在胰十二指肠切除术后采用网膜卷起技术预防术后胰瘘的效果。

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.24-016
Sisira Jayaratnam, Cherring Tandup, Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Kailash ChKurdia, Ashish Gupta, Lileswar Kaman
{"title":"在胰十二指肠切除术后采用网膜卷起技术预防术后胰瘘的效果。","authors":"Sisira Jayaratnam, Cherring Tandup, Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Kailash ChKurdia, Ashish Gupta, Lileswar Kaman","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (<i>p</i> = 0.667), abdominal pain (<i>p</i> = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.97) and POD3 (<i>p</i> = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.99) and grade B (<i>p</i> = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (<i>p</i> = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Sisira Jayaratnam, Cherring Tandup, Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Kailash ChKurdia, Ashish Gupta, Lileswar Kaman\",\"doi\":\"10.14701/ahbps.24-016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (<i>p</i> = 0.667), abdominal pain (<i>p</i> = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.97) and POD3 (<i>p</i> = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.99) and grade B (<i>p</i> = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (<i>p</i> = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341888/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胰十二指肠切除术(PD)越来越频繁。胰空肠吻合术(PJ)渗漏是患者预后的主要决定因素。在胰空肠周围制作网膜瓣可能会改善术后效果:方法:计划在昌迪加尔的 PGIMER 进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验。符合标准的 58 名患者被纳入研究。结果:A组患者的平均年龄为18岁,B组患者的平均年龄为18岁:A组患者的平均年龄为(57.1±14.3)岁,B组患者的平均年龄为(51.2±10.7)岁。两组患者的黄疸(P = 0.667)、腹痛(P = 0.69)和并发症相同。B 组患者的体重指数较高,为 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2(p = 0.03)。总胆管直径(12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm,p = 0.13)和胰管直径(4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm,p = 0.91)相当。B 组的术中失血量(毫升)明显更高(233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14,p = 0.04)。术后第 1 天(POD)(P = 0.97)和第 3 天(P = 0.92)的引流液淀粉酶水平相当。术后胰瘘(POPF)A级(p ≥ 0.99)和B级(p = 0.54)的发生率相当。术后平均住院时间相似(p = 0.89):结论:网膜包裹术可以在不增加手术复杂性的情况下进行。结论:网膜包裹术可以在不增加手术复杂度的情况下进行,但其在预防 POPF 和发病率方面的作用仍不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Backgrounds/aims: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.

Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (p = 0.667), abdominal pain (p = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2 (p = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, p = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, p = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, p = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = 0.97) and POD3 (p = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (p ≥ 0.99) and grade B (p = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (p = 0.89).

Conclusions: An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信