经鼻内窥镜手术后颅底重建的进展

Shuai Tang, Gang Yang
{"title":"经鼻内窥镜手术后颅底重建的进展","authors":"Shuai Tang, Gang Yang","doi":"10.56397/crms.2024.06.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endoscopic transnasal approach have experienced rapid development and gradual maturation in just a few decades (Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, et al, 2011; Eloy J A, Vivero R J, Hoang K, et al, 2009). It has expanded from the removal of conventional pituitary tumours to the application of an endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for the resection of tumours in the intrasellar, suprasellar and even ventricular systems (Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, Esposito F, et al, 2008). Larger bone and dural defects at the skull base, causing more severe postoperative complications and resulting in a multiplication of the healthcare burden (Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2013). Skull base Reconstruction after tumour removal has become a great challenge. Currently, skull base reconstruction is mainly divided into soft and rigid reconstruction, and soft reconstruction is represented by the technique of pedicled nasal septum mucosal flap (PNSF) (Thorp B D, Sreenath S B, Ebert C S, et al, 2014)0. As for rigid reconstruction, it is still controversial (Shin J, Forbes J, Lehner K, et al, 2019; Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2012). From the current studies, rigid reconstruction has a role that cannot be ignored. In this article, we will describe the development of skull base surgery and several high-profile skull base reconstruction techniques.","PeriodicalId":72751,"journal":{"name":"Current research in medical sciences","volume":"42 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in Skull Base Reconstruction After Transnasal Endoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Tang, Gang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.56397/crms.2024.06.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endoscopic transnasal approach have experienced rapid development and gradual maturation in just a few decades (Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, et al, 2011; Eloy J A, Vivero R J, Hoang K, et al, 2009). It has expanded from the removal of conventional pituitary tumours to the application of an endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for the resection of tumours in the intrasellar, suprasellar and even ventricular systems (Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, Esposito F, et al, 2008). Larger bone and dural defects at the skull base, causing more severe postoperative complications and resulting in a multiplication of the healthcare burden (Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2013). Skull base Reconstruction after tumour removal has become a great challenge. Currently, skull base reconstruction is mainly divided into soft and rigid reconstruction, and soft reconstruction is represented by the technique of pedicled nasal septum mucosal flap (PNSF) (Thorp B D, Sreenath S B, Ebert C S, et al, 2014)0. As for rigid reconstruction, it is still controversial (Shin J, Forbes J, Lehner K, et al, 2019; Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2012). From the current studies, rigid reconstruction has a role that cannot be ignored. In this article, we will describe the development of skull base surgery and several high-profile skull base reconstruction techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"42 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56397/crms.2024.06.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/crms.2024.06.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内窥镜经鼻方法在短短几十年间经历了快速发展和逐渐成熟(Kassam AB、Prevedello DM、Carrau RL 等人,2011 年;Eloy J A、Vivero R J、Hoang K 等人,2009 年)。这种方法已从切除传统垂体瘤扩展到应用内窥镜扩展经蝶窦方法切除鞘内、鞘上甚至脑室系统的肿瘤(Cappabianca P、Cavallo L M、Esposito F等人,2008年)。颅底骨质和硬脑膜缺损较大,会引起更严重的术后并发症,导致医疗负担倍增(Eloy J A、Shukla P A、Choudhry O J 等人,2013 年)。肿瘤切除后的颅底重建已成为一项巨大挑战。目前,颅底重建主要分为软性重建和硬性重建,软性重建以带蒂鼻中隔粘膜瓣(PNSF)技术为代表(Thorp B D, Sreenath S B, Ebert C S, et al, 2014)0。 至于硬性重建,目前仍存在争议(Shin J, Forbes J, Lehner K, et al, 2019; Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2012)。从目前的研究来看,刚性重建具有不可忽视的作用。本文将介绍颅底外科的发展以及几种备受瞩目的颅底重建技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances in Skull Base Reconstruction After Transnasal Endoscopy
Endoscopic transnasal approach have experienced rapid development and gradual maturation in just a few decades (Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, et al, 2011; Eloy J A, Vivero R J, Hoang K, et al, 2009). It has expanded from the removal of conventional pituitary tumours to the application of an endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for the resection of tumours in the intrasellar, suprasellar and even ventricular systems (Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, Esposito F, et al, 2008). Larger bone and dural defects at the skull base, causing more severe postoperative complications and resulting in a multiplication of the healthcare burden (Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2013). Skull base Reconstruction after tumour removal has become a great challenge. Currently, skull base reconstruction is mainly divided into soft and rigid reconstruction, and soft reconstruction is represented by the technique of pedicled nasal septum mucosal flap (PNSF) (Thorp B D, Sreenath S B, Ebert C S, et al, 2014)0. As for rigid reconstruction, it is still controversial (Shin J, Forbes J, Lehner K, et al, 2019; Eloy J A, Shukla P A, Choudhry O J, et al, 2012). From the current studies, rigid reconstruction has a role that cannot be ignored. In this article, we will describe the development of skull base surgery and several high-profile skull base reconstruction techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信