在高度近视眼白内障手术中植入预防性囊袋拉力环的效果

Xiaoxin Hu, Jiao Qi, Kaiwen Cheng, Wenwen He, Keke Zhang, Chen Zhao, Yi Lu, Xiangjia Zhu
{"title":"在高度近视眼白内障手术中植入预防性囊袋拉力环的效果","authors":"Xiaoxin Hu, Jiao Qi, Kaiwen Cheng, Wenwen He, Keke Zhang, Chen Zhao, Yi Lu, Xiangjia Zhu","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation during cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes. Setting: EENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Consecutive highly myopic patients treated with cataract surgery were recruited and randomized to undergo CTR implantation or not. The outcomes compared between the two groups included axial lens position (ALP), intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt, area of anterior capsule opening, severity of anterior capsular opacification (ACO), and posterior capsular opacification (PCO) at 1 year after surgery. Results: A total of 55 highly myopic eyes with CTRs implanted and 55 without were included in the analysis. At 1 year after surgery, no significant differences were detected between the CTR and non-CTR groups for the mean ALP, IOL decentration, or tilt (all P &gt; 0.05). However, the CTR group had a significantly larger area of anterior capsule opening (23.62 ± 3.30 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> vs. 21.85 ± 2.30 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, P = 0.003), and less severe ACO (P = 0.033) and PCO (PCO-3 mm: 0.06 ± 0.13 vs. 0.13 ± 0.20, P = 0.038; PCO-C: 0.15 ± 0.18 vs. 0.25 ± 0.26, P = 0.026) than the non-CTR group. The corrected distance visual acuity, prediction error, and high-order aberrations did not differ between the two groups (all P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions: In highly myopic eyes, although prophylactic CTR implantation can reduce the severity of capsular contraction and opacification, it does not significantly affect postoperative IOL stability or visual outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of prophylactic capsular tension ring implantation during cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxin Hu, Jiao Qi, Kaiwen Cheng, Wenwen He, Keke Zhang, Chen Zhao, Yi Lu, Xiangjia Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation during cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes. Setting: EENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Consecutive highly myopic patients treated with cataract surgery were recruited and randomized to undergo CTR implantation or not. The outcomes compared between the two groups included axial lens position (ALP), intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt, area of anterior capsule opening, severity of anterior capsular opacification (ACO), and posterior capsular opacification (PCO) at 1 year after surgery. Results: A total of 55 highly myopic eyes with CTRs implanted and 55 without were included in the analysis. At 1 year after surgery, no significant differences were detected between the CTR and non-CTR groups for the mean ALP, IOL decentration, or tilt (all P &gt; 0.05). However, the CTR group had a significantly larger area of anterior capsule opening (23.62 ± 3.30 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> vs. 21.85 ± 2.30 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, P = 0.003), and less severe ACO (P = 0.033) and PCO (PCO-3 mm: 0.06 ± 0.13 vs. 0.13 ± 0.20, P = 0.038; PCO-C: 0.15 ± 0.18 vs. 0.25 ± 0.26, P = 0.026) than the non-CTR group. The corrected distance visual acuity, prediction error, and high-order aberrations did not differ between the two groups (all P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions: In highly myopic eyes, although prophylactic CTR implantation can reduce the severity of capsular contraction and opacification, it does not significantly affect postoperative IOL stability or visual outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 评估在高度近视眼的白内障手术中植入预防性囊膜张力环(CTR)的效果。地点: 中国上海复旦大学附属东方医院中国上海复旦大学附属东方医院 设计:前瞻性队列研究。研究方法招募连续接受白内障手术治疗的高度近视患者,随机决定是否进行 CTR 植入术。两组患者术后 1 年的视力比较结果包括晶状体轴位(ALP)、人工晶体(IOL)分散和倾斜度、前囊开口面积、前囊不透明(ACO)严重程度和后囊不透明(PCO)。结果:共有 55 只植入了 CTR 的高度近视眼和 55 只未植入 CTR 的高度近视眼参与了分析。术后 1 年,CTR 组与未植入 CTR 组在平均 ALP、人工晶体分散度或倾斜度方面无明显差异(均为 P > 0.05)。然而,与非 CTR 组相比,CTR 组的前囊开口面积明显更大(23.62 ± 3.30 mm2 vs. 21.85 ± 2.30 mm2,P = 0.003),ACO(P = 0.033)和 PCO(PCO-3 mm:0.06 ± 0.13 vs. 0.13 ± 0.20,P = 0.038;PCO-C:0.15 ± 0.18 vs. 0.25 ± 0.26,P = 0.026)的严重程度较轻。两组的矫正远视力、预测误差和高阶像差没有差异(均为 P > 0.05)。结论:在高度近视眼中,虽然预防性植入 CTR 可以降低囊膜收缩和混浊的严重程度,但对术后人工晶体的稳定性和视觉效果并无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of prophylactic capsular tension ring implantation during cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation during cataract surgery in highly myopic eyes. Setting: EENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Consecutive highly myopic patients treated with cataract surgery were recruited and randomized to undergo CTR implantation or not. The outcomes compared between the two groups included axial lens position (ALP), intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt, area of anterior capsule opening, severity of anterior capsular opacification (ACO), and posterior capsular opacification (PCO) at 1 year after surgery. Results: A total of 55 highly myopic eyes with CTRs implanted and 55 without were included in the analysis. At 1 year after surgery, no significant differences were detected between the CTR and non-CTR groups for the mean ALP, IOL decentration, or tilt (all P > 0.05). However, the CTR group had a significantly larger area of anterior capsule opening (23.62 ± 3.30 mm2 vs. 21.85 ± 2.30 mm2, P = 0.003), and less severe ACO (P = 0.033) and PCO (PCO-3 mm: 0.06 ± 0.13 vs. 0.13 ± 0.20, P = 0.038; PCO-C: 0.15 ± 0.18 vs. 0.25 ± 0.26, P = 0.026) than the non-CTR group. The corrected distance visual acuity, prediction error, and high-order aberrations did not differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In highly myopic eyes, although prophylactic CTR implantation can reduce the severity of capsular contraction and opacification, it does not significantly affect postoperative IOL stability or visual outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信