J. Zhang, K. Chen, G. Li, W. Chen, Z. Duan, J. Kang, X. Liu, S. Zhang, H. Gan, S. Zhou, C. Weng, C. Ma, Y. Liu, T. Zhou, J. Wang
{"title":"爆炸波导致听觉和前庭功能障碍风险的预测模型","authors":"J. Zhang, K. Chen, G. Li, W. Chen, Z. Duan, J. Kang, X. Liu, S. Zhang, H. Gan, S. Zhou, C. Weng, C. Ma, Y. Liu, T. Zhou, J. Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01168-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Blast deafness and balance disorders are common consequences of modern warfare and terrorist actions. A predictive evaluation system can assist commanders in quickly gathering information on the incapacitation of combat personnel. However, a critical challenge to this goal was to clarify the dose–response relationship between the blast parameters and the severity of auditory and vestibular dysfunction. This paper describes the algorithms for a prediction model. We performed blast experiments to obtain data on animal auditory/vestibular dysfunction under different overpressures. Peak overpressure and positive phase duration of the blast wave were obtained by pressure measurements. The severity of auditory and vestibular dysfunction was established by the auditory brainstem response test, behavioral rating, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials tests. Test data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression analysis to obtain the overpressure limits for auditory/vestibular function and logistic regression curves for severity separately. The ROC curve analysis showed that the overpressure limit for the auditory function was 32.635 kPa and the vestibular function was 96.275 kPa. Logistic regression fitted curves illustrated the dose–response relationship between the coefficient <i>K</i>, normalized by peak overpressure and positive phase duration, and the risk probability of auditory and vestibular disfunction. The prediction model for the risk of auditory and vestibular disfunction severity (mild/moderate/severe) has been established based on the overpressure limit and dose–response relationship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"34 4","pages":"327 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction model for the risk of auditory and vestibular disfunction caused by a blast wave\",\"authors\":\"J. Zhang, K. Chen, G. Li, W. Chen, Z. Duan, J. Kang, X. Liu, S. Zhang, H. Gan, S. Zhou, C. Weng, C. Ma, Y. Liu, T. Zhou, J. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00193-024-01168-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Blast deafness and balance disorders are common consequences of modern warfare and terrorist actions. A predictive evaluation system can assist commanders in quickly gathering information on the incapacitation of combat personnel. However, a critical challenge to this goal was to clarify the dose–response relationship between the blast parameters and the severity of auditory and vestibular dysfunction. This paper describes the algorithms for a prediction model. We performed blast experiments to obtain data on animal auditory/vestibular dysfunction under different overpressures. Peak overpressure and positive phase duration of the blast wave were obtained by pressure measurements. The severity of auditory and vestibular dysfunction was established by the auditory brainstem response test, behavioral rating, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials tests. Test data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression analysis to obtain the overpressure limits for auditory/vestibular function and logistic regression curves for severity separately. The ROC curve analysis showed that the overpressure limit for the auditory function was 32.635 kPa and the vestibular function was 96.275 kPa. Logistic regression fitted curves illustrated the dose–response relationship between the coefficient <i>K</i>, normalized by peak overpressure and positive phase duration, and the risk probability of auditory and vestibular disfunction. The prediction model for the risk of auditory and vestibular disfunction severity (mild/moderate/severe) has been established based on the overpressure limit and dose–response relationship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shock Waves\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"327 - 338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shock Waves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01168-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01168-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
爆炸性耳聋和平衡失调是现代战争和恐怖行动的常见后果。预测评估系统可以帮助指挥官快速收集有关作战人员丧失能力的信息。然而,实现这一目标的关键挑战在于明确爆炸参数与听觉和前庭功能障碍严重程度之间的剂量-反应关系。本文介绍了预测模型的算法。我们进行了爆炸实验,以获得不同超压下动物听觉/前庭功能障碍的数据。通过压力测量获得了爆炸波的峰值超压和正相位持续时间。听觉和前庭功能障碍的严重程度通过听觉脑干反应测试、行为评级和前庭诱发肌源性电位测试来确定。采用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)和逻辑回归分析法对测试数据进行分析,分别得出听觉/前庭功能的超压限值和严重程度的逻辑回归曲线。ROC 曲线分析表明,听觉功能的超压极限为 32.635 千帕,前庭功能的超压极限为 96.275 千帕。逻辑回归拟合曲线显示了以峰值超压和正相位持续时间归一化的系数 K 与听觉和前庭功能障碍风险概率之间的剂量-反应关系。根据超压极限和剂量-反应关系,建立了听觉和前庭功能障碍严重程度(轻度/中度/重度)风险预测模型。
Prediction model for the risk of auditory and vestibular disfunction caused by a blast wave
Blast deafness and balance disorders are common consequences of modern warfare and terrorist actions. A predictive evaluation system can assist commanders in quickly gathering information on the incapacitation of combat personnel. However, a critical challenge to this goal was to clarify the dose–response relationship between the blast parameters and the severity of auditory and vestibular dysfunction. This paper describes the algorithms for a prediction model. We performed blast experiments to obtain data on animal auditory/vestibular dysfunction under different overpressures. Peak overpressure and positive phase duration of the blast wave were obtained by pressure measurements. The severity of auditory and vestibular dysfunction was established by the auditory brainstem response test, behavioral rating, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials tests. Test data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression analysis to obtain the overpressure limits for auditory/vestibular function and logistic regression curves for severity separately. The ROC curve analysis showed that the overpressure limit for the auditory function was 32.635 kPa and the vestibular function was 96.275 kPa. Logistic regression fitted curves illustrated the dose–response relationship between the coefficient K, normalized by peak overpressure and positive phase duration, and the risk probability of auditory and vestibular disfunction. The prediction model for the risk of auditory and vestibular disfunction severity (mild/moderate/severe) has been established based on the overpressure limit and dose–response relationship.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.