人际沟通和感知规范作为成人使用电子烟的社会影响机制:系统性综述。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Joshua Awua, Antover P Tuliao, Dorothy Gabben-Mensah, Francis Kanjor, Nephtaly Joel B Botor, Lilian Ohene, Matthew K Meisel
{"title":"人际沟通和感知规范作为成人使用电子烟的社会影响机制:系统性综述。","authors":"Joshua Awua, Antover P Tuliao, Dorothy Gabben-Mensah, Francis Kanjor, Nephtaly Joel B Botor, Lilian Ohene, Matthew K Meisel","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2024.2346928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Given the increasing popularity of e-cigarette use among adults and the ongoing debate about the benefits and the potential adverse health risks associated with e-cigarette use, it is critical to identify the correlates of e-cigarette use. Prior research has found associations between interpersonal communication, perceived norms, and adults' e-cigarette use, but the evidence has yet to be summarized and synthesized.<i>Objectives:</i> This paper reviewed empirical studies examining the relationship between interpersonal communication, perceived norms, and e-cigarette use among adults.<i>Methods:</i> Following PRISMA guidelines, articles were searched on DOAJ, EMBASE, Europe PubMed Central, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and the reference list of the retrieved studies for studies that examined social influence on e-cigarette use. Three reviewers independently screened 1,713 non-duplicate papers and further screened the full text of 195 articles for inclusion.<i>Results:</i> Thirty studies (30), consisting of quantitative (<i>n</i> = 25) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 5) data, were included in this review. The twenty-five (25) quantitative studies consisted of both cross-sectional (<i>n</i> = 20) and longitudinal (<i>n</i> = 5) studies. Interpersonal communication portraying e-cigarettes as beneficial or harmful was found to increase e-cigarette use and quit attempts, respectively. Across study designs, greater perceptions of others' e-cigarette use or approval were related to more frequent e-cigarette use.<i>Conclusions:</i> The findings highlight that e-cigarette-related interpersonal communication and perceived norms are associated with e-cigarette use. These factors may be useful targets in brief interventions. However, most of the included studies were cross-sectional, limiting the ability to establish clear cause-and-effect relationships; therefore, more longitudinal studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"291-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpersonal communication and perceived norms as social influence mechanisms of e-cigarette use among adults: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Awua, Antover P Tuliao, Dorothy Gabben-Mensah, Francis Kanjor, Nephtaly Joel B Botor, Lilian Ohene, Matthew K Meisel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00952990.2024.2346928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Given the increasing popularity of e-cigarette use among adults and the ongoing debate about the benefits and the potential adverse health risks associated with e-cigarette use, it is critical to identify the correlates of e-cigarette use. Prior research has found associations between interpersonal communication, perceived norms, and adults' e-cigarette use, but the evidence has yet to be summarized and synthesized.<i>Objectives:</i> This paper reviewed empirical studies examining the relationship between interpersonal communication, perceived norms, and e-cigarette use among adults.<i>Methods:</i> Following PRISMA guidelines, articles were searched on DOAJ, EMBASE, Europe PubMed Central, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and the reference list of the retrieved studies for studies that examined social influence on e-cigarette use. Three reviewers independently screened 1,713 non-duplicate papers and further screened the full text of 195 articles for inclusion.<i>Results:</i> Thirty studies (30), consisting of quantitative (<i>n</i> = 25) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 5) data, were included in this review. The twenty-five (25) quantitative studies consisted of both cross-sectional (<i>n</i> = 20) and longitudinal (<i>n</i> = 5) studies. Interpersonal communication portraying e-cigarettes as beneficial or harmful was found to increase e-cigarette use and quit attempts, respectively. Across study designs, greater perceptions of others' e-cigarette use or approval were related to more frequent e-cigarette use.<i>Conclusions:</i> The findings highlight that e-cigarette-related interpersonal communication and perceived norms are associated with e-cigarette use. These factors may be useful targets in brief interventions. However, most of the included studies were cross-sectional, limiting the ability to establish clear cause-and-effect relationships; therefore, more longitudinal studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"291-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2024.2346928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2024.2346928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于电子烟在成年人中的使用日益普及,以及关于使用电子烟的益处和潜在不良健康风险的持续辩论,确定电子烟使用的相关因素至关重要。先前的研究发现了人际沟通、感知规范与成年人使用电子烟之间的关联,但这些证据还有待于总结和归纳:本文回顾了有关成人人际沟通、感知规范和电子烟使用之间关系的实证研究:按照 PRISMA 准则,在 DOAJ、EMBASE、欧洲 PubMed Central、谷歌学术、PsychINFO、PubMed、Web of Science 和检索到的研究参考文献列表中检索了有关社会影响对电子烟使用的研究文章。三位审稿人独立筛选了 1,713 篇非重复论文,并进一步筛选了 195 篇文章的全文以纳入研究:本综述共纳入 30 项研究(30 篇),包括定量研究(25 篇)和定性研究(5 篇)。25项定量研究包括横断面研究(20项)和纵向研究(5项)。研究发现,将电子烟描述为有益或有害的人际交流分别会增加电子烟的使用和戒烟尝试。在不同的研究设计中,对他人使用或认可电子烟的更多看法与更频繁地使用电子烟有关:研究结果强调,与电子烟相关的人际沟通和感知规范与电子烟的使用有关。这些因素可能是简短干预的有用目标。然而,纳入的大多数研究都是横断面研究,限制了建立明确因果关系的能力;因此,需要进行更多的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpersonal communication and perceived norms as social influence mechanisms of e-cigarette use among adults: a systematic review.

Background: Given the increasing popularity of e-cigarette use among adults and the ongoing debate about the benefits and the potential adverse health risks associated with e-cigarette use, it is critical to identify the correlates of e-cigarette use. Prior research has found associations between interpersonal communication, perceived norms, and adults' e-cigarette use, but the evidence has yet to be summarized and synthesized.Objectives: This paper reviewed empirical studies examining the relationship between interpersonal communication, perceived norms, and e-cigarette use among adults.Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, articles were searched on DOAJ, EMBASE, Europe PubMed Central, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and the reference list of the retrieved studies for studies that examined social influence on e-cigarette use. Three reviewers independently screened 1,713 non-duplicate papers and further screened the full text of 195 articles for inclusion.Results: Thirty studies (30), consisting of quantitative (n = 25) and qualitative (n = 5) data, were included in this review. The twenty-five (25) quantitative studies consisted of both cross-sectional (n = 20) and longitudinal (n = 5) studies. Interpersonal communication portraying e-cigarettes as beneficial or harmful was found to increase e-cigarette use and quit attempts, respectively. Across study designs, greater perceptions of others' e-cigarette use or approval were related to more frequent e-cigarette use.Conclusions: The findings highlight that e-cigarette-related interpersonal communication and perceived norms are associated with e-cigarette use. These factors may be useful targets in brief interventions. However, most of the included studies were cross-sectional, limiting the ability to establish clear cause-and-effect relationships; therefore, more longitudinal studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信