Heather L Ciallella, Danai T Taruvinga, Kimberly Yacoub, Szabolcs Sofalvi, Samantha M Delor, Claire K Kaspar, Christie L Mitchell-Mata, Shelby Travaglianti, Eric S Lavins, Luigino G Apollonio
{"title":"为公共毒理学实验室提供计算支持的苯并二氮杂卓设计策略。","authors":"Heather L Ciallella, Danai T Taruvinga, Kimberly Yacoub, Szabolcs Sofalvi, Samantha M Delor, Claire K Kaspar, Christie L Mitchell-Mata, Shelby Travaglianti, Eric S Lavins, Luigino G Apollonio","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public laboratories must balance innovative and existing methods to keep up with designer drug trends. This article presents a strategy for handling designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) in casework from screening to interpretation. The cross-reactivity of 22 DBZDs and metabolites was tested against the Immunalysis™ benzodiazepine (BZD) direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The kit had high intra-analyte precision (coefficients of variation <15%). Inter-analyte performance varied, triggering confirmation testing at concentrations ranging from 35 to 460 μg/L. The Cuyahoga County Regional Forensic Science Laboratory implemented a 40-analyte BZD and Z-drug confirmation method in 2019. Ten additional analytes were later validated for qualitative reporting, and the limits of detection for 13 analytes were lowered by 60%. The method of standard addition was also optimized for as-needed quantitation. Equal and 1/x weighting factors correlated well with target concentrations (coefficients of determination (r2) > 0.98), but 1/x weighting provided the most consistently accurate concentrations. Six computational models were developed to predict γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptor binding affinity to assist in case interpretation (r2 > 0.70 for cross-validation and test set prediction). These models were used to predict the binding affinity of analytes in the confirmation method. Other public laboratories can use this same practical strategy to adapt to any designer drug class (e.g., BZDs, opioids, cannabinoids and stimulants).</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"541-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A computationally supported designer benzodiazepine strategy for public toxicology laboratories.\",\"authors\":\"Heather L Ciallella, Danai T Taruvinga, Kimberly Yacoub, Szabolcs Sofalvi, Samantha M Delor, Claire K Kaspar, Christie L Mitchell-Mata, Shelby Travaglianti, Eric S Lavins, Luigino G Apollonio\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Public laboratories must balance innovative and existing methods to keep up with designer drug trends. This article presents a strategy for handling designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) in casework from screening to interpretation. The cross-reactivity of 22 DBZDs and metabolites was tested against the Immunalysis™ benzodiazepine (BZD) direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The kit had high intra-analyte precision (coefficients of variation <15%). Inter-analyte performance varied, triggering confirmation testing at concentrations ranging from 35 to 460 μg/L. The Cuyahoga County Regional Forensic Science Laboratory implemented a 40-analyte BZD and Z-drug confirmation method in 2019. Ten additional analytes were later validated for qualitative reporting, and the limits of detection for 13 analytes were lowered by 60%. The method of standard addition was also optimized for as-needed quantitation. Equal and 1/x weighting factors correlated well with target concentrations (coefficients of determination (r2) > 0.98), but 1/x weighting provided the most consistently accurate concentrations. Six computational models were developed to predict γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptor binding affinity to assist in case interpretation (r2 > 0.70 for cross-validation and test set prediction). These models were used to predict the binding affinity of analytes in the confirmation method. Other public laboratories can use this same practical strategy to adapt to any designer drug class (e.g., BZDs, opioids, cannabinoids and stimulants).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"541-549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A computationally supported designer benzodiazepine strategy for public toxicology laboratories.
Public laboratories must balance innovative and existing methods to keep up with designer drug trends. This article presents a strategy for handling designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) in casework from screening to interpretation. The cross-reactivity of 22 DBZDs and metabolites was tested against the Immunalysis™ benzodiazepine (BZD) direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The kit had high intra-analyte precision (coefficients of variation <15%). Inter-analyte performance varied, triggering confirmation testing at concentrations ranging from 35 to 460 μg/L. The Cuyahoga County Regional Forensic Science Laboratory implemented a 40-analyte BZD and Z-drug confirmation method in 2019. Ten additional analytes were later validated for qualitative reporting, and the limits of detection for 13 analytes were lowered by 60%. The method of standard addition was also optimized for as-needed quantitation. Equal and 1/x weighting factors correlated well with target concentrations (coefficients of determination (r2) > 0.98), but 1/x weighting provided the most consistently accurate concentrations. Six computational models were developed to predict γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptor binding affinity to assist in case interpretation (r2 > 0.70 for cross-validation and test set prediction). These models were used to predict the binding affinity of analytes in the confirmation method. Other public laboratories can use this same practical strategy to adapt to any designer drug class (e.g., BZDs, opioids, cannabinoids and stimulants).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation.
Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.