Lily K. Bentley, Richard A. Phillips, Tegan Carpenter-Kling, Robert J. M. Crawford, Richard J. Cuthbert, Karine Delord, Ben J. Dilley, Azwianewi B. Makhado, Peter I. Miller, Steffen Oppel, Pierre A. Pistorius, Peter G. Ryan, Stefan Schoombie, Henri Weimerskirch, Andrea Manica
{"title":"同栖和异栖信天翁对栖息地的偏好","authors":"Lily K. Bentley, Richard A. Phillips, Tegan Carpenter-Kling, Robert J. M. Crawford, Richard J. Cuthbert, Karine Delord, Ben J. Dilley, Azwianewi B. Makhado, Peter I. Miller, Steffen Oppel, Pierre A. Pistorius, Peter G. Ryan, Stefan Schoombie, Henri Weimerskirch, Andrea Manica","doi":"10.1111/jbi.14966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Competition is often proposed to drive niche segregation along multiple axes in speciose communities. Understanding spatial partitioning of foraging areas is particularly important in species that are constrained to a central place. We present a natural experiment examining variation in habitat preferences of congeneric Southern Ocean predators in sympatry and allopatry. Our aim was to ascertain consistency of habitat preferences within species, and to test whether preferences changed in the presence of the congener.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Southern Hemisphere.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxon</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple colonies of both species within the genus <i>Phoebetria</i> (sooty albatrosses).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The two <i>Phoebetria</i> albatrosses breed on islands located from ~37–55°S – sooty albatrosses (<i>P. fusca</i>) in the north and light-mantled albatrosses (<i>P. palpebrata</i>) in the south – with sympatric overlap at locations ~46–49°S. We analysed GPS and PTT tracks from 87 individuals and multiple remotely sensed environmental variables using GAMs, to determine and compare the key factors influencing habitat preference for each species at each breeding colony.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While foraging habitat preferences are consistent in light-mantled albatrosses, there is divergence of preferences in sooty albatrosses depending on whether they are in sympatry with their congener or in allopatry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study represents the most comprehensive work on this genus to date and highlights how habitat preferences and behavioural plasticity may influence species distributions under different competitive conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbi.14966","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habitat preferences of Phoebetria albatrosses in sympatry and allopatry\",\"authors\":\"Lily K. Bentley, Richard A. Phillips, Tegan Carpenter-Kling, Robert J. M. Crawford, Richard J. Cuthbert, Karine Delord, Ben J. Dilley, Azwianewi B. Makhado, Peter I. Miller, Steffen Oppel, Pierre A. Pistorius, Peter G. Ryan, Stefan Schoombie, Henri Weimerskirch, Andrea Manica\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.14966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Competition is often proposed to drive niche segregation along multiple axes in speciose communities. Understanding spatial partitioning of foraging areas is particularly important in species that are constrained to a central place. We present a natural experiment examining variation in habitat preferences of congeneric Southern Ocean predators in sympatry and allopatry. Our aim was to ascertain consistency of habitat preferences within species, and to test whether preferences changed in the presence of the congener.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Southern Hemisphere.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxon</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple colonies of both species within the genus <i>Phoebetria</i> (sooty albatrosses).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The two <i>Phoebetria</i> albatrosses breed on islands located from ~37–55°S – sooty albatrosses (<i>P. fusca</i>) in the north and light-mantled albatrosses (<i>P. palpebrata</i>) in the south – with sympatric overlap at locations ~46–49°S. We analysed GPS and PTT tracks from 87 individuals and multiple remotely sensed environmental variables using GAMs, to determine and compare the key factors influencing habitat preference for each species at each breeding colony.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>While foraging habitat preferences are consistent in light-mantled albatrosses, there is divergence of preferences in sooty albatrosses depending on whether they are in sympatry with their congener or in allopatry.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study represents the most comprehensive work on this genus to date and highlights how habitat preferences and behavioural plasticity may influence species distributions under different competitive conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbi.14966\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.14966\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.14966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Habitat preferences of Phoebetria albatrosses in sympatry and allopatry
Aim
Competition is often proposed to drive niche segregation along multiple axes in speciose communities. Understanding spatial partitioning of foraging areas is particularly important in species that are constrained to a central place. We present a natural experiment examining variation in habitat preferences of congeneric Southern Ocean predators in sympatry and allopatry. Our aim was to ascertain consistency of habitat preferences within species, and to test whether preferences changed in the presence of the congener.
Location
Southern Hemisphere.
Taxon
Multiple colonies of both species within the genus Phoebetria (sooty albatrosses).
Methods
The two Phoebetria albatrosses breed on islands located from ~37–55°S – sooty albatrosses (P. fusca) in the north and light-mantled albatrosses (P. palpebrata) in the south – with sympatric overlap at locations ~46–49°S. We analysed GPS and PTT tracks from 87 individuals and multiple remotely sensed environmental variables using GAMs, to determine and compare the key factors influencing habitat preference for each species at each breeding colony.
Results
While foraging habitat preferences are consistent in light-mantled albatrosses, there is divergence of preferences in sooty albatrosses depending on whether they are in sympatry with their congener or in allopatry.
Main Conclusions
This study represents the most comprehensive work on this genus to date and highlights how habitat preferences and behavioural plasticity may influence species distributions under different competitive conditions.
期刊介绍:
Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.