模拟在获得与医疗保健相关的社会情感技能方面的有效性:系统综述的系统综述

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
María Lanza-Postigo RN , Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo PhD, RN , Roberto Martin-Melón , Noelia Ruiz-Pellón RN , Carmen Ortego-Maté PhD, RN
{"title":"模拟在获得与医疗保健相关的社会情感技能方面的有效性:系统综述的系统综述","authors":"María Lanza-Postigo RN ,&nbsp;Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Roberto Martin-Melón ,&nbsp;Noelia Ruiz-Pellón RN ,&nbsp;Carmen Ortego-Maté PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The objective of this SR of SR is to answer the question: Is simulation effective for the acquisition of socio-emotional skills related to health care?</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Simulation has become a relevant methodology for the training of socioemotional skills; however, the effectiveness of this methodology is difficult to interpret due to the diversity of results obtained to date.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. The searches were completed between December 2021 and January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022339156).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1285 studies were examined, of which seven systematic reviews were selected, yielding 88 studies with 8658 participants. The most commonly used methodologies were standardized patient (28.4%) and high-fidelity simulation (26.1%). The training consisted of an average of 3.6 sessions, with a mean duration of 153.8 minutes. The most trained socioemotional skills were communication (34.4%), self-efficacy (30.5%), and self-confidence (13.3%). Most studies (78.4%) reported statistically significant results favorable to the intervention group in all skills trained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Simulation is an effective methodology for training a wide range of social and emotional competencies in students and health science professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000392/pdfft?md5=fa3a4331b92be0a1a041fb03b242534a&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000392-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Simulation in the Acquisition of Socioemotional Skills Related to Health Care: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews\",\"authors\":\"María Lanza-Postigo RN ,&nbsp;Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Roberto Martin-Melón ,&nbsp;Noelia Ruiz-Pellón RN ,&nbsp;Carmen Ortego-Maté PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The objective of this SR of SR is to answer the question: Is simulation effective for the acquisition of socio-emotional skills related to health care?</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Simulation has become a relevant methodology for the training of socioemotional skills; however, the effectiveness of this methodology is difficult to interpret due to the diversity of results obtained to date.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. The searches were completed between December 2021 and January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022339156).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1285 studies were examined, of which seven systematic reviews were selected, yielding 88 studies with 8658 participants. The most commonly used methodologies were standardized patient (28.4%) and high-fidelity simulation (26.1%). The training consisted of an average of 3.6 sessions, with a mean duration of 153.8 minutes. The most trained socioemotional skills were communication (34.4%), self-efficacy (30.5%), and self-confidence (13.3%). Most studies (78.4%) reported statistically significant results favorable to the intervention group in all skills trained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Simulation is an effective methodology for training a wide range of social and emotional competencies in students and health science professionals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000392/pdfft?md5=fa3a4331b92be0a1a041fb03b242534a&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000392-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000392\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在回答以下问题:背景模拟已成为社会情感技能培训的一种相关方法;然而,由于迄今为止获得的结果多种多样,因此很难解释这种方法的有效性。方法在 Medline、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中检索 2011 年至 2022 年发表的系统综述和荟萃分析。检索工作于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月期间完成。研究质量采用 AMSTAR-2 量表进行评估。该研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42022339156)上注册。结果 共检索了 1285 项研究,其中 7 项系统综述被选中,共获得 88 项研究,8658 名参与者。最常用的方法是标准化病人(28.4%)和高仿真模拟(26.1%)。培训平均包括 3.6 节课,平均持续时间为 153.8 分钟。受训最多的社会情感技能是沟通(34.4%)、自我效能感(30.5%)和自信心(13.3%)。大多数研究(78.4%)报告称,在所有技能培训方面,干预组都取得了显著的统计结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Simulation in the Acquisition of Socioemotional Skills Related to Health Care: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

Aim

The objective of this SR of SR is to answer the question: Is simulation effective for the acquisition of socio-emotional skills related to health care?

Background

Simulation has become a relevant methodology for the training of socioemotional skills; however, the effectiveness of this methodology is difficult to interpret due to the diversity of results obtained to date.

Methods

Searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for systematic reviews with meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. The searches were completed between December 2021 and January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022339156).

Results

A total of 1285 studies were examined, of which seven systematic reviews were selected, yielding 88 studies with 8658 participants. The most commonly used methodologies were standardized patient (28.4%) and high-fidelity simulation (26.1%). The training consisted of an average of 3.6 sessions, with a mean duration of 153.8 minutes. The most trained socioemotional skills were communication (34.4%), self-efficacy (30.5%), and self-confidence (13.3%). Most studies (78.4%) reported statistically significant results favorable to the intervention group in all skills trained.

Conclusion

Simulation is an effective methodology for training a wide range of social and emotional competencies in students and health science professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信