简短执行语言筛查:急性至亚急性卒中早期的敏感性和特异性。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mia R Phillips, Jessica Byrne, Emily C Gibson, Casey Gilbert, Lucy Ford, Georgia Marsh, Jessica Chow, Gail A Robinson
{"title":"简短执行语言筛查:急性至亚急性卒中早期的敏感性和特异性。","authors":"Mia R Phillips, Jessica Byrne, Emily C Gibson, Casey Gilbert, Lucy Ford, Georgia Marsh, Jessica Chow, Gail A Robinson","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2356412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Propositional language and underlying executive functions can be impaired post-stroke and affect communication and quality of life. Current stroke screening tools are largely tailored to patients with aphasia, being either non-verbal or focussed on core language skills such as naming and repetition. The Brief Executive Language Screening Test (BELS) is a newly developed cognitive screening tool that assesses memory, oral apraxia, core language, as well as propositional language and associated executive functions that can be impacted and overlooked in stroke patients without aphasia. This study examines BELS sensitivity and specificity, and performance in acute to early sub-acute stroke relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional BELS data from 88 acute left and right hemisphere stroke patients (within 7 weeks of stroke) and 116 age-matched healthy controls were compared using independent samples t-tests. ROC Curve Analysis was performed to determine a cutoff score for the BELS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left and right stroke patients were reduced on all propositional language subtests, and executive function subtests of inhibition, strategy, and selection. Differences were also observed for Oral Apraxia, Naming, and Memory. By contrast, Word Comprehension and Repetition, and Sentence Completion Initiation (after corrections applied) did not differ between groups. A total BELS score of 79.25/100 was highly sensitive (.89) and specific (.89) when classifying stroke patients and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BELS is brief, sensitive, suitable for bedside administration, and can aid in detection and rehabilitation of subtle executive language impairments. This in turn will help improve relationships and quality of life post-stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The brief executive language screen: sensitivity and specificity in acute to early sub-acute stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Mia R Phillips, Jessica Byrne, Emily C Gibson, Casey Gilbert, Lucy Ford, Georgia Marsh, Jessica Chow, Gail A Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2356412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Propositional language and underlying executive functions can be impaired post-stroke and affect communication and quality of life. Current stroke screening tools are largely tailored to patients with aphasia, being either non-verbal or focussed on core language skills such as naming and repetition. The Brief Executive Language Screening Test (BELS) is a newly developed cognitive screening tool that assesses memory, oral apraxia, core language, as well as propositional language and associated executive functions that can be impacted and overlooked in stroke patients without aphasia. This study examines BELS sensitivity and specificity, and performance in acute to early sub-acute stroke relative to controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional BELS data from 88 acute left and right hemisphere stroke patients (within 7 weeks of stroke) and 116 age-matched healthy controls were compared using independent samples t-tests. ROC Curve Analysis was performed to determine a cutoff score for the BELS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left and right stroke patients were reduced on all propositional language subtests, and executive function subtests of inhibition, strategy, and selection. Differences were also observed for Oral Apraxia, Naming, and Memory. By contrast, Word Comprehension and Repetition, and Sentence Completion Initiation (after corrections applied) did not differ between groups. A total BELS score of 79.25/100 was highly sensitive (.89) and specific (.89) when classifying stroke patients and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BELS is brief, sensitive, suitable for bedside administration, and can aid in detection and rehabilitation of subtle executive language impairments. This in turn will help improve relationships and quality of life post-stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2356412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2356412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言脑卒中后,命题语言和潜在的执行功能会受损,影响交流和生活质量。目前的脑卒中筛查工具主要是为失语症患者量身定做的,要么不使用语言,要么侧重于核心语言技能,如命名和复述。简短执行语言筛查测试(BELS)是一种新开发的认知筛查工具,可评估无失语症的中风患者的记忆力、口语障碍、核心语言以及命题语言和相关执行功能,这些功能可能会受到影响并被忽视。本研究探讨了 BELS 的敏感性和特异性,以及与对照组相比,在急性中风到早期亚急性中风中的表现:方法:使用独立样本 t 检验比较 88 名急性左右半球中风患者(中风后 7 周内)和 116 名年龄匹配的健康对照者的横断面 BELS 数据。通过 ROC 曲线分析确定 BELS 的临界值:结果:左侧和右侧脑卒中患者在所有命题语言分测验以及抑制、策略和选择等执行功能分测验中的成绩均有所下降。在口语障碍、命名和记忆方面也发现了差异。相比之下,单词理解和复述以及句子完成启动(经修正后)在组间没有差异。在对脑卒中患者和健康对照组进行分类时,BELS 总分 79.25/100 具有高度敏感性(0.89)和特异性(0.89):结论:BELS 简短、灵敏,适合在床边使用,有助于发现和康复细微的执行语言障碍。这反过来将有助于改善中风后的人际关系和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The brief executive language screen: sensitivity and specificity in acute to early sub-acute stroke.

Introduction: Propositional language and underlying executive functions can be impaired post-stroke and affect communication and quality of life. Current stroke screening tools are largely tailored to patients with aphasia, being either non-verbal or focussed on core language skills such as naming and repetition. The Brief Executive Language Screening Test (BELS) is a newly developed cognitive screening tool that assesses memory, oral apraxia, core language, as well as propositional language and associated executive functions that can be impacted and overlooked in stroke patients without aphasia. This study examines BELS sensitivity and specificity, and performance in acute to early sub-acute stroke relative to controls.

Method: Cross-sectional BELS data from 88 acute left and right hemisphere stroke patients (within 7 weeks of stroke) and 116 age-matched healthy controls were compared using independent samples t-tests. ROC Curve Analysis was performed to determine a cutoff score for the BELS.

Results: Left and right stroke patients were reduced on all propositional language subtests, and executive function subtests of inhibition, strategy, and selection. Differences were also observed for Oral Apraxia, Naming, and Memory. By contrast, Word Comprehension and Repetition, and Sentence Completion Initiation (after corrections applied) did not differ between groups. A total BELS score of 79.25/100 was highly sensitive (.89) and specific (.89) when classifying stroke patients and healthy controls.

Conclusion: The BELS is brief, sensitive, suitable for bedside administration, and can aid in detection and rehabilitation of subtle executive language impairments. This in turn will help improve relationships and quality of life post-stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信