{"title":"探索过程评分在阐明影响帕金森病患者言语流畅性的认知和情感因素方面的作用。","authors":"Catie J Wandell, Karen Torres","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional (\"core\") and \"process\" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses (<i>p</i> = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency (<i>p</i> = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance (<i>p</i> = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration (<i>b</i> = -.055, <i>p</i> = .028; <i>b</i> = -.062, <i>p</i> = .004) and final 45-second interval (<i>b</i> = -.072, <i>p</i> = .003; <i>b</i> = -.044, <i>p</i> = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy (<i>b</i> = .616, <i>p</i> = .044) was demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings demonstrate the potential utility of \"process\" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the utility of process scores in elucidating the role of cognitive and affective factors that influence verbal fluency performance in Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Catie J Wandell, Karen Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional (\\\"core\\\") and \\\"process\\\" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses (<i>p</i> = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency (<i>p</i> = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance (<i>p</i> = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration (<i>b</i> = -.055, <i>p</i> = .028; <i>b</i> = -.062, <i>p</i> = .004) and final 45-second interval (<i>b</i> = -.072, <i>p</i> = .003; <i>b</i> = -.044, <i>p</i> = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy (<i>b</i> = .616, <i>p</i> = .044) was demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings demonstrate the potential utility of \\\"process\\\" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2359446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the utility of process scores in elucidating the role of cognitive and affective factors that influence verbal fluency performance in Parkinson's disease.
Objectives: Cognitive and affective factors have been implicated in verbal fluency (VF) performance in Parkinson's disease (PD). This exploratory study aimed to investigate the relationships between cognitive and affective variables on traditional ("core") and "process" (error and interval) scores of VF and elucidate unique information these scores may provide regarding mechanisms underlying VF.
Methods: Sixty-two PD patients without dementia completed clinical neuropsychological examinations consisting of attention, processing speed, language, executive functioning, visuospatial, memory, and mood measures. Hierarchical regression and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate relationships between outcome and predictor variables.
Results: Generativity results revealed that processing speed and working memory explained up to 34% of the variance of total letter fluency responses (p = <.001) and processing speed explained 24% of the variance for total semantic fluency (p = .003). For category switching generativity, only age predicted 20% of the variance (p = .01). Two executive functioning measures were negatively associated with error production over the duration (b = -.055, p = .028; b = -.062, p = .004) and final 45-second interval (b = -.072, p = .003; b = -.044, p = .033) of the category switching task. In the initial 15-second task interval, a positive predictive relationship between error production and indifference apathy (b = .616, p = .044) was demonstrated.
Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the potential utility of "process" scores in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia and tentatively evidence the role of indifference apathy in task initiation.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.