纠结的河岸、辫状的河流和复杂的层次结构:超越微观进化和宏观进化。

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
M Kearney, B S Lieberman, L C Strotz
{"title":"纠结的河岸、辫状的河流和复杂的层次结构:超越微观进化和宏观进化。","authors":"M Kearney, B S Lieberman, L C Strotz","doi":"10.1093/jeb/voae065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ever since the Modern Synthesis, a debate about the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution has persisted - specifically, whether they are equivalent, distinct, or explain one another. How one answers this has become shorthand for a much broader set of theoretical debates in evolutionary biology. Here, we examine microevolution and macroevolution in the context of the vast proliferation of data, knowledge, and theory since the advent of the Modern Synthesis. We suggest that traditional views on microevolution and macroevolution are too binary and reductive. For example, patterns and processes are not confined to micro- and macro- domains; they are interconnected at various temporal and spatial scales and across hierarchical entities. Further, biological entities have variably fuzzy boundaries, and evolutionary processes that influence macroevolution occur at micro- and macro- levels. In addition, these conceptual advances in phylodynamics have yet to be fully integrated with contemporary macroevolutionary approaches. Finally, holding microevolution and macroevolution as distinct domains thwarts synthesis and collaboration on important research questions. We propose that the focal entities and processes considered by evolutionary studies be contextualized within the newfound complexity of the multidimensional, multi-modal, multi-level phylogenetic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":50198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tangled Banks, Braided Rivers and Complex Hierarchies: Beyond Microevolution and Macroevolution.\",\"authors\":\"M Kearney, B S Lieberman, L C Strotz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jeb/voae065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ever since the Modern Synthesis, a debate about the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution has persisted - specifically, whether they are equivalent, distinct, or explain one another. How one answers this has become shorthand for a much broader set of theoretical debates in evolutionary biology. Here, we examine microevolution and macroevolution in the context of the vast proliferation of data, knowledge, and theory since the advent of the Modern Synthesis. We suggest that traditional views on microevolution and macroevolution are too binary and reductive. For example, patterns and processes are not confined to micro- and macro- domains; they are interconnected at various temporal and spatial scales and across hierarchical entities. Further, biological entities have variably fuzzy boundaries, and evolutionary processes that influence macroevolution occur at micro- and macro- levels. In addition, these conceptual advances in phylodynamics have yet to be fully integrated with contemporary macroevolutionary approaches. Finally, holding microevolution and macroevolution as distinct domains thwarts synthesis and collaboration on important research questions. We propose that the focal entities and processes considered by evolutionary studies be contextualized within the newfound complexity of the multidimensional, multi-modal, multi-level phylogenetic system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从现代综合理论提出以来,关于微观进化和宏观进化之间关系的争论就一直没有停止过--具体来说,它们之间是等同的、不同的,还是可以相互解释的。如何回答这个问题已成为进化生物学中一系列更广泛的理论争论的简称。在此,我们将结合现代综合理论问世以来大量涌现的数据、知识和理论,对微观进化和宏观进化进行研究。我们认为,关于微观进化和宏观进化的传统观点过于二元对立和还原。例如,模式和过程并不局限于微观和宏观领域;它们在不同的时空尺度和不同的层次实体之间相互关联。此外,生物实体的边界模糊多样,影响宏观进化的进化过程发生在微观和宏观层面。此外,系统动力学在概念上取得的这些进展尚未与当代的宏观进化方法充分结合。最后,将微观进化和宏观进化视为不同的领域阻碍了重要研究问题的综合与合作。我们建议将进化研究中考虑的重点实体和过程纳入新发现的多维、多模式、多层次系统进化系统的复杂性之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tangled Banks, Braided Rivers and Complex Hierarchies: Beyond Microevolution and Macroevolution.

Ever since the Modern Synthesis, a debate about the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution has persisted - specifically, whether they are equivalent, distinct, or explain one another. How one answers this has become shorthand for a much broader set of theoretical debates in evolutionary biology. Here, we examine microevolution and macroevolution in the context of the vast proliferation of data, knowledge, and theory since the advent of the Modern Synthesis. We suggest that traditional views on microevolution and macroevolution are too binary and reductive. For example, patterns and processes are not confined to micro- and macro- domains; they are interconnected at various temporal and spatial scales and across hierarchical entities. Further, biological entities have variably fuzzy boundaries, and evolutionary processes that influence macroevolution occur at micro- and macro- levels. In addition, these conceptual advances in phylodynamics have yet to be fully integrated with contemporary macroevolutionary approaches. Finally, holding microevolution and macroevolution as distinct domains thwarts synthesis and collaboration on important research questions. We propose that the focal entities and processes considered by evolutionary studies be contextualized within the newfound complexity of the multidimensional, multi-modal, multi-level phylogenetic system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It covers both micro- and macro-evolution of all types of organisms. The aim of the Journal is to integrate perspectives across molecular and microbial evolution, behaviour, genetics, ecology, life histories, development, palaeontology, systematics and morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信