评估 PSMA PET/CT 对前列腺癌初步分期诊断准确性的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Andrea Mari, Anna Cadenar, Sofia Giudici, Gemma Cianchi, Simone Albisinni, Riccardo Autorino, Fabrizio Di Maida, Giorgio Gandaglia, M Carmen Mir, Massimo Valerio, Giancarlo Marra, Fabio Zattoni, Lorenzo Bianchi, Riccardo Lombardo, Shahrokh F Shariat, Morgan Roupret, Matteo Bauckneht, Luca Vaggelli, Cosimo De Nunzio, Andrea Minervini
{"title":"评估 PSMA PET/CT 对前列腺癌初步分期诊断准确性的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Andrea Mari, Anna Cadenar, Sofia Giudici, Gemma Cianchi, Simone Albisinni, Riccardo Autorino, Fabrizio Di Maida, Giorgio Gandaglia, M Carmen Mir, Massimo Valerio, Giancarlo Marra, Fabio Zattoni, Lorenzo Bianchi, Riccardo Lombardo, Shahrokh F Shariat, Morgan Roupret, Matteo Bauckneht, Luca Vaggelli, Cosimo De Nunzio, Andrea Minervini","doi":"10.1038/s41391-024-00850-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA PET/CT) is notable for its superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting recurrent PCa and is under investigation for its potential in pre-treatment staging. Despite its established efficacy in nodal and metastasis staging in trial setting, its role in primary staging awaits fuller validation due to limited evidence on oncologic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT compared to CI for comprehensive PCa staging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Scopus and Web of science databases were searched till March 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Primary outcomes were specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT for local, nodal and metastatic staging in PCa patients. Due to the unavailability of data, a meta-analysis was feasible only for detection of seminal vesicles invasion (SVI) and LNI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 studies, comprising 3876 patients, were included. Of these, 6 investigated accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detection of SVI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 42.29% (95%CI: 29.85-55.78%), 87.59% (95%CI: 77.10%-93.67%), 93.39% (95%CI: 74.95%-98.52%) and 86.60% (95%CI: 58.83%-96.69%), respectively. Heterogeneity analysis revealed significant variability for PPV and NPV. 18 studies investigated PSMA PET/CT accuracy in detection of LNI. Aggregate sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 43.63% (95%CI: 34.19-53.56%), 85.55% (95%CI: 75.95%-91.74%), 67.47% (95%CI: 52.42%-79.6%) and 83.61% (95%CI: 79.19%-87.24%). No significant heterogeneity was found between studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlights PSMA PET-CT effectiveness in detecting SVI and its good accuracy in LNI compared to CI. Nonetheless, it also reveals a lack of high-quality research on its performance in clinical T staging, extraprostatic extension and distant metastasis evaluation, emphasizing the need for further rigorous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in the initial staging of prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Mari, Anna Cadenar, Sofia Giudici, Gemma Cianchi, Simone Albisinni, Riccardo Autorino, Fabrizio Di Maida, Giorgio Gandaglia, M Carmen Mir, Massimo Valerio, Giancarlo Marra, Fabio Zattoni, Lorenzo Bianchi, Riccardo Lombardo, Shahrokh F Shariat, Morgan Roupret, Matteo Bauckneht, Luca Vaggelli, Cosimo De Nunzio, Andrea Minervini\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41391-024-00850-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA PET/CT) is notable for its superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting recurrent PCa and is under investigation for its potential in pre-treatment staging. Despite its established efficacy in nodal and metastasis staging in trial setting, its role in primary staging awaits fuller validation due to limited evidence on oncologic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT compared to CI for comprehensive PCa staging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Scopus and Web of science databases were searched till March 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Primary outcomes were specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT for local, nodal and metastatic staging in PCa patients. Due to the unavailability of data, a meta-analysis was feasible only for detection of seminal vesicles invasion (SVI) and LNI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 studies, comprising 3876 patients, were included. Of these, 6 investigated accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detection of SVI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 42.29% (95%CI: 29.85-55.78%), 87.59% (95%CI: 77.10%-93.67%), 93.39% (95%CI: 74.95%-98.52%) and 86.60% (95%CI: 58.83%-96.69%), respectively. Heterogeneity analysis revealed significant variability for PPV and NPV. 18 studies investigated PSMA PET/CT accuracy in detection of LNI. Aggregate sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 43.63% (95%CI: 34.19-53.56%), 85.55% (95%CI: 75.95%-91.74%), 67.47% (95%CI: 52.42%-79.6%) and 83.61% (95%CI: 79.19%-87.24%). No significant heterogeneity was found between studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlights PSMA PET-CT effectiveness in detecting SVI and its good accuracy in LNI compared to CI. Nonetheless, it also reveals a lack of high-quality research on its performance in clinical T staging, extraprostatic extension and distant metastasis evaluation, emphasizing the need for further rigorous studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00850-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00850-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)的正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen,PSMA PET/CT)在检测复发性 PCa 方面具有极高的灵敏度和特异性,其在治疗前分期方面的潜力正在接受研究。尽管PSMA PET/CT在结节和转移灶分期试验中的疗效已得到证实,但由于有关肿瘤结果的证据有限,其在原发分期中的作用仍有待更充分的验证。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估 PSMA PET/CT 与 CI 相比在 PCa 综合分期中的诊断准确性:方法:检索 Medline、Scopus 和 Web of science 数据库,直至 2023 年 3 月。方法:对 Medline、Scopus 和 Web 科学数据库进行检索,直至 2023 年 3 月,并遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南来确定符合条件的研究。主要结果为 PSMA PET/CT 对 PCa 患者局部、结节和转移分期的特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV)。由于缺乏数据,只能对精囊侵犯(SVI)和LNI的检测进行荟萃分析:结果:共纳入49项研究,包括3876名患者。结果:共纳入49项研究,3876名患者,其中6项研究探讨了PSMA PET/CT检测SVI的准确性。汇总的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 42.29%(95%CI:29.85%-55.78%)、87.59%(95%CI:77.10%-93.67%)、93.39%(95%CI:74.95%-98.52%)和 86.60%(95%CI:58.83%-96.69%)。异质性分析显示 PPV 和 NPV 存在显著差异。18 项研究调查了 PSMA PET/CT 检测 LNI 的准确性。总敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 43.63%(95%CI:34.19-53.56%)、85.55%(95%CI:75.95%-91.74%)、67.47%(95%CI:52.42%-79.6%)和 83.61%(95%CI:79.19%-87.24%)。研究之间未发现明显的异质性:本系统综述和荟萃分析强调了 PSMA PET-CT 在检测 SVI 方面的有效性,而且与 CI 相比,PSMA PET-CT 在 LNI 方面具有良好的准确性。然而,它也揭示了在临床T分期、前列腺外扩展和远处转移评估方面缺乏高质量的研究,强调了进一步严格研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in the initial staging of prostate cancer.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in the initial staging of prostate cancer.

