中心体蛋白 290 (CEP290) 相关遗传性视网膜变性的 12 个月自然史研究

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eric A. Pierce MD, PhD , Bright S. Ashimatey OD, PhD , Thiran Jayasundera MD , Carel Hoyng MD , Byron L. Lam MD , Birgit Lorenz MD, PhD , Keunpyo Kim PhD , Alia Rashid MD , Rene Myers PhD , Mark E. Pennesi MD, PhD
{"title":"中心体蛋白 290 (CEP290) 相关遗传性视网膜变性的 12 个月自然史研究","authors":"Eric A. Pierce MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bright S. Ashimatey OD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thiran Jayasundera MD ,&nbsp;Carel Hoyng MD ,&nbsp;Byron L. Lam MD ,&nbsp;Birgit Lorenz MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keunpyo Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Alia Rashid MD ,&nbsp;Rene Myers PhD ,&nbsp;Mark E. Pennesi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To define the clinical characteristics of centrosomal protein 290 (<em>CEP290</em>)-associated inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and determine which assessments may provide reliable endpoints in future interventional trials.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Participants in this natural history study were enrolled into 2 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) cohorts: light perception to &gt; 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and 1.0 logMAR to 0.4 logMAR. Each comprised 4 age cohorts (3–5, 6–11, 12–17, and ≥ 18 years).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients with <em>CEP290</em>-associated IRD caused by the intron 26 c.2991+1655A&gt;G mutation and BCVA ranging from light perception to 0.4 logMAR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Best-corrected visual acuity, full-field stimulus threshold (FST) sensitivity, Ora–Visual Navigation Challenge (Ora–VNC) composite score, and OCT–outer nuclear layer (OCT–ONL) average thickness were assessed at screening, baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Best-corrected visual acuity, FST sensitivity, Ora–VNC composite score, and OCT–ONL average thickness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six participants were included in this analysis. Nineteen were female. All participants were White and 4 reported Hispanic ethnicity. At screening, 13 of 16 adult and 9 of 10 pediatric participants had BCVA &gt; 1.0 logMAR. Baseline BCVA was variable (median [range] = 2.0 [0.5, 3.9] logMAR) and was uncorrelated with age, as were VNC composite score, FST sensitivity, and OCT–ONL average thickness. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) test-retest variability was −0.04 (−0.09, 0.01) logMAR for BCVA (n = 25); 0.6 (−0.1, 1.3) for VNC composite score (n = 18); and 0.10 (−0.07, 0.27) log cd.s/m<sup>2</sup> for red FST (n = 14). A greater than expected test-retest variability (5 [0, 10] μm, n = 14) was observed for OCT–ONL average thickness as nystagmus impacted ability to repeat measures at the same retinal location. Functional assessments were stable over 12 months. Mean (95% CI) change from baseline was 0.06 (−0.17, 0.29) logMAR for BCVA (n = 23); −0.1 (−1.2, 1.0) for VNC composite score (n = 21); and −0.15 (−0.43, 0.14) log cd.s/m<sup>2</sup> for red FST (n = 16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Vision was stable over 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity, FST, and VNC composite score are potentially viable endpoints for future studies in CEP290-associated IRD. Repeatability of OCT measures poses challenges for quantifying anatomical changes in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000198/pdfft?md5=b79641bae2c993d7c363453a589fb4b2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524000198-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twelve-month Natural History Study of Centrosomal Protein 290 (CEP290)-associated Inherited Retinal Degeneration\",\"authors\":\"Eric A. Pierce MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bright S. Ashimatey OD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thiran Jayasundera MD ,&nbsp;Carel Hoyng MD ,&nbsp;Byron L. Lam MD ,&nbsp;Birgit Lorenz MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keunpyo Kim PhD ,&nbsp;Alia Rashid MD ,&nbsp;Rene Myers PhD ,&nbsp;Mark E. Pennesi MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To define the clinical characteristics of centrosomal protein 290 (<em>CEP290</em>)-associated inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and determine which assessments may provide reliable endpoints in future interventional trials.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Participants in this natural history study were enrolled into 2 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) cohorts: light perception to &gt; 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and 1.0 logMAR to 0.4 logMAR. Each comprised 4 age cohorts (3–5, 6–11, 12–17, and ≥ 18 years).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients with <em>CEP290</em>-associated IRD caused by the intron 26 c.2991+1655A&gt;G mutation and BCVA ranging from light perception to 0.4 logMAR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Best-corrected visual acuity, full-field stimulus threshold (FST) sensitivity, Ora–Visual Navigation Challenge (Ora–VNC) composite score, and OCT–outer nuclear layer (OCT–ONL) average thickness were assessed at screening, baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Best-corrected visual acuity, FST sensitivity, Ora–VNC composite score, and OCT–ONL average thickness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six participants were included in this analysis. Nineteen were female. All participants were White and 4 reported Hispanic ethnicity. At screening, 13 of 16 adult and 9 of 10 pediatric participants had BCVA &gt; 1.0 logMAR. Baseline BCVA was variable (median [range] = 2.0 [0.5, 3.9] logMAR) and was uncorrelated with age, as were VNC composite score, FST sensitivity, and OCT–ONL average thickness. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) test-retest variability was −0.04 (−0.09, 0.01) logMAR for BCVA (n = 25); 0.6 (−0.1, 1.3) for VNC composite score (n = 18); and 0.10 (−0.07, 0.27) log cd.s/m<sup>2</sup> for red FST (n = 14). A greater than expected test-retest variability (5 [0, 10] μm, n = 14) was observed for OCT–ONL average thickness as nystagmus impacted ability to repeat measures at the same retinal location. Functional assessments were stable over 12 months. Mean (95% CI) change from baseline was 0.06 (−0.17, 0.29) logMAR for BCVA (n = 23); −0.1 (−1.2, 1.0) for VNC composite score (n = 21); and −0.15 (−0.43, 0.14) log cd.s/m<sup>2</sup> for red FST (n = 16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Vision was stable over 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity, FST, and VNC composite score are potentially viable endpoints for future studies in CEP290-associated IRD. Repeatability of OCT measures poses challenges for quantifying anatomical changes in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000198/pdfft?md5=b79641bae2c993d7c363453a589fb4b2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524000198-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定中心体蛋白 290(CEP290)相关遗传性视网膜变性(IRD)的临床特征,并确定哪些评估可为未来的干预性试验提供可靠的终点。设计将这项自然史研究的参与者分为两个最佳矫正视力(BCVA)组别:光感至> 1.0最小分辨角的对数(logMAR)和1.0 logMAR至0.4 logMAR。每个组包括 4 个年龄组(3-5 岁、6-11 岁、12-17 岁和≥18 岁)。参与者由内含子 26 c.2991 +1655A>G 引起的 CEP290 相关 IRD 患者。+方法在筛查、基线、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时评估最佳矫正视力、全视野刺激阈值 (FST) 灵敏度、Ora-视觉导航挑战 (Ora-VNC) 综合评分和 OCT-核外层 (OCT-ONL) 平均厚度。主要结果指标最佳矫正视力、FST灵敏度、Ora-VNC综合评分和OCT-ONL平均厚度。其中 19 人为女性。所有参与者均为白人,4 人报告为西班牙裔。筛查时,16 名成人参与者中有 13 人的 BCVA 为 1.0 logMAR,10 名儿童参与者中有 9 人的 BCVA 为 1.0 logMAR。基线 BCVA 不固定(中位数 [范围] = 2.0 [0.5, 3.9] logMAR),与年龄无关,VNC 综合评分、FST 敏感度和 OCT-ONL 平均厚度也与年龄无关。BCVA(25 人)的平均(95% 置信区间 [CI])测试-重复变异性为-0.04 (-0.09, 0.01) logMAR;VNC 综合评分(18 人)为 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3);红色 FST(14 人)为 0.10 (-0.07, 0.27) log cd.s/m2。由于眼球震颤影响了在同一视网膜位置重复测量的能力,OCT-ONL 平均厚度的重复测试变异性(5 [0, 10] μm,n = 14)高于预期。功能评估结果在 12 个月内保持稳定。与基线相比,BCVA(23 人)的平均变化(95% CI)为 0.06 (-0.17, 0.29) logMAR;VNC 综合评分(21 人)为 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0);红色 FST(16 人)为 -0.15 (-0.43, 0.14) log cd.s/m2。最佳矫正视力、FST 和 VNC 综合评分是未来研究 CEP290 相关 IRD 的潜在可行终点。OCT测量的可重复性为量化该人群的解剖学变化带来了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Twelve-month Natural History Study of Centrosomal Protein 290 (CEP290)-associated Inherited Retinal Degeneration

