成人烧伤中心复苏指南的修订导致复苏要求降低。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Dominick Curry, Kimberly Wray, Brandon Hobbs, Susan Smith, Howard Smith
{"title":"成人烧伤中心复苏指南的修订导致复苏要求降低。","authors":"Dominick Curry, Kimberly Wray, Brandon Hobbs, Susan Smith, Howard Smith","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2018, the institutional burn resuscitation guideline was updated to remove the use of high-dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) therapy, to lower 24-hour resuscitation fluid estimations from 4 to 2 mL/kg/TBSA, and to optimize guidance around appropriate colloid resuscitation. This retrospective study compared the incidence of a composite safety outcome (acute kidney injury, or intra-abdominal hypertension requiring intervention) between the pre-guideline update to post-guideline update. Secondarily, 24-hour resuscitation volumes, hourly urine output, vasopressor use, and mechanical ventilation duration were compared as well. The composite safety outcome was similar between the 2 groups (40% vs 29%; P = .27), but the post-group showed significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes (3.74 vs 2.94 mL/kg/TBSA; P < .01), as well as lower urine output (1.26 vs 0.75 mL/kg/h; P < .01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, or mortality. This study suggests that a simplified resuscitation protocol without HDAA, combined with a lower starting fluid rate, led to significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes without an increase in adverse safety events.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1499-1504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision of an Adult Burn Center's Resuscitation Guideline Leads to Lower Resuscitation Requirements.\",\"authors\":\"Dominick Curry, Kimberly Wray, Brandon Hobbs, Susan Smith, Howard Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2018, the institutional burn resuscitation guideline was updated to remove the use of high-dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) therapy, to lower 24-hour resuscitation fluid estimations from 4 to 2 mL/kg/TBSA, and to optimize guidance around appropriate colloid resuscitation. This retrospective study compared the incidence of a composite safety outcome (acute kidney injury, or intra-abdominal hypertension requiring intervention) between the pre-guideline update to post-guideline update. Secondarily, 24-hour resuscitation volumes, hourly urine output, vasopressor use, and mechanical ventilation duration were compared as well. The composite safety outcome was similar between the 2 groups (40% vs 29%; P = .27), but the post-group showed significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes (3.74 vs 2.94 mL/kg/TBSA; P < .01), as well as lower urine output (1.26 vs 0.75 mL/kg/h; P < .01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, or mortality. This study suggests that a simplified resuscitation protocol without HDAA, combined with a lower starting fluid rate, led to significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes without an increase in adverse safety events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1499-1504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae098\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018 年,机构烧伤复苏指南进行了更新,取消了大剂量抗坏血酸(HDAA)疗法的使用,将 24 小时复苏液体估计值从 4 毫升/千克/TBSA 降低到 2 毫升/千克/TBSA,并优化了有关适当胶体复苏的指导。这项回顾性研究比较了指南更新前与指南更新后的复合安全结果(急性肾损伤或需要干预的腹内高压)发生率。此外,还比较了 24 小时复苏量、每小时尿量、血管加压素使用情况和机械通气持续时间。两组的综合安全性结果相似(40% vs 29%; p=0.27),但指南更新后组的 24 小时复苏量明显降低(3.74 mL/kg/TBSA vs 2.94 mL/kg/TBSA; p=0.27)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision of an Adult Burn Center's Resuscitation Guideline Leads to Lower Resuscitation Requirements.

In 2018, the institutional burn resuscitation guideline was updated to remove the use of high-dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) therapy, to lower 24-hour resuscitation fluid estimations from 4 to 2 mL/kg/TBSA, and to optimize guidance around appropriate colloid resuscitation. This retrospective study compared the incidence of a composite safety outcome (acute kidney injury, or intra-abdominal hypertension requiring intervention) between the pre-guideline update to post-guideline update. Secondarily, 24-hour resuscitation volumes, hourly urine output, vasopressor use, and mechanical ventilation duration were compared as well. The composite safety outcome was similar between the 2 groups (40% vs 29%; P = .27), but the post-group showed significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes (3.74 vs 2.94 mL/kg/TBSA; P < .01), as well as lower urine output (1.26 vs 0.75 mL/kg/h; P < .01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, or mortality. This study suggests that a simplified resuscitation protocol without HDAA, combined with a lower starting fluid rate, led to significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes without an increase in adverse safety events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信