Hailey N Chambers, Elizabeth Caris, Jeffrey Conwell, Lindsay A Edwards, J Eddie Hulse, Mark Lewin, Nelangi M Pinto, Elana Wolfe, Bhawna Arya
{"title":"产科超声成像不佳应及早转诊进行胎儿超声心动图检查。","authors":"Hailey N Chambers, Elizabeth Caris, Jeffrey Conwell, Lindsay A Edwards, J Eddie Hulse, Mark Lewin, Nelangi M Pinto, Elana Wolfe, Bhawna Arya","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03495-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies suggest that suboptimal cardiac imaging on routine obstetric anatomy ultrasound (OB-scan) is not associated with a higher risk for congenital heart disease (CHD) and, therefore, should not be an indication for fetal echocardiography (F-echo). We aim to determine the incidence of CHD in patients referred for suboptimal imaging in a large catchment area, including regions that are geographically distant from a tertiary care center. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients referred to Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH) and SCH Regional Cardiology sites (SCH-RC) from 2011 to 2021 for F-echo with the indication of suboptimal cardiac imaging by OB-scan. Of 454 patients referred for suboptimal imaging, 21 (5%) of patients were diagnosed with CHD confirmed on postnatal echo. 10 patients (2%) required intervention by age one. Mean GA at F-echo was significantly later for suboptimal imaging compared to all other referral indications (27.5 ± 3.9 vs 25.2 ± 5.2 weeks, p < 0.01). Mean GA at F-echo was also significantly later at SCH-RC compared to SCH (29.2 ± 4.6 vs 24.2 ± 2.9 weeks; p < 0.01). In our experience, CHD in patients referred for suboptimal imaging is higher (5%) than previously described, suggesting that routine referral for is warranted. Furthermore, while suboptimal imaging was associated with a delayed F-echo compared to other indications, this delay was most striking for those seen at regional sites. This demonstrates a potential disparity for these patients and highlights opportunities for targeted education in cardiac assessment for primary providers in these regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"778-784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suboptimal Imaging on Obstetric Ultrasound Should Prompt Early Referral for Fetal Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Hailey N Chambers, Elizabeth Caris, Jeffrey Conwell, Lindsay A Edwards, J Eddie Hulse, Mark Lewin, Nelangi M Pinto, Elana Wolfe, Bhawna Arya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00246-024-03495-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent studies suggest that suboptimal cardiac imaging on routine obstetric anatomy ultrasound (OB-scan) is not associated with a higher risk for congenital heart disease (CHD) and, therefore, should not be an indication for fetal echocardiography (F-echo). We aim to determine the incidence of CHD in patients referred for suboptimal imaging in a large catchment area, including regions that are geographically distant from a tertiary care center. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients referred to Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH) and SCH Regional Cardiology sites (SCH-RC) from 2011 to 2021 for F-echo with the indication of suboptimal cardiac imaging by OB-scan. Of 454 patients referred for suboptimal imaging, 21 (5%) of patients were diagnosed with CHD confirmed on postnatal echo. 10 patients (2%) required intervention by age one. Mean GA at F-echo was significantly later for suboptimal imaging compared to all other referral indications (27.5 ± 3.9 vs 25.2 ± 5.2 weeks, p < 0.01). Mean GA at F-echo was also significantly later at SCH-RC compared to SCH (29.2 ± 4.6 vs 24.2 ± 2.9 weeks; p < 0.01). In our experience, CHD in patients referred for suboptimal imaging is higher (5%) than previously described, suggesting that routine referral for is warranted. Furthermore, while suboptimal imaging was associated with a delayed F-echo compared to other indications, this delay was most striking for those seen at regional sites. This demonstrates a potential disparity for these patients and highlights opportunities for targeted education in cardiac assessment for primary providers in these regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"778-784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03495-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03495-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的研究表明,常规产科解剖超声(OB-scan)的心脏成像不达标与先天性心脏病(CHD)的高风险无关,因此不应作为胎儿超声心动图(F-echo)的适应症。我们的目的是确定在一个大的覆盖区(包括与三级医疗中心地理位置相距较远的地区)中因次优成像而转诊的患者中先天性心脏病的发病率。我们对 2011 年至 2021 年期间转诊至西雅图儿童医院(SCH)和 SCH 区域心脏病学中心(SCH-RC)接受 F 回波检查的患者进行了回顾性病历审查,其指征为 OB 扫描心脏成像不达标。在转诊的 454 名成像不理想的患者中,有 21 名患者(5%)经产后回波检查确诊为先天性心脏病。10名患者(2%)需要在一岁前进行干预。与所有其他转诊指征相比,次优成像的 F 回波平均 GA 值明显较晚(27.5 ± 3.9 vs 25.2 ± 5.2 周,P
Suboptimal Imaging on Obstetric Ultrasound Should Prompt Early Referral for Fetal Echocardiography.
Recent studies suggest that suboptimal cardiac imaging on routine obstetric anatomy ultrasound (OB-scan) is not associated with a higher risk for congenital heart disease (CHD) and, therefore, should not be an indication for fetal echocardiography (F-echo). We aim to determine the incidence of CHD in patients referred for suboptimal imaging in a large catchment area, including regions that are geographically distant from a tertiary care center. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients referred to Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH) and SCH Regional Cardiology sites (SCH-RC) from 2011 to 2021 for F-echo with the indication of suboptimal cardiac imaging by OB-scan. Of 454 patients referred for suboptimal imaging, 21 (5%) of patients were diagnosed with CHD confirmed on postnatal echo. 10 patients (2%) required intervention by age one. Mean GA at F-echo was significantly later for suboptimal imaging compared to all other referral indications (27.5 ± 3.9 vs 25.2 ± 5.2 weeks, p < 0.01). Mean GA at F-echo was also significantly later at SCH-RC compared to SCH (29.2 ± 4.6 vs 24.2 ± 2.9 weeks; p < 0.01). In our experience, CHD in patients referred for suboptimal imaging is higher (5%) than previously described, suggesting that routine referral for is warranted. Furthermore, while suboptimal imaging was associated with a delayed F-echo compared to other indications, this delay was most striking for those seen at regional sites. This demonstrates a potential disparity for these patients and highlights opportunities for targeted education in cardiac assessment for primary providers in these regions.
期刊介绍:
The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.