估算多个湖泊淡水浮游动物的 δ13C 和 δ15N 同位素特征的乙醇校正因子

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
Tristan Blechinger, Denver Link, Jenna K.R. Nelson, Gretchen J.A. Hansen
{"title":"估算多个湖泊淡水浮游动物的 δ13C 和 δ15N 同位素特征的乙醇校正因子","authors":"Tristan Blechinger,&nbsp;Denver Link,&nbsp;Jenna K.R. Nelson,&nbsp;Gretchen J.A. Hansen","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In freshwater systems, δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N stable isotopes can be used to differentiate between pelagic and littoral energy sources and to quantify trophic position. In these ecosystems, crustacean zooplankton are frequently used to characterize the pelagic baseline. Zooplankton samples are often preserved prior to processing and analysis, which can affect isotopic signatures. Variability in preservation effects across studies make it difficult to determine if and how to correct for preservation effects. Here, we develop a correction factor for ethanol preservation and present a flexible statistical method that can be updated with additional data to increase its applicability. We collected zooplankton from five lakes in Minnesota, USA encompassing wide isotopic ranges (δ<sup>13</sup>C from −37.23‰ to −23.96‰; δ<sup>15</sup>N from 3.07‰ to 14.44‰). Changes in zooplankton δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N signatures were quantified using a Bayesian hierarchical model predicting fresh values from ethanol-preserved values. Ethanol preservation increased δ<sup>13</sup>C by a factor of 1.158 (95% CI 0.866–1.441) and had a negligible effect on δ<sup>15</sup>N (slope = 1.077; 95% CI 0.833–1.359). Lake-specific values did not differ from the overall relationship. K-fold and leave-one-out cross validation tests verified that both models were accurate; RMSE of predicted δ<sup>13</sup>C = 0.701 and RMSE of predicted δ<sup>15</sup>N = 0.590. Our correction factors could be applied to other systems in which baseline δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N values fall within the range of our study, and this approach also enables the inclusion of data from additional lakes to estimate new corrections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating ethanol correction factors for δ13C and δ15N isotopic signatures of freshwater zooplankton from multiple lakes\",\"authors\":\"Tristan Blechinger,&nbsp;Denver Link,&nbsp;Jenna K.R. Nelson,&nbsp;Gretchen J.A. Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lom3.10623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In freshwater systems, δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N stable isotopes can be used to differentiate between pelagic and littoral energy sources and to quantify trophic position. In these ecosystems, crustacean zooplankton are frequently used to characterize the pelagic baseline. Zooplankton samples are often preserved prior to processing and analysis, which can affect isotopic signatures. Variability in preservation effects across studies make it difficult to determine if and how to correct for preservation effects. Here, we develop a correction factor for ethanol preservation and present a flexible statistical method that can be updated with additional data to increase its applicability. We collected zooplankton from five lakes in Minnesota, USA encompassing wide isotopic ranges (δ<sup>13</sup>C from −37.23‰ to −23.96‰; δ<sup>15</sup>N from 3.07‰ to 14.44‰). Changes in zooplankton δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N signatures were quantified using a Bayesian hierarchical model predicting fresh values from ethanol-preserved values. Ethanol preservation increased δ<sup>13</sup>C by a factor of 1.158 (95% CI 0.866–1.441) and had a negligible effect on δ<sup>15</sup>N (slope = 1.077; 95% CI 0.833–1.359). Lake-specific values did not differ from the overall relationship. K-fold and leave-one-out cross validation tests verified that both models were accurate; RMSE of predicted δ<sup>13</sup>C = 0.701 and RMSE of predicted δ<sup>15</sup>N = 0.590. Our correction factors could be applied to other systems in which baseline δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N values fall within the range of our study, and this approach also enables the inclusion of data from additional lakes to estimate new corrections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10623\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在淡水系统中,δ13C 和 δ15N稳定同位素可用于区分浮游和沿岸的能量来源,并量化营养位置。在这些生态系统中,甲壳类浮游动物经常被用来描述浮游基线的特征。浮游动物样本在处理和分析前通常要进行保存,这会影响同位素特征。不同研究的保存效果存在差异,因此很难确定是否以及如何校正保存效果。在此,我们开发了一种乙醇保存校正因子,并提出了一种灵活的统计方法,该方法可根据更多数据进行更新,以提高其适用性。我们从美国明尼苏达州的五个湖泊中采集了浮游动物,其同位素范围很广(δ13C 从 -37.23‰ 到 -23.96‰;δ15N 从 3.07‰ 到 14.44‰)。浮游动物δ13C和δ15N特征的变化是利用贝叶斯分层模型从乙醇保存值预测新鲜值进行量化的。乙醇保存使 δ13C 增加了 1.158 倍(95% CI 0.866-1.441),对 δ15N 的影响微乎其微(斜率 = 1.077;95% CI 0.833-1.359)。特定湖泊的数值与总体关系没有差异。K-fold 和 leave-one-out 交叉验证测试验证了这两个模型的准确性;预测 δ13C 的 RMSE = 0.701,预测 δ15N 的 RMSE = 0.590。我们的校正因子可应用于基线 δ13C 和 δ15N 值在我们的研究范围内的其他系统,而且这种方法还可以纳入其他湖泊的数据,以估算新的校正因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimating ethanol correction factors for δ13C and δ15N isotopic signatures of freshwater zooplankton from multiple lakes

Estimating ethanol correction factors for δ13C and δ15N isotopic signatures of freshwater zooplankton from multiple lakes

In freshwater systems, δ13C and δ15N stable isotopes can be used to differentiate between pelagic and littoral energy sources and to quantify trophic position. In these ecosystems, crustacean zooplankton are frequently used to characterize the pelagic baseline. Zooplankton samples are often preserved prior to processing and analysis, which can affect isotopic signatures. Variability in preservation effects across studies make it difficult to determine if and how to correct for preservation effects. Here, we develop a correction factor for ethanol preservation and present a flexible statistical method that can be updated with additional data to increase its applicability. We collected zooplankton from five lakes in Minnesota, USA encompassing wide isotopic ranges (δ13C from −37.23‰ to −23.96‰; δ15N from 3.07‰ to 14.44‰). Changes in zooplankton δ13C and δ15N signatures were quantified using a Bayesian hierarchical model predicting fresh values from ethanol-preserved values. Ethanol preservation increased δ13C by a factor of 1.158 (95% CI 0.866–1.441) and had a negligible effect on δ15N (slope = 1.077; 95% CI 0.833–1.359). Lake-specific values did not differ from the overall relationship. K-fold and leave-one-out cross validation tests verified that both models were accurate; RMSE of predicted δ13C = 0.701 and RMSE of predicted δ15N = 0.590. Our correction factors could be applied to other systems in which baseline δ13C and δ15N values fall within the range of our study, and this approach also enables the inclusion of data from additional lakes to estimate new corrections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信