膀胱尿路上皮癌预后预测的四基因模型

IF 1 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Binghao Ye , Zhiwen Xu , Zheyu Fan , Qiaoqiao Zheng , Ming Li , Zhiwei Huang , Jing Sun , Xingyuan Ma , Ping Shi
{"title":"膀胱尿路上皮癌预后预测的四基因模型","authors":"Binghao Ye ,&nbsp;Zhiwen Xu ,&nbsp;Zheyu Fan ,&nbsp;Qiaoqiao Zheng ,&nbsp;Ming Li ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Huang ,&nbsp;Jing Sun ,&nbsp;Xingyuan Ma ,&nbsp;Ping Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.genrep.2024.101936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is one of the most common malignant tumors in urinary system worldwide. High possibility of recurrence and progression leads to poor prognosis, revealing the significant role of long-term postoperative monitoring to the patients. However, effective noninvasive diagnosis is currently limited.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed using R-packages. Functional enrichment analyses were performed on Metascape. The prognostic model was established by multi-step cox regression and evaluated by survival plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The nomogram was then constructed based on three identified prognostic factors. C-index and calibration curves were calculated to testify the capacity for predicting survival possibility of BLCA patients. The transcription levels of model genes were further verified in a gemcitabine-resistant bladder cancer cell line T24 (TGR) by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>360 genes were differentially expressed between BLCA and normal bladder mucosae simultaneously in three GEO datasets, of which 59 were up-regulated and 301 were down-regulated. 159 prognostic genes were obtained from DEGs. Lasso and multivariate cox regression were conducted in sequence and the prognostic model was eventually optimized to four genes (<em>EHBP1</em>, <em>RHOJ</em>, <em>FASN</em>, <em>STXBP6</em>). Survival analyses demonstrated that the overall survival (OS) of patients in high-risk group was significantly shorter than that in low-risk group. The area under the curve (AUC) values of 3–5 years survival were basically above 0.7. Moreover, cox regression analyses showed that age, T stage and risk score were independent indicators for BLCA prognosis. For further clinical application, a nomogram was then constructed by integrating these factors. The C-index (0.72, CI 95 %, 0.669–0.775) and calibration curves demonstrated the good performance of nomogram. Importantly, the mRNA level of model genes was significantly up-regulated in TGR compared to T24, indicating a better prediction for chemotherapy-resistant BLCA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Collectively, our findings suggest a novel four-gene predictive model for BLCA prognosis. It is expected to provide a valuable reference for prognostic evaluation and treatment in BLCA patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12673,"journal":{"name":"Gene Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A four-gene model for prognostic prediction in bladder urothelial carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Binghao Ye ,&nbsp;Zhiwen Xu ,&nbsp;Zheyu Fan ,&nbsp;Qiaoqiao Zheng ,&nbsp;Ming Li ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Huang ,&nbsp;Jing Sun ,&nbsp;Xingyuan Ma ,&nbsp;Ping Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genrep.2024.101936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is one of the most common malignant tumors in urinary system worldwide. High possibility of recurrence and progression leads to poor prognosis, revealing the significant role of long-term postoperative monitoring to the patients. However, effective noninvasive diagnosis is currently limited.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed using R-packages. Functional enrichment analyses were performed on Metascape. The prognostic model was established by multi-step cox regression and evaluated by survival plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The nomogram was then constructed based on three identified prognostic factors. C-index and calibration curves were calculated to testify the capacity for predicting survival possibility of BLCA patients. The transcription levels of model genes were further verified in a gemcitabine-resistant bladder cancer cell line T24 (TGR) by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>360 genes were differentially expressed between BLCA and normal bladder mucosae simultaneously in three GEO datasets, of which 59 were up-regulated and 301 were down-regulated. 159 prognostic genes were obtained from DEGs. Lasso and multivariate cox regression were conducted in sequence and the prognostic model was eventually optimized to four genes (<em>EHBP1</em>, <em>RHOJ</em>, <em>FASN</em>, <em>STXBP6</em>). Survival analyses demonstrated that the overall survival (OS) of patients in high-risk group was significantly shorter than that in low-risk group. The area under the curve (AUC) values of 3–5 years survival were basically above 0.7. Moreover, cox regression analyses showed that age, T stage and risk score were independent indicators for BLCA prognosis. For further clinical application, a nomogram was then constructed by integrating these factors. The C-index (0.72, CI 95 %, 0.669–0.775) and calibration curves demonstrated the good performance of nomogram. Importantly, the mRNA level of model genes was significantly up-regulated in TGR compared to T24, indicating a better prediction for chemotherapy-resistant BLCA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Collectively, our findings suggest a novel four-gene predictive model for BLCA prognosis. It is expected to provide a valuable reference for prognostic evaluation and treatment in BLCA patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gene Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gene Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452014424000591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452014424000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景膀胱尿路上皮癌(BLCA)是全球泌尿系统最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。膀胱尿路上皮癌(BLCA)是全球泌尿系统最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,复发和进展的可能性很高,导致预后不佳,因此对患者进行术后长期监测具有重要作用。然而,目前有效的无创诊断还很有限。材料与方法使用 R 软件包分析差异表达基因(DEGs)。在 Metascape 上进行了功能富集分析。通过多步考克斯回归建立预后模型,并通过生存图和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)进行评估。然后根据三个确定的预后因素构建了提名图。计算了 C 指数和校准曲线,以证明其预测 BLCA 患者生存可能性的能力。结果 360 个基因在三个 GEO 数据集中同时在 BLCA 和正常膀胱粘膜之间有差异表达,其中 59 个基因上调,301 个基因下调。从DEGs中获得了159个预后基因。依次进行了Lasso和多变量cox回归,最终将预后模型优化为4个基因(EHBP1、RHOJ、FASN和STXBP6)。生存分析表明,高风险组患者的总生存期(OS)明显短于低风险组。3-5 年生存率的曲线下面积(AUC)值基本都在 0.7 以上。此外,Cox 回归分析表明,年龄、T 分期和风险评分是 BLCA 预后的独立指标。为了进一步应用于临床,研究人员综合这些因素构建了一个提名图。C指数(0.72,CI 95 %,0.669-0.775)和校准曲线显示了提名图的良好性能。重要的是,与 T24 相比,模型基因的 mRNA 水平在 TGR 中明显上调,这表明对化疗耐药的 BLCA 患者有更好的预测效果。结论:我们的研究结果综合提出了一种新的 BLCA 预后四基因预测模型,有望为 BLCA 患者的预后评估和治疗提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A four-gene model for prognostic prediction in bladder urothelial carcinoma

