Hu Lizi, Kou Jiaojiao, Wang Dan, Wang Shuyao, Wang Qingyuan, Yang Zijiang, Kang Hua
{"title":"非侵入性脑部刺激可改善中枢性卒中后疼痛患者的疼痛：系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hu Lizi, Kou Jiaojiao, Wang Dan, Wang Shuyao, Wang Qingyuan, Yang Zijiang, Kang Hua","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2359341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) significantly interferes with the quality of life and psychological well-being of stroke patients. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has attracted significant attention as an emerging method for treating patients with CPSP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation on pain, and psychological status of patients with central post-stroke pain using meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computerized search of multiple databases was performed for identification of randomized controlled trials involving NIBS-led treatment of CPSP patients. Two researchers worked independently on literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Research was conducted from inception of the database until October 2023. <i>RevMan 5.0</i> and <i>Stata 15.0</i> software were used to conduct statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen papers with 807 patients were finally included. The results showed that NIBS reduced patients' pain intensity [<i>SMD</i> = -0.39, <i>95% CI</i> (-0.54, -0.24), <i>p</i> < 0.01] and was more effective in short-term CPSP patients. However, the included studies did not show a significant impact on psychological status, particularly depression. Subgroup analysis suggested that the M1 stimulation point was more effective than other stimulation points [<i>SMD</i> = -0.45, <i>95% CI</i> (-0.65, -0.25), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Other stimulation modalities also demonstrated favorable outcomes when compared to rTMS [<i>SMD</i> = -0.67, <i>95% CI</i> (-1.09, -0.25), <i>p</i> < 0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIBS has a positive impact on pain relief in patients with CPSP, but does not enhance patients' psychological well-being in terms of anxiety or depression. Furthermore, large-sample, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are needed to explore the benefits of different stimulation durations and parameters in patients with CPSP. The current study has been registered with Prospero under the registration number CRD42023468419.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive brain stimulation improves pain in patients with central post-stroke pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hu Lizi, Kou Jiaojiao, Wang Dan, Wang Shuyao, Wang Qingyuan, Yang Zijiang, Kang Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2359341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) significantly interferes with the quality of life and psychological well-being of stroke patients. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has attracted significant attention as an emerging method for treating patients with CPSP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation on pain, and psychological status of patients with central post-stroke pain using meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computerized search of multiple databases was performed for identification of randomized controlled trials involving NIBS-led treatment of CPSP patients. Two researchers worked independently on literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Research was conducted from inception of the database until October 2023. <i>RevMan 5.0</i> and <i>Stata 15.0</i> software were used to conduct statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen papers with 807 patients were finally included. The results showed that NIBS reduced patients' pain intensity [<i>SMD</i> = -0.39, <i>95% CI</i> (-0.54, -0.24), <i>p</i> < 0.01] and was more effective in short-term CPSP patients. However, the included studies did not show a significant impact on psychological status, particularly depression. Subgroup analysis suggested that the M1 stimulation point was more effective than other stimulation points [<i>SMD</i> = -0.45, <i>95% CI</i> (-0.65, -0.25), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Other stimulation modalities also demonstrated favorable outcomes when compared to rTMS [<i>SMD</i> = -0.67, <i>95% CI</i> (-1.09, -0.25), <i>p</i> < 0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIBS has a positive impact on pain relief in patients with CPSP, but does not enhance patients' psychological well-being in terms of anxiety or depression. Furthermore, large-sample, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are needed to explore the benefits of different stimulation durations and parameters in patients with CPSP. The current study has been registered with Prospero under the registration number CRD42023468419.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2359341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2359341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-invasive brain stimulation improves pain in patients with central post-stroke pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) significantly interferes with the quality of life and psychological well-being of stroke patients. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has attracted significant attention as an emerging method for treating patients with CPSP.
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation on pain, and psychological status of patients with central post-stroke pain using meta-analysis.
Methods: A computerized search of multiple databases was performed for identification of randomized controlled trials involving NIBS-led treatment of CPSP patients. Two researchers worked independently on literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Research was conducted from inception of the database until October 2023. RevMan 5.0 and Stata 15.0 software were used to conduct statistical analysis.
Results: Sixteen papers with 807 patients were finally included. The results showed that NIBS reduced patients' pain intensity [SMD = -0.39, 95% CI (-0.54, -0.24), p < 0.01] and was more effective in short-term CPSP patients. However, the included studies did not show a significant impact on psychological status, particularly depression. Subgroup analysis suggested that the M1 stimulation point was more effective than other stimulation points [SMD = -0.45, 95% CI (-0.65, -0.25), p < 0.001]. Other stimulation modalities also demonstrated favorable outcomes when compared to rTMS [SMD = -0.67, 95% CI (-1.09, -0.25), p < 0.01].
Conclusion: NIBS has a positive impact on pain relief in patients with CPSP, but does not enhance patients' psychological well-being in terms of anxiety or depression. Furthermore, large-sample, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are needed to explore the benefits of different stimulation durations and parameters in patients with CPSP. The current study has been registered with Prospero under the registration number CRD42023468419.
期刊介绍：
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
