无代码机器学习:验证用于锁骨骨折分类的方法

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Giridhar Dasegowda , James Yuichi Sato , Daniel C. Elton , Emiliano Garza-Frias , Thomas Schultz , Christopher P. Bridge , Bernardo C. Bizzo , Mannudeep K. Kalra , Keith J. Dreyer
{"title":"无代码机器学习:验证用于锁骨骨折分类的方法","authors":"Giridhar Dasegowda ,&nbsp;James Yuichi Sato ,&nbsp;Daniel C. Elton ,&nbsp;Emiliano Garza-Frias ,&nbsp;Thomas Schultz ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Bridge ,&nbsp;Bernardo C. Bizzo ,&nbsp;Mannudeep K. Kalra ,&nbsp;Keith J. Dreyer","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We created an infrastructure for no code machine learning (NML) platform for non-programming physicians to create NML model. We tested the platform by creating an NML model for classifying radiographs for the presence and absence of clavicle fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our IRB-approved retrospective study included 4135 clavicle radiographs from 2039 patients (mean age 52 ± 20 years, F:M 1022:1017) from 13 hospitals. Each patient had two-view clavicle radiographs with axial and anterior-posterior projections. The positive radiographs had either displaced or non-displaced clavicle fractures. We configured the NML platform to automatically retrieve the eligible exams using the series' unique identification from the hospital virtual network archive via web access to DICOM Objects. The platform trained a model until the validation loss plateaus. Once the testing was complete, the platform provided the receiver operating characteristics curve and confusion matrix for estimating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The NML platform successfully retrieved 3917 radiographs (3917/4135, 94.7 %) and parsed them for creating a ML classifier with 2151 radiographs in the training, 100 radiographs for validation, and 1666 radiographs in testing datasets (772 radiographs with clavicle fracture, 894 without clavicle fracture). The network identified clavicle fracture with 90 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 88 % accuracy with AUC of 0.95 (confidence interval 0.94–0.96).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A NML platform can help physicians create and test machine learning models from multicenter imaging datasets such as the one in our study for classifying radiographs based on the presence of clavicle fracture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No code machine learning: validating the approach on use-case for classifying clavicle fractures\",\"authors\":\"Giridhar Dasegowda ,&nbsp;James Yuichi Sato ,&nbsp;Daniel C. Elton ,&nbsp;Emiliano Garza-Frias ,&nbsp;Thomas Schultz ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Bridge ,&nbsp;Bernardo C. Bizzo ,&nbsp;Mannudeep K. Kalra ,&nbsp;Keith J. Dreyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We created an infrastructure for no code machine learning (NML) platform for non-programming physicians to create NML model. We tested the platform by creating an NML model for classifying radiographs for the presence and absence of clavicle fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our IRB-approved retrospective study included 4135 clavicle radiographs from 2039 patients (mean age 52 ± 20 years, F:M 1022:1017) from 13 hospitals. Each patient had two-view clavicle radiographs with axial and anterior-posterior projections. The positive radiographs had either displaced or non-displaced clavicle fractures. We configured the NML platform to automatically retrieve the eligible exams using the series' unique identification from the hospital virtual network archive via web access to DICOM Objects. The platform trained a model until the validation loss plateaus. Once the testing was complete, the platform provided the receiver operating characteristics curve and confusion matrix for estimating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The NML platform successfully retrieved 3917 radiographs (3917/4135, 94.7 %) and parsed them for creating a ML classifier with 2151 radiographs in the training, 100 radiographs for validation, and 1666 radiographs in testing datasets (772 radiographs with clavicle fracture, 894 without clavicle fracture). The network identified clavicle fracture with 90 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 88 % accuracy with AUC of 0.95 (confidence interval 0.94–0.96).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A NML platform can help physicians create and test machine learning models from multicenter imaging datasets such as the one in our study for classifying radiographs based on the presence of clavicle fracture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124001372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124001372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们创建了无代码机器学习(NML)平台的基础设施,供不会编程的医生创建 NML 模型。我们通过创建一个 NML 模型对该平台进行了测试,该模型用于对射线照片进行分类,以确定是否存在锁骨骨折。方法我们经 IRB 批准的回顾性研究包括来自 13 家医院的 2039 名患者(平均年龄为 52 ± 20 岁,男女比例为 1022:1017)的 4135 张锁骨射线照片。每位患者的锁骨X光片都有轴向和前后投影两个视角。正片显示锁骨骨折移位或未移位。我们配置了 NML 平台,通过网络访问 DICOM 对象,使用系列的唯一标识从医院虚拟网络档案中自动检索符合条件的检查。该平台对模型进行训练,直到验证损失趋于稳定。结果NML平台成功检索到3917张X光片(3917/4135,94.7%),并对其进行解析,创建了一个ML分类器,其中2151张X光片为训练数据集,100张X光片为验证数据集,1666张X光片为测试数据集(772张X光片有锁骨骨折,894张无锁骨骨折)。该网络识别锁骨骨折的灵敏度为 90%,特异度为 87%,准确度为 88%,AUC 为 0.95(置信区间为 0.94-0.96)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No code machine learning: validating the approach on use-case for classifying clavicle fractures

Purpose

We created an infrastructure for no code machine learning (NML) platform for non-programming physicians to create NML model. We tested the platform by creating an NML model for classifying radiographs for the presence and absence of clavicle fractures.

Methods

Our IRB-approved retrospective study included 4135 clavicle radiographs from 2039 patients (mean age 52 ± 20 years, F:M 1022:1017) from 13 hospitals. Each patient had two-view clavicle radiographs with axial and anterior-posterior projections. The positive radiographs had either displaced or non-displaced clavicle fractures. We configured the NML platform to automatically retrieve the eligible exams using the series' unique identification from the hospital virtual network archive via web access to DICOM Objects. The platform trained a model until the validation loss plateaus. Once the testing was complete, the platform provided the receiver operating characteristics curve and confusion matrix for estimating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results

The NML platform successfully retrieved 3917 radiographs (3917/4135, 94.7 %) and parsed them for creating a ML classifier with 2151 radiographs in the training, 100 radiographs for validation, and 1666 radiographs in testing datasets (772 radiographs with clavicle fracture, 894 without clavicle fracture). The network identified clavicle fracture with 90 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 88 % accuracy with AUC of 0.95 (confidence interval 0.94–0.96).

Conclusion

A NML platform can help physicians create and test machine learning models from multicenter imaging datasets such as the one in our study for classifying radiographs based on the presence of clavicle fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信