Purpose

To define the clinical characteristics of centrosomal protein 290 (CEP290)-associated inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and determine which assessments may provide reliable endpoints in future interventional trials.

Design

Participants in this natural history study were enrolled into 2 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) cohorts: light perception to > 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and 1.0 logMAR to 0.4 logMAR. Each comprised 4 age cohorts (3–5, 6–11, 12–17, and ≥ 18 years).

Participants

Patients with CEP290-associated IRD caused by the intron 26 c.2991+1655A>G mutation and BCVA ranging from light perception to 0.4 logMAR.

Methods

Best-corrected visual acuity, full-field stimulus threshold (FST) sensitivity, Ora–Visual Navigation Challenge (Ora–VNC) composite score, and OCT–outer nuclear layer (OCT–ONL) average thickness were assessed at screening, baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Main Outcome Measures

Best-corrected visual acuity, FST sensitivity, Ora–VNC composite score, and OCT–ONL average thickness.

Results

Twenty-six participants were included in this analysis. Nineteen were female. All participants were White and 4 reported Hispanic ethnicity. At screening, 13 of 16 adult and 9 of 10 pediatric participants had BCVA > 1.0 logMAR. Baseline BCVA was variable (median [range] = 2.0 [0.5, 3.9] logMAR) and was uncorrelated with age, as were VNC composite score, FST sensitivity, and OCT–ONL average thickness. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) test-retest variability was −0.04 (−0.09, 0.01) logMAR for BCVA (n = 25); 0.6 (−0.1, 1.3) for VNC composite score (n = 18); and 0.10 (−0.07, 0.27) log cd.s/m2 for red FST (n = 14). A greater than expected test-retest variability (5 [0, 10] μm, n = 14) was observed for OCT–ONL average thickness as nystagmus impacted ability to repeat measures at the same retinal location. Functional assessments were stable over 12 months. Mean (95% CI) change from baseline was 0.06 (−0.17, 0.29) logMAR for BCVA (n = 23); −0.1 (−1.2, 1.0) for VNC composite score (n = 21); and −0.15 (−0.43, 0.14) log cd.s/m2 for red FST (n = 16).

Conclusions

Vision was stable over 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity, FST, and VNC composite score are potentially viable endpoints for future studies in CEP290-associated IRD. Repeatability of OCT measures poses challenges for quantifying anatomical changes in this population.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信