{"title":"传统奴隶制和民主化:洞察印度尼西亚松巴岛农村地区种姓间人力资本差异","authors":"Umbu Reku Raya , Budy P. Resosudarmo","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by examining the impact of prevailing traditional slavery institutions and democratization processes on human capital development. In our pursuit, we conducted a residential survey in Sumba Island, Indonesia. Notably, despite democratization efforts since the 1950s, the traditional slavery institution, deeply entrenched in the ancient Austronesian ranking system, remains prevalent. This system classifies individuals into three hereditary tiers: nobles, commoners, and slaves. Based on the premise that caste designation is random and exogenous, we utilized an ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation approach, incorporating natal clan and cohort fixed effects. Our findings underscore the distinct advantage in human capital that individuals of the noble rank hold over their counterparts in the lower ranks, i.e. commoners and slaves. However, we also highlight the promise of ongoing democratization in bridging the human capital gaps between nobles and slaves, while simultaneously enhancing the potential for commoners to improve their human capital outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"16 5","pages":"Article 100011"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000398/pdfft?md5=ac816e399eadec864624d22fdc66af56&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional slavery institutions and democratization: Insights into intercaste human capital disparities in Sumba Island’s rural areas, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Umbu Reku Raya , Budy P. Resosudarmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by examining the impact of prevailing traditional slavery institutions and democratization processes on human capital development. In our pursuit, we conducted a residential survey in Sumba Island, Indonesia. Notably, despite democratization efforts since the 1950s, the traditional slavery institution, deeply entrenched in the ancient Austronesian ranking system, remains prevalent. This system classifies individuals into three hereditary tiers: nobles, commoners, and slaves. Based on the premise that caste designation is random and exogenous, we utilized an ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation approach, incorporating natal clan and cohort fixed effects. Our findings underscore the distinct advantage in human capital that individuals of the noble rank hold over their counterparts in the lower ranks, i.e. commoners and slaves. However, we also highlight the promise of ongoing democratization in bridging the human capital gaps between nobles and slaves, while simultaneously enhancing the potential for commoners to improve their human capital outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000398/pdfft?md5=ac816e399eadec864624d22fdc66af56&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224000398-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Traditional slavery institutions and democratization: Insights into intercaste human capital disparities in Sumba Island’s rural areas, Indonesia
This study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by examining the impact of prevailing traditional slavery institutions and democratization processes on human capital development. In our pursuit, we conducted a residential survey in Sumba Island, Indonesia. Notably, despite democratization efforts since the 1950s, the traditional slavery institution, deeply entrenched in the ancient Austronesian ranking system, remains prevalent. This system classifies individuals into three hereditary tiers: nobles, commoners, and slaves. Based on the premise that caste designation is random and exogenous, we utilized an ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation approach, incorporating natal clan and cohort fixed effects. Our findings underscore the distinct advantage in human capital that individuals of the noble rank hold over their counterparts in the lower ranks, i.e. commoners and slaves. However, we also highlight the promise of ongoing democratization in bridging the human capital gaps between nobles and slaves, while simultaneously enhancing the potential for commoners to improve their human capital outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.