儿童精神病学中的种族隐性关联。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Katie A Malison, Victor J Avila-Quintero, Cheryl S Al-Mateen, José Flores, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Wanjikũ F M Njoroge, Douglas K Novins, Barbara Robles-Ramamurthy, Jerome H Taylor, Michael H Bloch, Amalia Londoño Tobón
{"title":"儿童精神病学中的种族隐性关联。","authors":"Katie A Malison, Victor J Avila-Quintero, Cheryl S Al-Mateen, José Flores, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Wanjikũ F M Njoroge, Douglas K Novins, Barbara Robles-Ramamurthy, Jerome H Taylor, Michael H Bloch, Amalia Londoño Tobón","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Racial disparities in diagnosis and treatment are prevalent in child psychiatry, including disparate diagnosis rates of internalizing and externalizing disorders in Black and White children. However, limited research has investigated mechanisms that contribute to these disparities. This study examined child racial implicit associations in psychiatric clinicians and medical students to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychiatrists and trainees completed an online survey including 2 race Implicit Association Tests (IATs) pairing child faces to words with either positive or negative valence, and words related to internalizing or externalizing behavioral problems. Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic predictors of implicit associations were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed from 235 psychiatrists and trainees (112 child and adolescent psychiatrists and fellows) who met inclusion criteria. Psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated greater moderate-to-strong association between Black child faces and \"bad\" (ie, negatively valenced) words (44.3%) vs \"good\" (ie, positively valenced) words (6.4%), and between externalizing words (41.7%) vs internalizing words (7.2%). Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic characteristics including being female (β = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.01; p < .05), Black (β = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.18; p < .001), or an attending physician (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01) were significant predictors of decreased association between Black child faces and negative valence words. Being female was a significant predictor of decreased association between Black child faces and externalizing words (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participating psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated bias toward associating Black rather than White child faces with negative words and externalizing behavioral problems. Future research should examine the following: racial implicit associations in a more generalizable sample; the relationship between race IATs and provider behavior; and interventions to reduce racial inequities in psychiatry, including individual and systemic solutions.</p><p><strong>Diversity & inclusion statement: </strong>We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Implicit Associations in Child Psychiatry.\",\"authors\":\"Katie A Malison, Victor J Avila-Quintero, Cheryl S Al-Mateen, José Flores, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Wanjikũ F M Njoroge, Douglas K Novins, Barbara Robles-Ramamurthy, Jerome H Taylor, Michael H Bloch, Amalia Londoño Tobón\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Racial disparities in diagnosis and treatment are prevalent in child psychiatry, including disparate diagnosis rates of internalizing and externalizing disorders in Black and White children. However, limited research has investigated mechanisms that contribute to these disparities. This study examined child racial implicit associations in psychiatric clinicians and medical students to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychiatrists and trainees completed an online survey including 2 race Implicit Association Tests (IATs) pairing child faces to words with either positive or negative valence, and words related to internalizing or externalizing behavioral problems. Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic predictors of implicit associations were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed from 235 psychiatrists and trainees (112 child and adolescent psychiatrists and fellows) who met inclusion criteria. Psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated greater moderate-to-strong association between Black child faces and \\\"bad\\\" (ie, negatively valenced) words (44.3%) vs \\\"good\\\" (ie, positively valenced) words (6.4%), and between externalizing words (41.7%) vs internalizing words (7.2%). Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic characteristics including being female (β = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.01; p < .05), Black (β = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.18; p < .001), or an attending physician (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01) were significant predictors of decreased association between Black child faces and negative valence words. Being female was a significant predictor of decreased association between Black child faces and externalizing words (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participating psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated bias toward associating Black rather than White child faces with negative words and externalizing behavioral problems. Future research should examine the following: racial implicit associations in a more generalizable sample; the relationship between race IATs and provider behavior; and interventions to reduce racial inequities in psychiatry, including individual and systemic solutions.</p><p><strong>Diversity & inclusion statement: </strong>We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童精神病学在诊断和治疗方面普遍存在种族差异,包括黑人儿童和白人儿童在内化和外化障碍诊断率方面的差异。然而,有关造成这些差异的机制的研究却十分有限。本研究调查了精神科临床医生和医科学生的儿童种族内隐关联,以弥补这一不足:方法:精神科医生和受训人员完成了一项在线调查,其中包括两个种族内隐联想测验(IAT),将儿童面孔与具有积极或消极情感的词语以及与内化或外化行为问题相关的词语配对。我们还进一步调查了精神病学家和受训者内隐联想的人口学预测因素:我们对符合纳入标准的 235 名精神科医生和受训人员(112 名儿童和青少年精神科医生和研究员)的数据进行了分析。精神科医生和受训人员在黑人儿童面孔与 "坏 "词(44.3%)和 "好 "词(6.4%)之间,以及在外化词(41.7%)和内化词(7.2%)之间表现出更大的中强关联。精神科医生和受训人员的人口统计学特征包括女性(β = -0.12;95% CI = -0.23至-0.01;p结论:参与研究的精神科医生和受训人员表现出偏向于将黑人而非白人儿童的面孔与负面词语和外化行为问题联系起来。未来的研究应考察:1)在更具普遍性的样本中的种族内隐关联;2)种族 IAT 与提供者行为之间的关系;3)减少精神病学中种族不平等的干预措施,包括个人和系统性解决方案:我们在招募参与者时努力确保性别平衡。在招募人类参与者时,我们努力确保种族、民族和/或其他类型的多样性。我们努力确保以包容的方式准备研究问卷。本论文的一位或多位作者自认为是一个或多个历史上在科学领域代表性不足的性和/或性别群体的成员。我们积极努力促进作者群体的性别平衡。在我们的作者群中,我们积极致力于促进科学领域中历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体的融入。本论文的一位或多位作者自认为是一个或多个历史上在科学领域代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体的成员。本文的一位或多位作者获得了旨在提高科学领域少数群体代表性的计划的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial Implicit Associations in Child Psychiatry.

Objective: Racial disparities in diagnosis and treatment are prevalent in child psychiatry, including disparate diagnosis rates of internalizing and externalizing disorders in Black and White children. However, limited research has investigated mechanisms that contribute to these disparities. This study examined child racial implicit associations in psychiatric clinicians and medical students to address this gap.

Method: Psychiatrists and trainees completed an online survey including 2 race Implicit Association Tests (IATs) pairing child faces to words with either positive or negative valence, and words related to internalizing or externalizing behavioral problems. Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic predictors of implicit associations were also investigated.

Results: Data were analyzed from 235 psychiatrists and trainees (112 child and adolescent psychiatrists and fellows) who met inclusion criteria. Psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated greater moderate-to-strong association between Black child faces and "bad" (ie, negatively valenced) words (44.3%) vs "good" (ie, positively valenced) words (6.4%), and between externalizing words (41.7%) vs internalizing words (7.2%). Psychiatrists and trainees' demographic characteristics including being female (β = -0.12; 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.01; p < .05), Black (β = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.18; p < .001), or an attending physician (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01) were significant predictors of decreased association between Black child faces and negative valence words. Being female was a significant predictor of decreased association between Black child faces and externalizing words (β = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.45 to -0.06; p = .01).

Conclusion: Participating psychiatrists and trainees demonstrated bias toward associating Black rather than White child faces with negative words and externalizing behavioral problems. Future research should examine the following: racial implicit associations in a more generalizable sample; the relationship between race IATs and provider behavior; and interventions to reduce racial inequities in psychiatry, including individual and systemic solutions.

Diversity & inclusion statement: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信