确定急性中风老年患者下肢运动指数和躯干控制测试的最小临床重要差异和临界值:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Masafumi Nozoe, Kazuhiro Miyata, Hiroki Kubo, Mitsuru Ishida, Kenta Yamamoto
{"title":"确定急性中风老年患者下肢运动指数和躯干控制测试的最小临床重要差异和临界值:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Masafumi Nozoe, Kazuhiro Miyata, Hiroki Kubo, Mitsuru Ishida, Kenta Yamamoto","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2359340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) for lower limb strength measured by the Motricity Index (LLMI) and trunk function assessed by the Trunk Control Test (TCT) in the acute phase of stroke in older patients. Further, the study sought to determine the cutoff values predicting functional prognosis at discharge for both the LLMI and TCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted for older patients (≥65 years) admitted for acute stroke, receiving guideline-based stroke care that includes early rehabilitation. The LLMI and TCT were measured within 7 days of admission and at discharge. The MCID was derived from receiving operating characteristic curves, based on a ≥ 1 point shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) from admission to discharge. A good functional prognosis at discharge was defined as an mRS score of ≤ 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 older patients with acute stroke were included. The TCT achieved an MCID of 13 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.704, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.633-0.775), whereas the LLMI lacked the precision to produce a significant MCID. The optimal cutoff points for predicting a good outcome were found to be an LLMI score of 65 (AUC = 0.770, 95% CI: 0.705-0.835) and a TCT score of 25 (AUC = 0.827, 95% CI: 0.768-0.887) upon admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a valid MCID for the TCT, failed to do so for the LLMI, and established cutoff values for both the LLMI and TCT that can predict good outcomes in older patients with acute stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing minimal clinically important differences and cut-off values for the lower limb motricity index and trunk control test in older patients with acute stroke: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Masafumi Nozoe, Kazuhiro Miyata, Hiroki Kubo, Mitsuru Ishida, Kenta Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2359340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) for lower limb strength measured by the Motricity Index (LLMI) and trunk function assessed by the Trunk Control Test (TCT) in the acute phase of stroke in older patients. Further, the study sought to determine the cutoff values predicting functional prognosis at discharge for both the LLMI and TCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted for older patients (≥65 years) admitted for acute stroke, receiving guideline-based stroke care that includes early rehabilitation. The LLMI and TCT were measured within 7 days of admission and at discharge. The MCID was derived from receiving operating characteristic curves, based on a ≥ 1 point shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) from admission to discharge. A good functional prognosis at discharge was defined as an mRS score of ≤ 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 older patients with acute stroke were included. The TCT achieved an MCID of 13 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.704, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.633-0.775), whereas the LLMI lacked the precision to produce a significant MCID. The optimal cutoff points for predicting a good outcome were found to be an LLMI score of 65 (AUC = 0.770, 95% CI: 0.705-0.835) and a TCT score of 25 (AUC = 0.827, 95% CI: 0.768-0.887) upon admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a valid MCID for the TCT, failed to do so for the LLMI, and established cutoff values for both the LLMI and TCT that can predict good outcomes in older patients with acute stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2359340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2359340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定老年患者卒中急性期运动指数(LLMI)测量下肢力量和躯干控制测试(TCT)评估躯干功能的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。此外,该研究还试图确定 LLMI 和 TCT 预测出院时功能预后的临界值:这项前瞻性队列研究的对象是因急性脑卒中入院的老年患者(≥65 岁),他们接受了包括早期康复在内的基于指南的脑卒中治疗。入院 7 天内和出院时测量了 LLMI 和 TCT。MCID是根据入院到出院期间改良Rankin量表(mRS)移动≥1个点,通过接受操作特征曲线得出的。出院时功能预后良好的定义是 mRS 评分≤ 3:结果:共纳入 201 名老年急性中风患者。TCT 的 MCID 为 13(曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.704,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.633-0.775):0.633-0.775),而 LLMI 的精确度不足以产生显著的 MCID。入院时 LLMI 得分为 65 分(AUC = 0.770,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.705-0.835),TCT 得分为 25 分(AUC = 0.827,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.768-0.887),是预测良好预后的最佳临界点:本研究为 TCT 确定了有效的 MCID,但未能为 LLMI 确定有效的 MCID,并为 LLMI 和 TCT 确定了可预测老年急性卒中患者良好预后的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing minimal clinically important differences and cut-off values for the lower limb motricity index and trunk control test in older patients with acute stroke: a prospective cohort study.

Objective: To establish the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) for lower limb strength measured by the Motricity Index (LLMI) and trunk function assessed by the Trunk Control Test (TCT) in the acute phase of stroke in older patients. Further, the study sought to determine the cutoff values predicting functional prognosis at discharge for both the LLMI and TCT.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted for older patients (≥65 years) admitted for acute stroke, receiving guideline-based stroke care that includes early rehabilitation. The LLMI and TCT were measured within 7 days of admission and at discharge. The MCID was derived from receiving operating characteristic curves, based on a ≥ 1 point shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) from admission to discharge. A good functional prognosis at discharge was defined as an mRS score of ≤ 3.

Results: A total of 201 older patients with acute stroke were included. The TCT achieved an MCID of 13 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.704, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.633-0.775), whereas the LLMI lacked the precision to produce a significant MCID. The optimal cutoff points for predicting a good outcome were found to be an LLMI score of 65 (AUC = 0.770, 95% CI: 0.705-0.835) and a TCT score of 25 (AUC = 0.827, 95% CI: 0.768-0.887) upon admission.

Conclusions: This study identified a valid MCID for the TCT, failed to do so for the LLMI, and established cutoff values for both the LLMI and TCT that can predict good outcomes in older patients with acute stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信