{"title":"现象学数据分析的反思性实践框架","authors":"Olga Rotar","doi":"10.1007/s11213-024-09677-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In phenomenographic studies, the use of reflection is not commonly reported. Drawing on the different schools of thought and reported frameworks, this paper introduces the Reflective Practice Framework for phenomenographic data analysis. The article describes theoretical stances and constituent elements of the framework, which consist of the two levels and five steps of reflection. The application of the framework allows for a systemic account of situational factors and personal influences during the process of phenomenographic data analysis. The framework provides a clear-cut guideline for novice phenomenographers on how to maintain reflection when working on the analysis of unstructured phenomenographic data and considering assumptions, biases, and alternative perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51694,"journal":{"name":"Systemic Practice and Action Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reflective Practice Framework for Phenomenographic Data Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Olga Rotar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11213-024-09677-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In phenomenographic studies, the use of reflection is not commonly reported. Drawing on the different schools of thought and reported frameworks, this paper introduces the Reflective Practice Framework for phenomenographic data analysis. The article describes theoretical stances and constituent elements of the framework, which consist of the two levels and five steps of reflection. The application of the framework allows for a systemic account of situational factors and personal influences during the process of phenomenographic data analysis. The framework provides a clear-cut guideline for novice phenomenographers on how to maintain reflection when working on the analysis of unstructured phenomenographic data and considering assumptions, biases, and alternative perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systemic Practice and Action Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systemic Practice and Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09677-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systemic Practice and Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09677-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Reflective Practice Framework for Phenomenographic Data Analysis
In phenomenographic studies, the use of reflection is not commonly reported. Drawing on the different schools of thought and reported frameworks, this paper introduces the Reflective Practice Framework for phenomenographic data analysis. The article describes theoretical stances and constituent elements of the framework, which consist of the two levels and five steps of reflection. The application of the framework allows for a systemic account of situational factors and personal influences during the process of phenomenographic data analysis. The framework provides a clear-cut guideline for novice phenomenographers on how to maintain reflection when working on the analysis of unstructured phenomenographic data and considering assumptions, biases, and alternative perspectives.
期刊介绍：
Systemic Practice and Action Research is dedicated to advancing deeper understandings of issues that confront the contemporary world, and better means for engaging with these issues for the benefit of individuals, organizations, communities and their natural environments. To this end, a fundamental rethink of the purposes and methods of science is needed, making it more systemic and action-orientated. The journal therefore seeks to make a substantial contribution to rethinking science as well as to the reflective application of systemic practice and action research in all types of organizational and social settings. This international journal is committed to nurturing wide-ranging conversations around both qualitative and technical approaches for the betterment of people''s lives and ways of working together. It seeks to influence policy and strategy in its advocacy of action research as a primary means to gain vision and leverage in wicked problem areas. All forms of investigation and reasoning are considered potentially suitable for publication, including personal experience. There are no priorities attached to settings for studies and no greater significance given to one methodological style over another - as long as the work demonstrates a reflective and systemic quality. The journal welcomes manuscripts that are original, are well written, and contain a vivid argument. Papers normally will demonstrate knowledge of existing literature. Full papers are normally between 5,000 – 10,000 words (although longer papers will not be excluded if the argument justifies the word count) and short papers are about 2,000 words. Notes and letters are welcomed for publication in the ''notes from the field'' and ''letters'' sections. A rigorous mentoring-based refereeing system is applied in all cases. Officially cited as: Syst Pract Action Res
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
