创伤后应激障碍风险因素的性别差异:前瞻性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1037/abn0000918
Stephanie Haering, Caroline Meyer, Lars Schulze, Elisabeth Conrad, Meike K Blecker, Rayan El-Haj-Mohamad, Angelika Geiling, Hannah Klusmann, Sarah Schumacher, Christine Knaevelsrud, Sinha Engel
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍风险因素的性别差异:前瞻性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Stephanie Haering, Caroline Meyer, Lars Schulze, Elisabeth Conrad, Meike K Blecker, Rayan El-Haj-Mohamad, Angelika Geiling, Hannah Klusmann, Sarah Schumacher, Christine Knaevelsrud, Sinha Engel","doi":"10.1037/abn0000918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women are at higher risk than men for developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Comprehensive knowledge about these mechanisms is necessary to develop tailored, sex- and gender-sensitive preventive interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined sex-/gender-dependent risk factors, that is, risk factors with sex/gender differences in (a) vulnerability or (b) prevalence/severity, as well as sex-/gender-specific risk factors, that is, and (c) risk factors present in one sex/gender only. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and PSYNDEX for articles published until October 16, 2022. We included prospective studies that assessed risk factors to predict subsequent PTSD symptom severity, as measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale. The primary outcomes were sex/gender stratified pooled for sex-/gender-dependent vulnerability and sex-/gender-specific risk factors and pooled odds ratio (<i>OR</i>) or standardized mean difference (<i>SMD</i>) for sex-/gender-dependent risk factor prevalence/severity. We screened 17,270 records and included 117 reports from 45 studies (<i>N</i> = 13,752) in the systematic review. Seventeen studies (<i>N</i> = 4,257; 1,827 women, 2,430 men) were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding risk factor vulnerability, analyses revealed no significant sex/gender differences except for acute stress symptoms, with stronger associations for men (<i>b</i> = 0.11, <i>SE</i> = 0.06, <i>p</i> < .05). Regarding risk factor prevalence/severity, women reported more severe immediate psychological stress responses (range <i>SMD</i> = 0.23-0.56) and more commonly had a history of mental illness (<i>OR</i> = 1.81, 1.27-2.58). Men showed higher trauma load (<i>SMD</i> = -0.15, -0.29 to 0.01). Few women-specific and no men-specific factors were identified. Results suggest that women's heightened immediate psychological stress response drives sex/gender disparities in PTSD symptom severity. Preventive interventions should thus target women early after trauma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex and gender differences in risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Haering, Caroline Meyer, Lars Schulze, Elisabeth Conrad, Meike K Blecker, Rayan El-Haj-Mohamad, Angelika Geiling, Hannah Klusmann, Sarah Schumacher, Christine Knaevelsrud, Sinha Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0000918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Women are at higher risk than men for developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Comprehensive knowledge about these mechanisms is necessary to develop tailored, sex- and gender-sensitive preventive interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined sex-/gender-dependent risk factors, that is, risk factors with sex/gender differences in (a) vulnerability or (b) prevalence/severity, as well as sex-/gender-specific risk factors, that is, and (c) risk factors present in one sex/gender only. