Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich
{"title":"医用大麻及其对骨关节炎疼痛和功能的疗效。","authors":"Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review propsero registration: </strong>CRD42022354026.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical cannabis and its efficacy/effectiveness on the management of osteoarthritis pain and function.\",\"authors\":\"Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review propsero registration: </strong>CRD42022354026.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管对骨关节炎(OA)有药物治疗,但越来越多的人选择医用大麻来控制 OA 症状和减少 OA 的阿片类药物处方。本系统综述研究了使用医用大麻治疗 OA 疼痛和功能的全球证据:在 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase 和 CINAHL 中完成了过去 10 年(2012-2022 年)的检索。我们仅限于搜索英文文章。我们不包括灰色文献或病例研究。参与者的人口统计学特征包括所有使用医用大麻治疗 OA 的成年 OA 患者。我们使用 "建议、评估、开发和评价分级 "框架和 "干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险 "工具对研究质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。我们采用了叙事综合法:结果:共纳入 7 项研究:结果:共纳入了 7 项研究:2 项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 5 项观察性研究。2 项随机对照试验中只有 1 项报告了大麻使用者的疼痛有所改善。所有 5 项观察性研究都报告了疼痛程度的改善、阿片类药物使用的减少和/或 OA 整体功能的改善。尽管存在较高的偏倚风险和较低的研究质量,但各项研究一致认为,使用医用大麻对患有 OA 疼痛的亚群体有效:支持使用医用大麻替代 OA 初级药物治疗的证据质量不高。然而,这并不能否定医用大麻可为部分患者提供治疗缓解的观察结果:CRD42022354026。
Medical cannabis and its efficacy/effectiveness on the management of osteoarthritis pain and function.
Objective: Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.
Methods: The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.
Results: Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.
Conclusions: There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.