{"title":"基于交叉性的研究框架和方法,强调公立学校教育中的系统性不平等,包括种族主义、性别歧视和阶级歧视","authors":"James Joseph Scheurich, Madeline Mason","doi":"10.1177/15327086241254815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is broad support among education scholars for the assertion that inequities of race, gender, and class within education are systemic and intersectional, many education researchers continue to publish research, especially in highly influential journals, like those of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), that either ignore systemic intersectional inequities or treat the inequities as mere variables. In contrast, we provide a proposed intersectionality-based research framework and a methodology that emphasizes systemic inequities in public schooling, including racism, sexism/patriarchy, and classism. We discuss this framework, describe our methodology (drawn mainly from Matias), and illustrate how it could be applied to research on three White teachers. For each of these teachers, we discuss some possibly new insights or “suppositions” that were yielded by the application of our framework and methodology. We then call on other researchers to strongly center systemic intersectional inequities in research and in research methodologies.","PeriodicalId":46996,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intersectionality-Based Research Framework and Methodology That Emphasizes Systemic Inequities in Public Schooling, Including Racism, Sexism, and Classism\",\"authors\":\"James Joseph Scheurich, Madeline Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15327086241254815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there is broad support among education scholars for the assertion that inequities of race, gender, and class within education are systemic and intersectional, many education researchers continue to publish research, especially in highly influential journals, like those of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), that either ignore systemic intersectional inequities or treat the inequities as mere variables. In contrast, we provide a proposed intersectionality-based research framework and a methodology that emphasizes systemic inequities in public schooling, including racism, sexism/patriarchy, and classism. We discuss this framework, describe our methodology (drawn mainly from Matias), and illustrate how it could be applied to research on three White teachers. For each of these teachers, we discuss some possibly new insights or “suppositions” that were yielded by the application of our framework and methodology. We then call on other researchers to strongly center systemic intersectional inequities in research and in research methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241254815\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241254815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Intersectionality-Based Research Framework and Methodology That Emphasizes Systemic Inequities in Public Schooling, Including Racism, Sexism, and Classism
While there is broad support among education scholars for the assertion that inequities of race, gender, and class within education are systemic and intersectional, many education researchers continue to publish research, especially in highly influential journals, like those of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), that either ignore systemic intersectional inequities or treat the inequities as mere variables. In contrast, we provide a proposed intersectionality-based research framework and a methodology that emphasizes systemic inequities in public schooling, including racism, sexism/patriarchy, and classism. We discuss this framework, describe our methodology (drawn mainly from Matias), and illustrate how it could be applied to research on three White teachers. For each of these teachers, we discuss some possibly new insights or “suppositions” that were yielded by the application of our framework and methodology. We then call on other researchers to strongly center systemic intersectional inequities in research and in research methodologies.
期刊介绍:
The mandate for this interdisciplinary, international journal is to move methods talk in cultural studies to the forefront, into the regions of moral, ethical and political discourse. The commitment to imagine a more democratic society has been sa guiding feature of cultural studies from the very beginnnig. Contributors to this journal understand that the discourses of a critical, moral methodology are basic to any effort to re-engage the promise of the social sciences and the humanities for democracy in the 21st Century. We seek works that connect critical emanicipatory theories to new forms of social justice and democratic practice are encouraged.