舌鳞状细胞癌患者术中使用三维超声评估工具的准确性与组织病理学的临床验证比较。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08753-3
N M Bekedam, E L Koot, E M V de Cuba, M J A van Alphen, R L P van Veen, L H E Karssemakers, L E Smeele, M B Karakullukcu
{"title":"舌鳞状细胞癌患者术中使用三维超声评估工具的准确性与组织病理学的临床验证比较。","authors":"N M Bekedam, E L Koot, E M V de Cuba, M J A van Alphen, R L P van Veen, L H E Karssemakers, L E Smeele, M B Karakullukcu","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08753-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Histopathological analysis often shows close resection margins after surgical removal of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). This study aimed to investigate the agreement between intraoperative 3D ultrasound (US) margin assessment and postoperative histopathology of resected TSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, ten patients were prospectively included. Three fiducial cannulas were inserted into the specimen. To acquire a motorized 3D US volume, the resected specimen was submerged in saline, after which images were acquired while the probe moved over the specimen. The US volumes were annotated twice: (1) automatically and (2) manually, with the automatic segmentation as initialization. After standardized histopathological processing, all hematoxylin-eosin whole slide images (WSI) were included for analysis. Corresponding US images were found based on the known WSI spacing and fiducials. Blinded observers measured the tumor thickness and the margin in the caudal, deep, and cranial directions on every slide. The anterior and posterior margin was measured per specimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in all measurements between manually segmented US and histopathology was 2.34 (SD: ±3.34) mm, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.733 (p < 0.001). The smallest mean difference was in the tumor thickness with 0.80 (SD: ±2.44) mm and a correlation of 0.836 (p < 0.001). Limitations were observed in the caudal region, where no correlation was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that 3D US and histopathology have a moderate to strong statistically significant correlation (r = 0.733; p < 0.001) and a mean difference between the modalities of 2.3 mm (95%CI: -4.2; 8.9). Future research should focus on patient outcomes regarding resection margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of the accuracy of an intra-operative assessment tool using 3D ultrasound compared to histopathology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.\",\"authors\":\"N M Bekedam, E L Koot, E M V de Cuba, M J A van Alphen, R L P van Veen, L H E Karssemakers, L E Smeele, M B Karakullukcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08753-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Histopathological analysis often shows close resection margins after surgical removal of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). This study aimed to investigate the agreement between intraoperative 3D ultrasound (US) margin assessment and postoperative histopathology of resected TSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, ten patients were prospectively included. Three fiducial cannulas were inserted into the specimen. To acquire a motorized 3D US volume, the resected specimen was submerged in saline, after which images were acquired while the probe moved over the specimen. The US volumes were annotated twice: (1) automatically and (2) manually, with the automatic segmentation as initialization. After standardized histopathological processing, all hematoxylin-eosin whole slide images (WSI) were included for analysis. Corresponding US images were found based on the known WSI spacing and fiducials. Blinded observers measured the tumor thickness and the margin in the caudal, deep, and cranial directions on every slide. The anterior and posterior margin was measured per specimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in all measurements between manually segmented US and histopathology was 2.34 (SD: ±3.34) mm, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.733 (p < 0.001). The smallest mean difference was in the tumor thickness with 0.80 (SD: ±2.44) mm and a correlation of 0.836 (p < 0.001). Limitations were observed in the caudal region, where no correlation was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that 3D US and histopathology have a moderate to strong statistically significant correlation (r = 0.733; p < 0.001) and a mean difference between the modalities of 2.3 mm (95%CI: -4.2; 8.9). Future research should focus on patient outcomes regarding resection margins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08753-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08753-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:组织病理学分析显示,舌鳞状细胞癌(TSCC)手术切除后的切除边缘通常很近。本研究旨在探讨术中三维超声(US)边缘评估与切除的 TSCC 术后组织病理学之间的一致性:方法:本研究前瞻性地纳入了 10 例患者。在标本中插入三个靶标插管。为了获取电动三维 US 体积,切除的标本浸没在生理盐水中,然后在探针在标本上移动的同时获取图像。对 US 图像进行两次标注:(1) 自动标注;(2) 手动标注,并将自动分割作为初始化。经过标准化组织病理学处理后,所有苏木精-伊红全玻片图像(WSI)都被纳入分析范围。根据已知的 WSI 间距和靶标找到相应的 US 图像。双盲观察员测量每张切片上肿瘤的厚度以及尾部、深部和头颅方向的边缘。每个标本的前后边缘都进行了测量:结果:手动分割的 US 和组织病理学所有测量值的平均值相差 2.34(SD:±3.34)毫米,斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为 0.733(P 结论:三维 US 和组织病理学测量值的平均值相差 2.34(SD:±3.34)毫米,斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为 0.733:这项研究表明,三维 US 和组织病理学在统计学上具有中度到高度的相关性(r = 0.733; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical validation of the accuracy of an intra-operative assessment tool using 3D ultrasound compared to histopathology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

Clinical validation of the accuracy of an intra-operative assessment tool using 3D ultrasound compared to histopathology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

Background: Histopathological analysis often shows close resection margins after surgical removal of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). This study aimed to investigate the agreement between intraoperative 3D ultrasound (US) margin assessment and postoperative histopathology of resected TSCC.

Methods: In this study, ten patients were prospectively included. Three fiducial cannulas were inserted into the specimen. To acquire a motorized 3D US volume, the resected specimen was submerged in saline, after which images were acquired while the probe moved over the specimen. The US volumes were annotated twice: (1) automatically and (2) manually, with the automatic segmentation as initialization. After standardized histopathological processing, all hematoxylin-eosin whole slide images (WSI) were included for analysis. Corresponding US images were found based on the known WSI spacing and fiducials. Blinded observers measured the tumor thickness and the margin in the caudal, deep, and cranial directions on every slide. The anterior and posterior margin was measured per specimen.

Results: The mean difference in all measurements between manually segmented US and histopathology was 2.34 (SD: ±3.34) mm, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.733 (p < 0.001). The smallest mean difference was in the tumor thickness with 0.80 (SD: ±2.44) mm and a correlation of 0.836 (p < 0.001). Limitations were observed in the caudal region, where no correlation was found.

Conclusion: This study shows that 3D US and histopathology have a moderate to strong statistically significant correlation (r = 0.733; p < 0.001) and a mean difference between the modalities of 2.3 mm (95%CI: -4.2; 8.9). Future research should focus on patient outcomes regarding resection margins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信