Diann E. Gaalema , Joseph Allencherril , Sherrie Khadanga , Elias Klemperer
{"title":"吸烟对女性心血管疾病的不同影响:叙述性综述和行动呼吁。","authors":"Diann E. Gaalema , Joseph Allencherril , Sherrie Khadanga , Elias Klemperer","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cigarette smoking continues to be a major driver in the incidence and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). As females become an increasingly larger fraction of those who smoke it is imperative that the sex-specific effects of smoking be further explored and acted upon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This narrative review describes current evidence on the differential effects of smoking on CVD in females and the need to improve treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Evidence to date suggests that smoking has disproportionately negative effects on the cardiovascular (CV) system in females, especially in those who are younger. Usually, the onset of CVD is later in females than males, but smoking decreases or eliminates this gap. Females are also more likely to develop types of CVD closely tied to smoking, such as ST-elevated myocardial infarctions<span>, with even higher rates among those who are younger. Possible mechanisms for these worse outcomes in females include a complex interplay between nicotine, other products of combusted cigarettes, and hormones. Sex differences also exist in treatment for smoking. In females, </span></span>Varenicline<span> appears more effective than either Bupropion<span> or nicotine replacement therapy while in males, all three therapies show similar efficacy. Disparities in smoking are also apparent in secondary prevention settings. Females and males are entering secondary prevention with equal rates of smoking, with potentially higher levels of exposure to the byproducts of smoking in females.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These disproportionately negative outcomes for females who smoke require additional research and these persisting rates of smoking suggest a need for female-specific approaches for treating smoking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 108013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential effects of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular disease in females: A narrative review and call to action\",\"authors\":\"Diann E. Gaalema , Joseph Allencherril , Sherrie Khadanga , Elias Klemperer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cigarette smoking continues to be a major driver in the incidence and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). As females become an increasingly larger fraction of those who smoke it is imperative that the sex-specific effects of smoking be further explored and acted upon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This narrative review describes current evidence on the differential effects of smoking on CVD in females and the need to improve treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Evidence to date suggests that smoking has disproportionately negative effects on the cardiovascular (CV) system in females, especially in those who are younger. Usually, the onset of CVD is later in females than males, but smoking decreases or eliminates this gap. Females are also more likely to develop types of CVD closely tied to smoking, such as ST-elevated myocardial infarctions<span>, with even higher rates among those who are younger. Possible mechanisms for these worse outcomes in females include a complex interplay between nicotine, other products of combusted cigarettes, and hormones. Sex differences also exist in treatment for smoking. In females, </span></span>Varenicline<span> appears more effective than either Bupropion<span> or nicotine replacement therapy while in males, all three therapies show similar efficacy. Disparities in smoking are also apparent in secondary prevention settings. Females and males are entering secondary prevention with equal rates of smoking, with potentially higher levels of exposure to the byproducts of smoking in females.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These disproportionately negative outcomes for females who smoke require additional research and these persisting rates of smoking suggest a need for female-specific approaches for treating smoking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524001683\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524001683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential effects of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular disease in females: A narrative review and call to action
Objective
Cigarette smoking continues to be a major driver in the incidence and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). As females become an increasingly larger fraction of those who smoke it is imperative that the sex-specific effects of smoking be further explored and acted upon.
Methods
This narrative review describes current evidence on the differential effects of smoking on CVD in females and the need to improve treatment.
Results
Evidence to date suggests that smoking has disproportionately negative effects on the cardiovascular (CV) system in females, especially in those who are younger. Usually, the onset of CVD is later in females than males, but smoking decreases or eliminates this gap. Females are also more likely to develop types of CVD closely tied to smoking, such as ST-elevated myocardial infarctions, with even higher rates among those who are younger. Possible mechanisms for these worse outcomes in females include a complex interplay between nicotine, other products of combusted cigarettes, and hormones. Sex differences also exist in treatment for smoking. In females, Varenicline appears more effective than either Bupropion or nicotine replacement therapy while in males, all three therapies show similar efficacy. Disparities in smoking are also apparent in secondary prevention settings. Females and males are entering secondary prevention with equal rates of smoking, with potentially higher levels of exposure to the byproducts of smoking in females.
Conclusions
These disproportionately negative outcomes for females who smoke require additional research and these persisting rates of smoking suggest a need for female-specific approaches for treating smoking.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.