对抗种族主义--霸权社会心理学标准教学法中的无知无畏

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Glenn Adams, Syed Muhammad Omar
{"title":"对抗种族主义--霸权社会心理学标准教学法中的无知无畏","authors":"Glenn Adams,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Omar","doi":"10.1111/josi.12618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A core tenet of Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an understanding of systemic racism as a defining and constitutive feature of the Eurocentric modern order. In contrast to this foundational insight, discussions in hegemonic social psychology tend to approach racism in a manner—specifically, as prejudice and individual bias—that abstracts the topic from social and historical context. We consider this proposition via an analysis of standard textbooks for undergraduate courses in social psychology. Our review reveals that standard textbooks do not include racism, per se, as a topic of investigation; instead, they tend to consider racism-relevant topics as specific cases of supposedly more basic (and therefore more general) processes of cognition or affect. We conclude the article by drawing on textbooks from South African settings and perspectives of decolonial theory (i.e., examples of social psychologies <i>Other</i>-wise) as resources to re-think hegemonic social psychology in directions that resonate more clearly with a CRT emphasis on the systematicity of racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"80 2","pages":"607-628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12618","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confronting Racism-evasive Ignorance in Standard Pedagogy of Hegemonic Social Psychology\",\"authors\":\"Glenn Adams,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Omar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josi.12618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A core tenet of Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an understanding of systemic racism as a defining and constitutive feature of the Eurocentric modern order. In contrast to this foundational insight, discussions in hegemonic social psychology tend to approach racism in a manner—specifically, as prejudice and individual bias—that abstracts the topic from social and historical context. We consider this proposition via an analysis of standard textbooks for undergraduate courses in social psychology. Our review reveals that standard textbooks do not include racism, per se, as a topic of investigation; instead, they tend to consider racism-relevant topics as specific cases of supposedly more basic (and therefore more general) processes of cognition or affect. We conclude the article by drawing on textbooks from South African settings and perspectives of decolonial theory (i.e., examples of social psychologies <i>Other</i>-wise) as resources to re-think hegemonic social psychology in directions that resonate more clearly with a CRT emphasis on the systematicity of racism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"607-628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12618\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12618\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批判种族理论(Critical Race Theory,CRT)的核心宗旨是将系统性种族主义理解为以欧洲为中心的现代秩序的决定性和构成性特征。与这一基础性见解相反,霸权社会心理学的讨论倾向于以偏见和个人偏见的方式来探讨种族主义,从而将这一话题从社会和历史背景中抽象出来。我们通过分析社会心理学本科课程的标准教科书来探讨这一命题。我们的研究发现,标准教科书并没有将种族主义本身作为一个研究课题;相反,它们倾向于将与种族主义相关的课题视为所谓更基本(因而更普遍)的认知或情感过程的具体案例。文章的最后,我们借鉴了南非的教科书和非殖民化理论的观点(即他者社会心理学的例子),将其作为重新思考霸权社会心理学的资源,使其与 CRT 对种族主义系统性的强调产生更明确的共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confronting Racism-evasive Ignorance in Standard Pedagogy of Hegemonic Social Psychology

A core tenet of Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an understanding of systemic racism as a defining and constitutive feature of the Eurocentric modern order. In contrast to this foundational insight, discussions in hegemonic social psychology tend to approach racism in a manner—specifically, as prejudice and individual bias—that abstracts the topic from social and historical context. We consider this proposition via an analysis of standard textbooks for undergraduate courses in social psychology. Our review reveals that standard textbooks do not include racism, per se, as a topic of investigation; instead, they tend to consider racism-relevant topics as specific cases of supposedly more basic (and therefore more general) processes of cognition or affect. We conclude the article by drawing on textbooks from South African settings and perspectives of decolonial theory (i.e., examples of social psychologies Other-wise) as resources to re-think hegemonic social psychology in directions that resonate more clearly with a CRT emphasis on the systematicity of racism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信