{"title":"冠状动脉阻塞和冠状动脉痉挛患者非阻塞性狭窄部位和阻塞性狭窄部位诱发痉挛的重要性。","authors":"Shozo Sueda, Yutaka Hayashi","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are few reports regarding the prognosis in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) and vasospastic angina (VSA). This study investigated the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with VSA and OCAD, especially regarding provoked spasm phenotypes and sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study of 403 patients with typical or atypical angina-like chest pain undergoing acetylcholine (ACH) spasm provocation testing and OCAD. An obstructed coronary artery was defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing. We defined positive epicardial spasm as ≥90% transient stenosis and usual chest symptoms or ischemic ECG changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among these 403 patients with OCAD, positive spasm by intracoronary ACH testing was observed in 196 patients (49%), whereas negative spasm was found in the remaining 207 patients (51%). The clinical outcomes in the patients with OCAD and provoked spasm were not different according to the provoked-spasm phenotypes. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes were unsatisfactory in the patients with spasm at the site of nonobstructive lesion alone compared with those with spasm at the site of obstructive and nonobstructive lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We should precisely diagnose patients with OCAD who have provoked spasm by using intracoronary ACH testing and medicate the nonobstructive vessels in patients with OCAD and VSA under optimal coronary vasodilators.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"650-658"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of provoked spasms at the sites of nonobstructive stenosis as well as at the sites of obstructive stenosis in patients with obstructive coronary arteries and coronary spasm.\",\"authors\":\"Shozo Sueda, Yutaka Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are few reports regarding the prognosis in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) and vasospastic angina (VSA). This study investigated the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with VSA and OCAD, especially regarding provoked spasm phenotypes and sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study of 403 patients with typical or atypical angina-like chest pain undergoing acetylcholine (ACH) spasm provocation testing and OCAD. An obstructed coronary artery was defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing. We defined positive epicardial spasm as ≥90% transient stenosis and usual chest symptoms or ischemic ECG changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among these 403 patients with OCAD, positive spasm by intracoronary ACH testing was observed in 196 patients (49%), whereas negative spasm was found in the remaining 207 patients (51%). The clinical outcomes in the patients with OCAD and provoked spasm were not different according to the provoked-spasm phenotypes. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes were unsatisfactory in the patients with spasm at the site of nonobstructive lesion alone compared with those with spasm at the site of obstructive and nonobstructive lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We should precisely diagnose patients with OCAD who have provoked spasm by using intracoronary ACH testing and medicate the nonobstructive vessels in patients with OCAD and VSA under optimal coronary vasodilators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"650-658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:有关阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(OCAD)和血管痉挛性心绞痛(VSA)患者预后的报道很少。本研究调查了 VSA 和 OCAD 患者的临床特征和临床预后,尤其是诱发痉挛的表型和部位:这是一项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究,研究对象是接受乙酰胆碱(ACH)痉挛激发试验和 OCAD 的 403 名典型或不典型心绞痛样胸痛患者。冠状动脉阻塞定义为管腔狭窄≥50%。我们将心外膜痉挛阳性定义为≥90%的一过性狭窄和通常的胸部症状或缺血性心电图改变:在这 403 名 OCAD 患者中,196 名患者(49%)通过冠脉内 ACH 检测发现心外膜痉挛阳性,而其余 207 名患者(51%)发现心外膜痉挛阴性。根据诱发痉挛表型的不同,OCAD 患者和诱发痉挛患者的临床预后也不尽相同。此外,仅在非阻塞性病变部位发生痉挛的患者与在阻塞性和非阻塞性病变部位发生痉挛的患者相比,临床疗效并不理想:结论:我们应通过冠状动脉内 ACH 检测准确诊断诱发痉挛的 OCAD 患者,并在最佳冠状动脉血管扩张剂的作用下对 OCAD 和 VSA 患者的非阻塞性血管进行药物治疗。
Importance of provoked spasms at the sites of nonobstructive stenosis as well as at the sites of obstructive stenosis in patients with obstructive coronary arteries and coronary spasm.
Objectives: There are few reports regarding the prognosis in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) and vasospastic angina (VSA). This study investigated the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with VSA and OCAD, especially regarding provoked spasm phenotypes and sites.
Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study of 403 patients with typical or atypical angina-like chest pain undergoing acetylcholine (ACH) spasm provocation testing and OCAD. An obstructed coronary artery was defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing. We defined positive epicardial spasm as ≥90% transient stenosis and usual chest symptoms or ischemic ECG changes.
Results: Among these 403 patients with OCAD, positive spasm by intracoronary ACH testing was observed in 196 patients (49%), whereas negative spasm was found in the remaining 207 patients (51%). The clinical outcomes in the patients with OCAD and provoked spasm were not different according to the provoked-spasm phenotypes. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes were unsatisfactory in the patients with spasm at the site of nonobstructive lesion alone compared with those with spasm at the site of obstructive and nonobstructive lesions.
Conclusion: We should precisely diagnose patients with OCAD who have provoked spasm by using intracoronary ACH testing and medicate the nonobstructive vessels in patients with OCAD and VSA under optimal coronary vasodilators.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.