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and PSYNDEX for articles published until October 16, 2022. We included prospective studies that assessed risk factors to predict subsequent PTSD symptom severity, as measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale. The primary outcomes were sex/gender stratified pooled for sex-/gender-dependent vulnerability and sex-/gender-specific risk factors and pooled odds ratio (<i>OR</i>) or standardized mean difference (<i>SMD</i>) for sex-/gender-dependent risk factor prevalence/severity. We screened 17,270 records and included 117 reports from 45 studies (<i>N</i> = 13,752) in the systematic review. Seventeen studies (<i>N</i> = 4,257; 1,827 women, 2,430 men) were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding risk factor vulnerability, analyses revealed no significant sex/gender differences except for acute stress symptoms, with stronger associations for men (<i>b</i> = 0.11, <i>SE</i> = 0.06, <i>p</i> < .05). Regarding risk factor prevalence/severity, women reported more severe immediate psychological stress responses (range <i>SMD</i> = 0.23-0.56) and more commonly had a history of mental illness (<i>OR</i> = 1.81, 1.27-2.58). Men showed higher trauma load (<i>SMD</i> = -0.15, -0.29 to 0.01). Few women-specific and no men-specific factors were identified. Results suggest that women's heightened immediate psychological stress response drives sex/gender disparities in PTSD symptom severity. Preventive interventions should thus target women early after trauma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与男性相比,女性患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险更高,但其潜在机制仍不清楚。有必要全面了解这些机制,以制定有针对性的、对性别敏感的预防干预措施。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了性别依赖性风险因素,即在(a)易感性或(b)发生率/严重性方面存在性别差异的风险因素,以及性别特异性风险因素,即(c)仅存在于一种性别的风险因素。我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO、PsycArticles 和 PSYNDEX 中截至 2022 年 10 月 16 日发表的文章。我们纳入的前瞻性研究评估了预测创伤后应激障碍后续症状严重程度的风险因素,并采用临床医师管理的创伤后应激障碍量表进行测量。主要研究结果为性别/性别分层的性别/性别特异性易感性和性别/性别特异性风险因素的汇总,以及性别/性别特异性风险因素流行率/严重性的汇总几率比(OR)或标准化平均差(SMD)。我们筛选了 17,270 条记录,并将 45 项研究的 117 份报告(N=13,752)纳入系统综述。17项研究(N = 4,257; 1,827 名女性,2,430 名男性)被纳入荟萃分析。关于风险因素的易感性,分析表明,除了急性应激症状与男性的关联性更强(b = 0.11,SE = 0.06,p < .05)外,其他风险因素没有明显的性别差异。关于风险因素的普遍性/严重性,女性报告的即时心理应激反应更严重(SMD = 0.23-0.56 范围),并且更常见的是有精神病史(OR = 1.81,1.27-2.58)。男性的创伤负荷较高(SMD = -0.15,-0.29 至 0.01)。几乎没有发现女性特异性因素,也没有发现男性特异性因素。研究结果表明,女性即时心理应激反应的增强导致了创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度的性别差异。因此,应在创伤后早期针对女性采取预防干预措施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex and gender differences in risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Women are at higher risk than men for developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Comprehensive knowledge about these mechanisms is necessary to develop tailored, sex- and gender-sensitive preventive interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined sex-/gender-dependent risk factors, that is, risk factors with sex/gender differences in (a) vulnerability or (b) prevalence/severity, as well as sex-/gender-specific risk factors, that is, and (c) risk factors present in one sex/gender only. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and PSYNDEX for articles published until October 16, 2022. We included prospective studies that assessed risk factors to predict subsequent PTSD symptom severity, as measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale. The primary outcomes were sex/gender stratified pooled for sex-/gender-dependent vulnerability and sex-/gender-specific risk factors and pooled odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for sex-/gender-dependent risk factor prevalence/severity. We screened 17,270 records and included 117 reports from 45 studies (N = 13,752) in the systematic review. Seventeen studies (N = 4,257; 1,827 women, 2,430 men) were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding risk factor vulnerability, analyses revealed no significant sex/gender differences except for acute stress symptoms, with stronger associations for men (b = 0.11, SE = 0.06, p < .05). Regarding risk factor prevalence/severity, women reported more severe immediate psychological stress responses (range SMD = 0.23-0.56) and more commonly had a history of mental illness (OR = 1.81, 1.27-2.58). Men showed higher trauma load (SMD = -0.15, -0.29 to 0.01). Few women-specific and no men-specific factors were identified. Results suggest that women's heightened immediate psychological stress response drives sex/gender disparities in PTSD symptom severity. Preventive interventions should thus target women early after trauma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信