Background

Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is one of the most common malignant tumors in urinary system worldwide. High possibility of recurrence and progression leads to poor prognosis, revealing the significant role of long-term postoperative monitoring to the patients. However, effective noninvasive diagnosis is currently limited.

Materials and methods

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed using R-packages. Functional enrichment analyses were performed on Metascape. The prognostic model was established by multi-step cox regression and evaluated by survival plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The nomogram was then constructed based on three identified prognostic factors. C-index and calibration curves were calculated to testify the capacity for predicting survival possibility of BLCA patients. The transcription levels of model genes were further verified in a gemcitabine-resistant bladder cancer cell line T24 (TGR) by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

Results

360 genes were differentially expressed between BLCA and normal bladder mucosae simultaneously in three GEO datasets, of which 59 were up-regulated and 301 were down-regulated. 159 prognostic genes were obtained from DEGs. Lasso and multivariate cox regression were conducted in sequence and the prognostic model was eventually optimized to four genes (EHBP1, RHOJ, FASN, STXBP6). Survival analyses demonstrated that the overall survival (OS) of patients in high-risk group was significantly shorter than that in low-risk group. The area under the curve (AUC) values of 3–5 years survival were basically above 0.7. Moreover, cox regression analyses showed that age, T stage and risk score were independent indicators for BLCA prognosis. For further clinical application, a nomogram was then constructed by integrating these factors. The C-index (0.72, CI 95 %, 0.669–0.775) and calibration curves demonstrated the good performance of nomogram. Importantly, the mRNA level of model genes was significantly up-regulated in TGR compared to T24, indicating a better prediction for chemotherapy-resistant BLCA patients.

Conclusion

Collectively, our findings suggest a novel four-gene predictive model for BLCA prognosis. It is expected to provide a valuable reference for prognostic evaluation and treatment in BLCA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gene Reports
Gene Reports Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
246
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Gene Reports publishes papers that focus on the regulation, expression, function and evolution of genes in all biological contexts, including all prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, as well as viruses. Gene Reports strives to be a very diverse journal and topics in all fields will be considered for publication. Although not limited to the following, some general topics include: DNA Organization, Replication & Evolution -Focus on genomic DNA (chromosomal organization, comparative genomics, DNA replication, DNA repair, mobile DNA, mitochondrial DNA, chloroplast DNA). Expression & Function - Focus on functional RNAs (microRNAs, tRNAs, rRNAs, mRNA splicing, alternative polyadenylation) Regulation - Focus on processes that mediate gene-read out (epigenetics, chromatin, histone code, transcription, translation, protein degradation). Cell Signaling - Focus on mechanisms that control information flow into the nucleus to control gene expression (kinase and phosphatase pathways controlled by extra-cellular ligands, Wnt, Notch, TGFbeta/BMPs, FGFs, IGFs etc.) Profiling of gene expression and genetic variation - Focus on high throughput approaches (e.g., DeepSeq, ChIP-Seq, Affymetrix microarrays, proteomics) that define gene regulatory circuitry, molecular pathways and protein/protein networks. Genetics - Focus on development in model organisms (e.g., mouse, frog, fruit fly, worm), human genetic variation, population genetics, as well as agricultural and veterinary genetics. Molecular Pathology & Regenerative Medicine - Focus on the deregulation of molecular processes in human diseases and mechanisms supporting regeneration of tissues through pluripotent or multipotent stem cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信