{"title":"库尔德家庭对癌症诊断披露的看法:横断面研究","authors":"D.M. Abdulah , S.T. Ahmad , M.H. Kadhim","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Eastern cultures, healthcare providers often engage the family in decision-making, frequently without the patient's explicit consent. Owing to a lack of information, we aimed to explore Kurdish families’ perceptions of cancer diagnosis disclosure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five hundred families of patients who attended the sole adult tertiary health facility in the Kurdistan Region were personally invited to this cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the family members was 46.24 (19–87 years). Most of the participants reported that they prefer a patient be told he/she has cancer (63.60%). Their reasons were to help course of treatment (16.67%), to improve the relationship with the family (9.43%), to avoid living an illusion (5.66%), to better organize their life (20.13%), and a combination of these reasons (48.11%). The remaining 36.4% of participants did not agree to disclose the truth to their patients. The reasons of these participants were knowing the truth changes everyday life (3.30%), it helps in the course of treatment of patients (1.65%), because there is no treatment for cancer (5.50%), knowing the truth has negative psychological effects (21.98%), knowing the truth has negative social effects (1.65%), the patients will not be cooperative with treatment (3.85%), information disclosure may not be necessary be desired or helpful for some patients at a specific time (1.10%), and a combination of these reasons (60.99%). They reported that religion and family have roles in accepting the disease (67.2 and 94.2%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Concussions</h3><p>A considerable percentage of Kurdistan family members had a negative attitude towards diagnosis disclosure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kurdish families’ perspectives towards diagnosis disclosure of cancer disease: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"D.M. Abdulah , S.T. Ahmad , M.H. Kadhim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Eastern cultures, healthcare providers often engage the family in decision-making, frequently without the patient's explicit consent. Owing to a lack of information, we aimed to explore Kurdish families’ perceptions of cancer diagnosis disclosure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five hundred families of patients who attended the sole adult tertiary health facility in the Kurdistan Region were personally invited to this cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the family members was 46.24 (19–87 years). Most of the participants reported that they prefer a patient be told he/she has cancer (63.60%). Their reasons were to help course of treatment (16.67%), to improve the relationship with the family (9.43%), to avoid living an illusion (5.66%), to better organize their life (20.13%), and a combination of these reasons (48.11%). The remaining 36.4% of participants did not agree to disclose the truth to their patients. The reasons of these participants were knowing the truth changes everyday life (3.30%), it helps in the course of treatment of patients (1.65%), because there is no treatment for cancer (5.50%), knowing the truth has negative psychological effects (21.98%), knowing the truth has negative social effects (1.65%), the patients will not be cooperative with treatment (3.85%), information disclosure may not be necessary be desired or helpful for some patients at a specific time (1.10%), and a combination of these reasons (60.99%). They reported that religion and family have roles in accepting the disease (67.2 and 94.2%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Concussions</h3><p>A considerable percentage of Kurdistan family members had a negative attitude towards diagnosis disclosure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kurdish families’ perspectives towards diagnosis disclosure of cancer disease: A cross-sectional study
Background
In Eastern cultures, healthcare providers often engage the family in decision-making, frequently without the patient's explicit consent. Owing to a lack of information, we aimed to explore Kurdish families’ perceptions of cancer diagnosis disclosure.
Methods
Five hundred families of patients who attended the sole adult tertiary health facility in the Kurdistan Region were personally invited to this cross-sectional study.
Results
The mean age of the family members was 46.24 (19–87 years). Most of the participants reported that they prefer a patient be told he/she has cancer (63.60%). Their reasons were to help course of treatment (16.67%), to improve the relationship with the family (9.43%), to avoid living an illusion (5.66%), to better organize their life (20.13%), and a combination of these reasons (48.11%). The remaining 36.4% of participants did not agree to disclose the truth to their patients. The reasons of these participants were knowing the truth changes everyday life (3.30%), it helps in the course of treatment of patients (1.65%), because there is no treatment for cancer (5.50%), knowing the truth has negative psychological effects (21.98%), knowing the truth has negative social effects (1.65%), the patients will not be cooperative with treatment (3.85%), information disclosure may not be necessary be desired or helpful for some patients at a specific time (1.10%), and a combination of these reasons (60.99%). They reported that religion and family have roles in accepting the disease (67.2 and 94.2%, respectively).
Concussions
A considerable percentage of Kurdistan family members had a negative attitude towards diagnosis disclosure.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.