评估急诊科实施最佳疼痛管理实践的障碍、支持和背景:IMPAINED 研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"评估急诊科实施最佳疼痛管理实践的障碍、支持和背景:IMPAINED 研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the emergency department practice context and identify strategies to improve outcomes of patients with acute pain.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Effective treatment of acute pain in the emergency department depends upon clinicians adopting pain interventions into practice. However, it is well-recognized that acute pain is often undertreated. The local practice context strongly influences clinicians’ adoption of interventions into their clinical practice. An assessment of this practice context can inform implementation interventions and strategies to improve outcomes for patients with acute pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Chart audit, staff survey, and staff working groups were conducted from June 2020 to May 2021 Data were analyzed and synthesized across sources informed by assessment elements of the Ottawa model of research use (OMRU) implementation model and expert recommendations for implementing change strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The OMRU facilitated contextual assessment of pain treatment practice in the emergency department and the development of implementation strategies. Adoption of evidence-based pain interventions was low in the sample studied. Workflow and workload were the primary barriers to evidence-based pain practices by potential adopters, while positive beliefs and high awareness of evidence-based pain interventions were supportive factors. Implementation strategies were informed by assessment findings and mapped to the Ottawa model and expert recommendations for implementing change elements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The adoption of evidence into practice in the emergency department relies upon a comprehensive assessment of the local context. The use of the OMRU assessment process resulted in meaningful engagement with staff and a deeper understanding of local pain management practices. Clinicians view evidence-based pain management as important, however, there are competing priorities within the emergency department, such as patient flow and triage. This study provides an exemplar of utilizing an implementation framework to identify pain practices within the emergency department.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Implications</h3><p>Achieving impactful change in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes should start with the application of implementation methods that enable comprehensive analysis of the local practice context. The assessment should begin with collaboration with local clinicians that persist throughout the life of the study to ensure change is sustainable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 346-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001085/pdfft?md5=699921539841e4db36e6d2a695e712d7&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224001085-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Barriers, Supports, and Context to Implement Best Practice Pain Management in the Emergency Department: The IMPAINED Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the emergency department practice context and identify strategies to improve outcomes of patients with acute pain.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Effective treatment of acute pain in the emergency department depends upon clinicians adopting pain interventions into practice. However, it is well-recognized that acute pain is often undertreated. The local practice context strongly influences clinicians’ adoption of interventions into their clinical practice. An assessment of this practice context can inform implementation interventions and strategies to improve outcomes for patients with acute pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Chart audit, staff survey, and staff working groups were conducted from June 2020 to May 2021 Data were analyzed and synthesized across sources informed by assessment elements of the Ottawa model of research use (OMRU) implementation model and expert recommendations for implementing change strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The OMRU facilitated contextual assessment of pain treatment practice in the emergency department and the development of implementation strategies. Adoption of evidence-based pain interventions was low in the sample studied. Workflow and workload were the primary barriers to evidence-based pain practices by potential adopters, while positive beliefs and high awareness of evidence-based pain interventions were supportive factors. Implementation strategies were informed by assessment findings and mapped to the Ottawa model and expert recommendations for implementing change elements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The adoption of evidence into practice in the emergency department relies upon a comprehensive assessment of the local context. The use of the OMRU assessment process resulted in meaningful engagement with staff and a deeper understanding of local pain management practices. Clinicians view evidence-based pain management as important, however, there are competing priorities within the emergency department, such as patient flow and triage. This study provides an exemplar of utilizing an implementation framework to identify pain practices within the emergency department.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Implications</h3><p>Achieving impactful change in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes should start with the application of implementation methods that enable comprehensive analysis of the local practice context. The assessment should begin with collaboration with local clinicians that persist throughout the life of the study to ensure change is sustainable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 346-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001085/pdfft?md5=699921539841e4db36e6d2a695e712d7&pid=1-s2.0-S1524904224001085-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估急诊科的实践背景,确定改善急性疼痛患者治疗效果的策略:急诊科对急性疼痛的有效治疗取决于临床医生是否将疼痛干预措施付诸实践。背景:急诊科急性疼痛的有效治疗有赖于临床医生在实践中采取疼痛干预措施。然而,人们普遍认识到,急性疼痛往往得不到充分治疗。当地的实践环境对临床医生在临床实践中采用干预措施有很大影响。对这一实践环境进行评估可为实施干预措施和策略提供依据,从而改善急性疼痛患者的治疗效果:从 2020 年 6 月到 2021 年 5 月,我们开展了病历审核、员工调查和员工工作组活动,并根据渥太华研究使用模式(OMRU)实施模型的评估要素和专家对实施变革策略的建议,对各种来源的数据进行了分析和综合:结果:渥太华研究使用模式促进了对急诊科疼痛治疗实践的背景评估和实施策略的制定。在研究的样本中,循证疼痛干预措施的采用率较低。工作流程和工作量是潜在采用者采用循证疼痛实践的主要障碍,而积极的信念和对循证疼痛干预措施的高度认识则是支持因素。实施策略参考了评估结果,并与渥太华模式和专家建议的实施变革要素相匹配:结论:在急诊科采用循证实践有赖于对当地环境的全面评估。通过使用 OMRU 评估流程,工作人员进行了有意义的参与,并加深了对当地疼痛管理实践的了解。临床医生认为循证疼痛管理非常重要,然而,急诊科内部也存在一些相互竞争的优先事项,如病人流量和分流。本研究提供了一个范例,利用实施框架来确定急诊科内的疼痛实践:临床意义:要在临床实践中实现有影响力的变革以改善患者预后,首先应采用能够全面分析当地实践环境的实施方法。评估应从与当地临床医生合作开始,并在整个研究过程中持续进行,以确保变革的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Barriers, Supports, and Context to Implement Best Practice Pain Management in the Emergency Department: The IMPAINED Study

Aim

To assess the emergency department practice context and identify strategies to improve outcomes of patients with acute pain.

Background

Effective treatment of acute pain in the emergency department depends upon clinicians adopting pain interventions into practice. However, it is well-recognized that acute pain is often undertreated. The local practice context strongly influences clinicians’ adoption of interventions into their clinical practice. An assessment of this practice context can inform implementation interventions and strategies to improve outcomes for patients with acute pain.

Methods

Chart audit, staff survey, and staff working groups were conducted from June 2020 to May 2021 Data were analyzed and synthesized across sources informed by assessment elements of the Ottawa model of research use (OMRU) implementation model and expert recommendations for implementing change strategies.

Results

The OMRU facilitated contextual assessment of pain treatment practice in the emergency department and the development of implementation strategies. Adoption of evidence-based pain interventions was low in the sample studied. Workflow and workload were the primary barriers to evidence-based pain practices by potential adopters, while positive beliefs and high awareness of evidence-based pain interventions were supportive factors. Implementation strategies were informed by assessment findings and mapped to the Ottawa model and expert recommendations for implementing change elements.

Conclusion

The adoption of evidence into practice in the emergency department relies upon a comprehensive assessment of the local context. The use of the OMRU assessment process resulted in meaningful engagement with staff and a deeper understanding of local pain management practices. Clinicians view evidence-based pain management as important, however, there are competing priorities within the emergency department, such as patient flow and triage. This study provides an exemplar of utilizing an implementation framework to identify pain practices within the emergency department.

Clinical Implications

Achieving impactful change in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes should start with the application of implementation methods that enable comprehensive analysis of the local practice context. The assessment should begin with collaboration with local clinicians that persist throughout the life of the study to ensure change is sustainable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信