently, making inferences concerning criteria that should be considered in an evaluation process is impossible by considering the studies in the relevant literature. Considering these gaps, this study presents a novel decision-making approach developed by the authors. It involves the combination of two new decision-making approaches, MAXC (MAXimum of Criterion) and TODIFFA (the total differential of alternative), which were developed to solve current decision-making problems. When the most important advantages of this model are considered, it associates objective and subjective approaches and eliminates some critical limitations of these methodologies. Besides, it has an easily followable algorithm without the need for advanced mathematical knowledge for practitioners and provides highly stable and reliable results in solving complex decision-making problems. Another novelty of the study is that the criteria are determined with a long-term negotiation process that is part of comprehensive fieldwork with specialists. When the conclusions obtained using this model are briefly reviewed, the C2 “Data Availability and Quality” criterion is the most influential in selecting deep learning software. The C7 “Time Constraints” criterion follows the most influential factor. Remarkably, prior research has overlooked the correlation between the performance of Deep Learning (DL) platforms and the quality and accessibility of data. The findings of this study underscore the necessity for DL platform developers to devise solutions to enable DL platforms to operate effectively, notwithstanding the availability of clean, high-quality, and adequate data. Finally, the robustness check carried out to test the validity of the proposed model confirms the accuracy and robustness of the results obtained by implementing the suggested model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131915782400168X/pdfft?md5=35294d2abb229ca991ec30d8b2daf9ef&pid=1-s2.0-S131915782400168X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131915782400168X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131915782400168X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度学习(DL)是第四次工业革命时代出现的最有前途的技术发展之一,可帮助企业改善流程、提高效率和减少错误。因此,在将神经网络应用集成到商业模式中时,分层学习软件的选择是最关键的决策问题之一。然而,如何选择合适的强化学习软件,将深度学习应用融入企业的商业模式,却让决策者费尽心思。究其原因有以下几点:首先,从业人员对强化学习的了解和经验有限,导致决策者很难将这一技术应用到企业的商业模式中,并大大增加了复杂的不确定性。其次,据作者所知,文献中没有任何研究涉及借助 MCDM 方法的深度结构化学习解决方案。因此,考虑到相关文献中的研究,不可能对评估过程中应考虑的标准做出推断。考虑到这些差距,本研究提出了作者开发的一种新型决策方法。该方法结合了两种新的决策方法,即 MAXC(标准最大值)和 TODIFFA(备选方案总差值),这两种方法是为了解决当前的决策问题而开发的。该模型最重要的优点是将客观方法和主观方法结合起来,消除了这些方法的一些关键局限性。此外,该模型的算法简单易学,从业人员无需掌握高深的数学知识,在解决复杂的决策问题时可提供高度稳定可靠的结果。这项研究的另一个新颖之处在于,标准是在与专家进行全面的实地考察后,通过长期的协商过程确定的。简要回顾使用该模型得出的结论,C2 "数据可用性和质量 "标准对选择深度学习软件的影响最大。C7 "时间限制 "标准紧随其后,是影响最大的因素。值得注意的是,之前的研究忽略了深度学习(DL)平台的性能与数据质量和可访问性之间的相关性。本研究的结论强调,尽管存在干净、高质量和充足的数据,深度学习平台开发人员仍有必要制定解决方案,使深度学习平台能够有效运行。最后,为测试建议模型的有效性而进行的稳健性检查证实了实施建议模型所获得结果的准确性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the deep learning software tools for large-scale enterprises using a novel TODIFFA-MCDM framework

Deep learning (DL) is one of the most promising technological developments emerging in the fourth industrial revolution era for businesses to improve processes, increase efficiency, and reduce errors. Accordingly, hierarchical learning software selection is one of the most critical decision-making problems in integrating neural network applications into business models. However, selecting appropriate reinforcement learning software for integrating deep learning applications into enterprises’ business models takes much work for decision-makers. There are several reasons for this: first, practitioners’ limited knowledge and experience of DL makes it difficult for decision-makers to adapt this technology into their enterprises’ business model and significantly increases complex uncertainties. Secondly, according to the authors’ knowledge, no study in the literature addresses deep structured learning solutions with the help of MCDM approaches. Consequently, making inferences concerning criteria that should be considered in an evaluation process is impossible by considering the studies in the relevant literature. Considering these gaps, this study presents a novel decision-making approach developed by the authors. It involves the combination of two new decision-making approaches, MAXC (MAXimum of Criterion) and TODIFFA (the total differential of alternative), which were developed to solve current decision-making problems. When the most important advantages of this model are considered, it associates objective and subjective approaches and eliminates some critical limitations of these methodologies. Besides, it has an easily followable algorithm without the need for advanced mathematical knowledge for practitioners and provides highly stable and reliable results in solving complex decision-making problems. Another novelty of the study is that the criteria are determined with a long-term negotiation process that is part of comprehensive fieldwork with specialists. When the conclusions obtained using this model are briefly reviewed, the C2 “Data Availability and Quality” criterion is the most influential in selecting deep learning software. The C7 “Time Constraints” criterion follows the most influential factor. Remarkably, prior research has overlooked the correlation between the performance of Deep Learning (DL) platforms and the quality and accessibility of data. The findings of this study underscore the necessity for DL platform developers to devise solutions to enable DL platforms to operate effectively, notwithstanding the availability of clean, high-quality, and adequate data. Finally, the robustness check carried out to test the validity of the proposed model confirms the accuracy and robustness of the results obtained by implementing the suggested model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
656
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: In 2022 the Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences will become an author paid open access journal. Authors who submit their manuscript after October 31st 2021 will be asked to pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) after acceptance of their paper to make their work immediately, permanently, and freely accessible to all. The Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences is a refereed, international journal that covers all aspects of both foundations of computer and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信