基于交叉性的研究框架和方法,强调公立学校教育中的系统性不平等,包括种族主义、性别歧视和阶级歧视

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
James Joseph Scheurich, Madeline Mason
{"title":"基于交叉性的研究框架和方法,强调公立学校教育中的系统性不平等,包括种族主义、性别歧视和阶级歧视","authors":"James Joseph Scheurich, Madeline Mason","doi":"10.1177/15327086241254815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is broad support among education scholars for the assertion that inequities of race, gender, and class within education are systemic and intersectional, many education researchers continue to publish research, especially in highly influential journals, like those of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), that either ignore systemic intersectional inequities or treat the inequities as mere variables. In contrast, we provide a proposed intersectionality-based research framework and a methodology that emphasizes systemic inequities in public schooling, including racism, sexism/patriarchy, and classism. We discuss this framework, describe our methodology (drawn mainly from Matias), and illustrate how it could be applied to research on three White teachers. For each of these teachers, we discuss some possibly new insights or “suppositions” that were yielded by the application of our framework and methodology. We then call on other researchers to strongly center systemic intersectional inequities in research and in research methodologies.","PeriodicalId":46996,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intersectionality-Based Research Framework and Methodology That Emphasizes Systemic Inequities in Public Schooling, Including Racism, Sexism, and Classism\",\"authors\":\"James Joseph Scheurich, Madeline Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15327086241254815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there is broad support among education scholars for the assertion that inequities of race, gender, and class within education are systemic and intersectional, many education researchers continue to publish research, especially in highly influential journals, like those of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), that either ignore systemic intersectional inequities or treat the inequities as mere variables. In contrast, we provide a proposed intersectionality-based research framework and a methodology that emphasizes systemic inequities in public schooling, including racism, sexism/patriarchy, and classism. We discuss this framework, describe our methodology (drawn mainly from Matias), and illustrate how it could be applied to research on three White teachers. For each of these teachers, we discuss some possibly new insights or “suppositions” that were yielded by the application of our framework and methodology. We then call on other researchers to strongly center systemic intersectional inequities in research and in research methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241254815\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241254815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然教育学者广泛支持种族、性别和阶级在教育中的不平等是系统性和交叉性的这一论断,但许多教育研究人员继续发表研究成果,尤其是在极具影响力的期刊上,如美国教育研究协会(AERA)的期刊,要么忽视系统性的交叉性不平等,要么将这些不平等仅仅视为变量。与此相反,我们提出了一个基于交叉性的研究框架和方法,强调公立学校教育中的系统性不平等,包括种族主义、性别歧视/父权制和阶级歧视。我们将讨论这一框架,介绍我们的研究方法(主要来自马蒂亚斯),并说明如何将其应用于对三位白人教师的研究。对于其中的每一位教师,我们都会讨论在应用我们的框架和方法时可能产生的一些新的见解或 "假设"。然后,我们呼吁其他研究人员在研究和研究方法中大力关注系统性交叉不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Intersectionality-Based Research Framework and Methodology That Emphasizes Systemic Inequities in Public Schooling, Including Racism, Sexism, and Classism
While there is broad support among education scholars for the assertion that inequities of race, gender, and class within education are systemic and intersectional, many education researchers continue to publish research, especially in highly influential journals, like those of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), that either ignore systemic intersectional inequities or treat the inequities as mere variables. In contrast, we provide a proposed intersectionality-based research framework and a methodology that emphasizes systemic inequities in public schooling, including racism, sexism/patriarchy, and classism. We discuss this framework, describe our methodology (drawn mainly from Matias), and illustrate how it could be applied to research on three White teachers. For each of these teachers, we discuss some possibly new insights or “suppositions” that were yielded by the application of our framework and methodology. We then call on other researchers to strongly center systemic intersectional inequities in research and in research methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The mandate for this interdisciplinary, international journal is to move methods talk in cultural studies to the forefront, into the regions of moral, ethical and political discourse. The commitment to imagine a more democratic society has been sa guiding feature of cultural studies from the very beginnnig. Contributors to this journal understand that the discourses of a critical, moral methodology are basic to any effort to re-engage the promise of the social sciences and the humanities for democracy in the 21st Century. We seek works that connect critical emanicipatory theories to new forms of social justice and democratic practice are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信