Background: Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA PET/CT) is notable for its superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting recurrent PCa and is under investigation for its potential in pre-treatment staging. Despite its established efficacy in nodal and metastasis staging in trial setting, its role in primary staging awaits fuller validation due to limited evidence on oncologic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT compared to CI for comprehensive PCa staging.

Methods: Medline, Scopus and Web of science databases were searched till March 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Primary outcomes were specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT for local, nodal and metastatic staging in PCa patients. Due to the unavailability of data, a meta-analysis was feasible only for detection of seminal vesicles invasion (SVI) and LNI.

Results: A total of 49 studies, comprising 3876 patients, were included. Of these, 6 investigated accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detection of SVI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 42.29% (95%CI: 29.85-55.78%), 87.59% (95%CI: 77.10%-93.67%), 93.39% (95%CI: 74.95%-98.52%) and 86.60% (95%CI: 58.83%-96.69%), respectively. Heterogeneity analysis revealed significant variability for PPV and NPV. 18 studies investigated PSMA PET/CT accuracy in detection of LNI. Aggregate sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 43.63% (95%CI: 34.19-53.56%), 85.55% (95%CI: 75.95%-91.74%), 67.47% (95%CI: 52.42%-79.6%) and 83.61% (95%CI: 79.19%-87.24%). No significant heterogeneity was found between studies.

Conclusions: The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlights PSMA PET-CT effectiveness in detecting SVI and its good accuracy in LNI compared to CI. Nonetheless, it also reveals a lack of high-quality research on its performance in clinical T staging, extraprostatic extension and distant metastasis evaluation, emphasizing the need for further rigorous studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信