逐点集中流动性拨备解决方案

Corinne Powers
{"title":"逐点集中流动性拨备解决方案","authors":"Corinne Powers","doi":"arxiv-2405.18728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated market makers with concentrated liquidity capabilities are\nprogrammable at the tick level. The maximization of earned fees, plus\ndepreciated reserves, is a convex optimization problem whose vector solution\ngives the best provision of liquidity at each tick under a given set of\nparameter estimates for swap volume and price volatility. Surprisingly, early\nresults show that concentrating liquidity around the current price is usually\nnot the best strategy.","PeriodicalId":501045,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tick-by-Tick Solution for Concentrated Liquidity Provisioning\",\"authors\":\"Corinne Powers\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.18728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated market makers with concentrated liquidity capabilities are\\nprogrammable at the tick level. The maximization of earned fees, plus\\ndepreciated reserves, is a convex optimization problem whose vector solution\\ngives the best provision of liquidity at each tick under a given set of\\nparameter estimates for swap volume and price volatility. Surprisingly, early\\nresults show that concentrating liquidity around the current price is usually\\nnot the best strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.18728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.18728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有集中流动性能力的自动做市商可在刻度水平上进行编程。最大化赚取的费用加上折旧储备是一个凸优化问题,其向量解给出了在一组给定的掉期交易量和价格波动参数估计下,每个交易点的最佳流动性供应。令人惊讶的是,早期结果表明,将流动性集中在当前价格附近通常不是最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tick-by-Tick Solution for Concentrated Liquidity Provisioning
Automated market makers with concentrated liquidity capabilities are programmable at the tick level. The maximization of earned fees, plus depreciated reserves, is a convex optimization problem whose vector solution gives the best provision of liquidity at each tick under a given set of parameter estimates for swap volume and price volatility. Surprisingly, early results show that concentrating liquidity around the current price is usually not the best strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信