在没有确切法律依据的情况下终止在公司的工作

Fransiskus Xaverius Dias
{"title":"在没有确切法律依据的情况下终止在公司的工作","authors":"Fransiskus Xaverius Dias","doi":"10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Termination of Employment (PHK) is the termination of employment because something that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers / employers and employers is regulated in Article 1 number 25 of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower. In termination of employment sometimes disputes arise. These disputes tend to occur because there is no common understanding between workers / laborers and employers regarding the termination of employment relations. Settlement of PHK disputes can be carried out by Bipartite, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration and the Industrial Relations Court. This study aims to find out how arrangements regarding layoffs associated with severe errors made by employees. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Data sources used in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that layoffs due to gross misconduct must not be carried out unilaterally by employers but must wait for the criminal justice process until a court decision has permanent legal force and states that the employee has been legally and convincingly proven to have made a serious mistake. The legal remedies that can be done by employees who are laid off are fighting through bipartite if bipartite fails then it can go through the court. The suggestion in this study is that a company should be in termination of employment (PHK) must comply with labor laws in force in Indonesia so that there are no parties who feel disadvantaged.","PeriodicalId":477021,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DI SUATU PERUSAHAAN YANG TIDAK BERDASARKAN DASAR HUKUM YANG TEGAS\",\"authors\":\"Fransiskus Xaverius Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Termination of Employment (PHK) is the termination of employment because something that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers / employers and employers is regulated in Article 1 number 25 of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower. In termination of employment sometimes disputes arise. These disputes tend to occur because there is no common understanding between workers / laborers and employers regarding the termination of employment relations. Settlement of PHK disputes can be carried out by Bipartite, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration and the Industrial Relations Court. This study aims to find out how arrangements regarding layoffs associated with severe errors made by employees. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Data sources used in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that layoffs due to gross misconduct must not be carried out unilaterally by employers but must wait for the criminal justice process until a court decision has permanent legal force and states that the employee has been legally and convincingly proven to have made a serious mistake. The legal remedies that can be done by employees who are laid off are fighting through bipartite if bipartite fails then it can go through the court. The suggestion in this study is that a company should be in termination of employment (PHK) must comply with labor laws in force in Indonesia so that there are no parties who feel disadvantaged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":477021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2003 年第 13 号《人力法》第 1 条第 25 款规定,终止雇用 (PHK) 是指终止雇用,因为终止雇用会导致工人/雇主和雇主之间权利和义务的终止。在终止雇用时,有时会出现纠纷。这些争议的发生往往是因为工人/劳动者和雇主之间对终止雇用关系没有达成共识。解决 PHK 争议的方式有两方协商、调停、调解、仲裁和劳资关系法院。本研究旨在了解与雇员所犯严重错误相关的裁员安排。本研究采用的研究方法是规范法学。数据来源采用第一手法律资料、第二手法律资料和第三手法律资料的形式。研究结果表明,因严重不当行为导致的裁员不得由雇主单方面实施,而必须等待刑事司法程序,直到法院判决具有永久的法律效力,并在法律上令人信服地证明员工犯了严重错误。被解雇的员工可以采取的法律补救措施是通过双方谈判,如果双方谈判失败,则可以通过法院。本研究的建议是,公司在终止雇佣关系(PHK)时必须遵守印尼现行的劳动法,以避免任何一方感到处于不利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DI SUATU PERUSAHAAN YANG TIDAK BERDASARKAN DASAR HUKUM YANG TEGAS
Termination of Employment (PHK) is the termination of employment because something that results in the termination of rights and obligations between workers / employers and employers is regulated in Article 1 number 25 of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower. In termination of employment sometimes disputes arise. These disputes tend to occur because there is no common understanding between workers / laborers and employers regarding the termination of employment relations. Settlement of PHK disputes can be carried out by Bipartite, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration and the Industrial Relations Court. This study aims to find out how arrangements regarding layoffs associated with severe errors made by employees. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Data sources used in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that layoffs due to gross misconduct must not be carried out unilaterally by employers but must wait for the criminal justice process until a court decision has permanent legal force and states that the employee has been legally and convincingly proven to have made a serious mistake. The legal remedies that can be done by employees who are laid off are fighting through bipartite if bipartite fails then it can go through the court. The suggestion in this study is that a company should be in termination of employment (PHK) must comply with labor laws in force in Indonesia so that there are no parties who feel disadvantaged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信