生物人类学的伦理未来:涉及已故个人的研究、教学、社区参与和策展。

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Carlina de la Cova, Courtney A. Hofman, Kathryn E. Marklein, Sabrina B. Sholts, Rachel Watkins, Paige Magrogan, Molly Kathleen Zuckerman
{"title":"生物人类学的伦理未来:涉及已故个人的研究、教学、社区参与和策展。","authors":"Carlina de la Cova,&nbsp;Courtney A. Hofman,&nbsp;Kathryn E. Marklein,&nbsp;Sabrina B. Sholts,&nbsp;Rachel Watkins,&nbsp;Paige Magrogan,&nbsp;Molly Kathleen Zuckerman","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.24980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although ethical reforms in biological anthropology have gained ground in recent years, there is still a scarcity of ethical standards for work involving historical documented collections (HDCs) at US museums and universities. These collections of deceased individuals were created in the late 19th to mid-20th centuries under anatomy laws that targeted socially marginalized communities and allowed for the dissection of these individuals without their consent. Due to the extensive information associated with the individuals and made available to researchers, these collections have served as foundational resources for theory and methods development in biological anthropology into the 21st century. Recognizing the need for ethical guidelines for research, teaching and training, community engagement, and curation involving HDCs, we held a workshop called “Ethical Futures for Curation, Research, and Teaching in Biological Anthropology” on November 15–17, 2021. Here we summarize the conversations and major points of consensus among the workshop participants on these topics in order to advance these ethical considerations more broadly across the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.24980","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical futures in biological anthropology: Research, teaching, community engagement, and curation involving deceased individuals\",\"authors\":\"Carlina de la Cova,&nbsp;Courtney A. Hofman,&nbsp;Kathryn E. Marklein,&nbsp;Sabrina B. Sholts,&nbsp;Rachel Watkins,&nbsp;Paige Magrogan,&nbsp;Molly Kathleen Zuckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajpa.24980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although ethical reforms in biological anthropology have gained ground in recent years, there is still a scarcity of ethical standards for work involving historical documented collections (HDCs) at US museums and universities. These collections of deceased individuals were created in the late 19th to mid-20th centuries under anatomy laws that targeted socially marginalized communities and allowed for the dissection of these individuals without their consent. Due to the extensive information associated with the individuals and made available to researchers, these collections have served as foundational resources for theory and methods development in biological anthropology into the 21st century. Recognizing the need for ethical guidelines for research, teaching and training, community engagement, and curation involving HDCs, we held a workshop called “Ethical Futures for Curation, Research, and Teaching in Biological Anthropology” on November 15–17, 2021. Here we summarize the conversations and major points of consensus among the workshop participants on these topics in order to advance these ethical considerations more broadly across the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.24980\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管近年来生物人类学的伦理改革已经取得了一定的进展,但美国博物馆和大学中涉及历史文献收藏(HDCs)的工作仍然缺乏伦理标准。19 世纪末至 20 世纪中叶,根据针对社会边缘群体的解剖学法律,允许在未经其同意的情况下对其进行解剖。由于与这些个体相关的大量信息可供研究人员使用,这些藏品成为生物人类学理论和方法发展的基础资源,并一直延续到 21 世纪。我们认识到需要为涉及人类数据中心的研究、教学和培训、社区参与和收藏制定伦理准则,因此于 2021 年 11 月 15-17 日举办了名为 "生物人类学收藏、研究和教学的伦理未来 "的研讨会。在此,我们总结了研讨会与会者就这些主题进行的对话和达成的主要共识,以便在整个领域更广泛地推进这些伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical futures in biological anthropology: Research, teaching, community engagement, and curation involving deceased individuals

Although ethical reforms in biological anthropology have gained ground in recent years, there is still a scarcity of ethical standards for work involving historical documented collections (HDCs) at US museums and universities. These collections of deceased individuals were created in the late 19th to mid-20th centuries under anatomy laws that targeted socially marginalized communities and allowed for the dissection of these individuals without their consent. Due to the extensive information associated with the individuals and made available to researchers, these collections have served as foundational resources for theory and methods development in biological anthropology into the 21st century. Recognizing the need for ethical guidelines for research, teaching and training, community engagement, and curation involving HDCs, we held a workshop called “Ethical Futures for Curation, Research, and Teaching in Biological Anthropology” on November 15–17, 2021. Here we summarize the conversations and major points of consensus among the workshop participants on these topics in order to advance these ethical considerations more broadly across the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信