机器学习在 mTBI 诊断中的应用:系统回顾

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Patrick F Yao, Pranjan A Gandhi, Eric P McMullen, Marlin Manka, Jason Liang
{"title":"机器学习在 mTBI 诊断中的应用:系统回顾","authors":"Patrick F Yao, Pranjan A Gandhi, Eric P McMullen, Marlin Manka, Jason Liang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to review the literature regarding the current state and clinical applicability of machine learning models in prognosticating the outcomes of patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the early clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Databases were searched for studies including machine learning and mild traumatic brain injury from inception to March 10, 2023. Included studies had a primary outcome of predicting post-mild traumatic brain injury prognosis or sequelae. The Prediction model study Risk of Bias for Predictive Models assessment tool was used for assessing the risk of bias and applicability of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1235 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria, including data from 127,929 patients. The most frequently used modeling techniques were support vector machine and artificial neural network and area under the curve ranged from 0.66 to 0.889. Despite promise, several limitations to studies exist such as low sample sizes, database restrictions, inconsistencies in patient presentation definitions, and lack of comparison to traditional clinical judgment or tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models show potential in early stage mild traumatic brain injury prognostication, but to achieve widespread adoption, future clinical studies prognosticating mild traumatic brain injury using machine learning need to reduce bias, provide clarity and consistency in defining patient populations targeted and validate against established benchmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applications of Machine Learning in Prognostication of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick F Yao, Pranjan A Gandhi, Eric P McMullen, Marlin Manka, Jason Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to review the literature regarding the current state and clinical applicability of machine learning models in prognosticating the outcomes of patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the early clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Databases were searched for studies including machine learning and mild traumatic brain injury from inception to March 10, 2023. Included studies had a primary outcome of predicting post-mild traumatic brain injury prognosis or sequelae. The Prediction model study Risk of Bias for Predictive Models assessment tool was used for assessing the risk of bias and applicability of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1235 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria, including data from 127,929 patients. The most frequently used modeling techniques were support vector machine and artificial neural network and area under the curve ranged from 0.66 to 0.889. Despite promise, several limitations to studies exist such as low sample sizes, database restrictions, inconsistencies in patient presentation definitions, and lack of comparison to traditional clinical judgment or tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models show potential in early stage mild traumatic brain injury prognostication, but to achieve widespread adoption, future clinical studies prognosticating mild traumatic brain injury using machine learning need to reduce bias, provide clarity and consistency in defining patient populations targeted and validate against established benchmarks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"146-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的回顾有关机器学习(ML)模型在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者早期临床表现预后方面的现状和临床适用性的文献:设计:在数据库中搜索了从开始到 2023 年 3 月 10 日期间有关 ML 和 mTBI 的研究。纳入研究的主要结果是预测 mTBI 后的预后或后遗症。预测模型研究偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)用于评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和适用性:在 1235 篇文章中,有 10 篇符合纳入标准,包括 127929 名患者的数据。最常用的建模技术是支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(NN),曲线下面积(AUC)在 0.66-0.889 之间。尽管前景看好,但研究仍存在一些局限性,如样本量少、数据库限制、患者表现定义不一致以及缺乏与传统临床判断或工具的比较等:ML模型在早期mTBI预后中显示出了潜力,但要实现广泛应用,未来使用ML对mTBI进行预后的临床研究需要减少偏倚,在定义目标患者人群时提供清晰度和一致性,并根据既定基准进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applications of Machine Learning in Prognostication of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Objective: The aim of the study is to review the literature regarding the current state and clinical applicability of machine learning models in prognosticating the outcomes of patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the early clinical presentation.

Design: Databases were searched for studies including machine learning and mild traumatic brain injury from inception to March 10, 2023. Included studies had a primary outcome of predicting post-mild traumatic brain injury prognosis or sequelae. The Prediction model study Risk of Bias for Predictive Models assessment tool was used for assessing the risk of bias and applicability of included studies.

Results: Out of 1235 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria, including data from 127,929 patients. The most frequently used modeling techniques were support vector machine and artificial neural network and area under the curve ranged from 0.66 to 0.889. Despite promise, several limitations to studies exist such as low sample sizes, database restrictions, inconsistencies in patient presentation definitions, and lack of comparison to traditional clinical judgment or tools.

Conclusions: Machine learning models show potential in early stage mild traumatic brain injury prognostication, but to achieve widespread adoption, future clinical studies prognosticating mild traumatic brain injury using machine learning need to reduce bias, provide clarity and consistency in defining patient populations targeted and validate against established benchmarks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信