BOLD 信号变异性是功能性神经疾病的潜在新生物标记物

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Ayla Schneider , Samantha Weber , Anna Wyss , Serafeim Loukas , Selma Aybek
{"title":"BOLD 信号变异性是功能性神经疾病的潜在新生物标记物","authors":"Ayla Schneider ,&nbsp;Samantha Weber ,&nbsp;Anna Wyss ,&nbsp;Serafeim Loukas ,&nbsp;Selma Aybek","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common neuropsychiatric condition with established diagnostic criteria and effective treatments but for which the underlying neuropathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed FND as a multi-network brain disorder, unveiling alterations across limbic, self-agency, attentional/salience, and sensorimotor networks. However, the relationship between identified brain alterations and disease progression or improvement is less explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 79 patients with FND and 74 age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). First, voxel-wise BOLD signal variability was computed for each participant and the group-wise difference was calculated. Second, we investigated the potential of BOLD signal variability to serve as a prognostic biomarker for clinical outcome in 47 patients who attended a follow-up measurement after eight months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results demonstrated higher BOLD signal variability in key networks, including the somatomotor, salience, limbic, and dorsal attention networks, in patients compared to controls. Longitudinal analysis revealed an increase in BOLD signal variability in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in FND patients who had an improved clinical outcome, suggesting SMA variability as a potential state biomarker. Additionally, higher BOLD signal variability in the left insula at baseline predicted a worse clinical outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study contributes to the understanding of FND pathophysiology, emphasizing the dynamic nature of neural activity and highlighting the potential of BOLD signal variability as a valuable research tool. The insula and SMA emerge as promising regions for further investigation as prognostic and state markers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000640/pdfft?md5=63fe340d1767ef84c27b8f7065e8552b&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000640-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOLD signal variability as potential new biomarker of functional neurological disorders\",\"authors\":\"Ayla Schneider ,&nbsp;Samantha Weber ,&nbsp;Anna Wyss ,&nbsp;Serafeim Loukas ,&nbsp;Selma Aybek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common neuropsychiatric condition with established diagnostic criteria and effective treatments but for which the underlying neuropathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed FND as a multi-network brain disorder, unveiling alterations across limbic, self-agency, attentional/salience, and sensorimotor networks. However, the relationship between identified brain alterations and disease progression or improvement is less explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 79 patients with FND and 74 age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). First, voxel-wise BOLD signal variability was computed for each participant and the group-wise difference was calculated. Second, we investigated the potential of BOLD signal variability to serve as a prognostic biomarker for clinical outcome in 47 patients who attended a follow-up measurement after eight months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results demonstrated higher BOLD signal variability in key networks, including the somatomotor, salience, limbic, and dorsal attention networks, in patients compared to controls. Longitudinal analysis revealed an increase in BOLD signal variability in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in FND patients who had an improved clinical outcome, suggesting SMA variability as a potential state biomarker. Additionally, higher BOLD signal variability in the left insula at baseline predicted a worse clinical outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study contributes to the understanding of FND pathophysiology, emphasizing the dynamic nature of neural activity and highlighting the potential of BOLD signal variability as a valuable research tool. The insula and SMA emerge as promising regions for further investigation as prognostic and state markers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000640/pdfft?md5=63fe340d1767ef84c27b8f7065e8552b&pid=1-s2.0-S2213158224000640-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000640\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224000640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景功能性神经障碍(FND)是一种常见的神经精神疾病,有明确的诊断标准和有效的治疗方法,但其潜在的神经病理生理学机制仍不完全清楚。最近的神经影像学研究表明,FND 是一种多网络脑部疾病,揭示了边缘、自我代理、注意/注意力和感觉运动网络的改变。本研究纳入了 79 名 FND 患者和 74 名年龄与性别匹配的健康对照组(HC)的静息态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据。首先,我们计算了每位参与者的体素 BOLD 信号变异性,并计算了组间差异。其次,我们研究了 BOLD 信号变异性作为临床结果预后生物标志物的潜力,47 名患者在 8 个月后参加了随访测量。结果表明,与对照组相比,患者关键网络的 BOLD 信号变异性更高,包括躯体运动网络、显著性网络、边缘网络和背侧注意力网络。纵向分析表明,FND 患者的辅助运动区(SMA)的 BOLD 信号变异性增加,而这些患者的临床结果有所改善,这表明 SMA 变异性是一种潜在的状态生物标志物。此外,基线时左侧脑岛较高的 BOLD 信号变异性预示着较差的临床结果。结论这项研究有助于理解 FND 的病理生理学,强调了神经活动的动态性质,并突出了 BOLD 信号变异性作为一种有价值的研究工具的潜力。脑岛和SMA是有希望作为预后和状态标志物接受进一步研究的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BOLD signal variability as potential new biomarker of functional neurological disorders

Background

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common neuropsychiatric condition with established diagnostic criteria and effective treatments but for which the underlying neuropathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed FND as a multi-network brain disorder, unveiling alterations across limbic, self-agency, attentional/salience, and sensorimotor networks. However, the relationship between identified brain alterations and disease progression or improvement is less explored.

Methods

This study included resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 79 patients with FND and 74 age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). First, voxel-wise BOLD signal variability was computed for each participant and the group-wise difference was calculated. Second, we investigated the potential of BOLD signal variability to serve as a prognostic biomarker for clinical outcome in 47 patients who attended a follow-up measurement after eight months.

Results

The results demonstrated higher BOLD signal variability in key networks, including the somatomotor, salience, limbic, and dorsal attention networks, in patients compared to controls. Longitudinal analysis revealed an increase in BOLD signal variability in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in FND patients who had an improved clinical outcome, suggesting SMA variability as a potential state biomarker. Additionally, higher BOLD signal variability in the left insula at baseline predicted a worse clinical outcome.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the understanding of FND pathophysiology, emphasizing the dynamic nature of neural activity and highlighting the potential of BOLD signal variability as a valuable research tool. The insula and SMA emerge as promising regions for further investigation as prognostic and state markers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信