从消费者法角度看与 SICPAT EKSPRES 条款和条件中的免责条款有关的 SICPAT EKSPRES 快递服务

Yovie Carissa Kumala, Evelyne Juanda T
{"title":"从消费者法角度看与 SICPAT EKSPRES 条款和条件中的免责条款有关的 SICPAT EKSPRES 快递服务","authors":"Yovie Carissa Kumala, Evelyne Juanda T","doi":"10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SICEPAT is one of delivery service in Indonesia that located in Jakarta. As the business owner in running its business for its consumer, SICEPAT already prepared every risks that may be occurred one day. Therefore SICEPAT prepared terms and conditions that can be seen by consumers. Inside the terms and conditions point 7, writers saw that SICEPAT included prohibited stipulation by Article 18 paragraph (1) letter a Consumer Protection Law that is written that SICEPAT Ekspres is not responsible if there is a damage, delay and loss to consumer (exoneration clause), this matter according to Article 18 paragraph (3) is stated void by law. The existence of exoneration clause in an agreement will be harmful to consumer. If the consumer experienced loss it means consumer’s rights as written in Article 4 Consumer Protection Law is violated. Therefore consumer has the right to get the compensation. And business owner as written in Article 7 Consumer Protection Law has the obligation that cannot be ignored. Even in Article 19 paragraph (1) Consumer Protection Law clearly stated that business owner must be responsible to give the compensation for the damages, and due to consuming object and/or service that produced or sold by the business owner, the consumer is able to file a report to SICEPAT Ekspres or do the remedy through court or outside the court (BPSK).","PeriodicalId":477021,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP JASA PENGIRIMAN SICEPAT EKSPRES TERKAIT KLAUSULA EKSONERASI DALAM SYARAT-SYARAT DAN KETENTUAN (TERMS AND CONDITIONS) SICEPAT EKSPRES\",\"authors\":\"Yovie Carissa Kumala, Evelyne Juanda T\",\"doi\":\"10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SICEPAT is one of delivery service in Indonesia that located in Jakarta. As the business owner in running its business for its consumer, SICEPAT already prepared every risks that may be occurred one day. Therefore SICEPAT prepared terms and conditions that can be seen by consumers. Inside the terms and conditions point 7, writers saw that SICEPAT included prohibited stipulation by Article 18 paragraph (1) letter a Consumer Protection Law that is written that SICEPAT Ekspres is not responsible if there is a damage, delay and loss to consumer (exoneration clause), this matter according to Article 18 paragraph (3) is stated void by law. The existence of exoneration clause in an agreement will be harmful to consumer. If the consumer experienced loss it means consumer’s rights as written in Article 4 Consumer Protection Law is violated. Therefore consumer has the right to get the compensation. And business owner as written in Article 7 Consumer Protection Law has the obligation that cannot be ignored. Even in Article 19 paragraph (1) Consumer Protection Law clearly stated that business owner must be responsible to give the compensation for the damages, and due to consuming object and/or service that produced or sold by the business owner, the consumer is able to file a report to SICEPAT Ekspres or do the remedy through court or outside the court (BPSK).\",\"PeriodicalId\":477021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal paradigma hukum pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v4i02.1646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

SICEPAT 是印度尼西亚位于雅加达的一家快递公司。作为为消费者经营业务的企业主,SICEPAT 已经准备好了有朝一日可能发生的各种风险。因此,SICEPAT 制定了消费者可以看到的条款和条件。在条款和条件的第 7 点中,作者看到 SICEPAT 纳入了《消费者保护法》第 18 条第 (1) 款的禁止性规定,即如果对消费者造成损害、延误和损失,SICEPAT Ekspres 不承担责任(免责条款),根据第 18 条第 (3) 款,该事项依法无效。协议中免责条款的存在对消费者不利。如果消费者遭受损失,就意味着《消费者权益保护法》第 4 条规定的消费者权利受到侵犯。因此,消费者有权获得赔偿。而《消费者权益保护法》第 7 条规定的企业主有不可忽视的义务。即使在《消费者权益保护法》第 19 条第 1 款中明确规定,企业主必须负责赔偿损失,并且由于消费了企业主生产或销售的物品和/或服务,消费者可以向 SICEPAT Ekspres 报告或通过法院或法院外(BPSK)进行补救。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP JASA PENGIRIMAN SICEPAT EKSPRES TERKAIT KLAUSULA EKSONERASI DALAM SYARAT-SYARAT DAN KETENTUAN (TERMS AND CONDITIONS) SICEPAT EKSPRES
SICEPAT is one of delivery service in Indonesia that located in Jakarta. As the business owner in running its business for its consumer, SICEPAT already prepared every risks that may be occurred one day. Therefore SICEPAT prepared terms and conditions that can be seen by consumers. Inside the terms and conditions point 7, writers saw that SICEPAT included prohibited stipulation by Article 18 paragraph (1) letter a Consumer Protection Law that is written that SICEPAT Ekspres is not responsible if there is a damage, delay and loss to consumer (exoneration clause), this matter according to Article 18 paragraph (3) is stated void by law. The existence of exoneration clause in an agreement will be harmful to consumer. If the consumer experienced loss it means consumer’s rights as written in Article 4 Consumer Protection Law is violated. Therefore consumer has the right to get the compensation. And business owner as written in Article 7 Consumer Protection Law has the obligation that cannot be ignored. Even in Article 19 paragraph (1) Consumer Protection Law clearly stated that business owner must be responsible to give the compensation for the damages, and due to consuming object and/or service that produced or sold by the business owner, the consumer is able to file a report to SICEPAT Ekspres or do the remedy through court or outside the court (BPSK).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信