用于控制近视的市售软性多焦点隐形眼镜的屈光力曲线。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1111/opo.13345
Rebecca M Dang, Klaus Ehrmann, Isabelle Jalbert, Alex Hui, Pauline Kang
{"title":"用于控制近视的市售软性多焦点隐形眼镜的屈光力曲线。","authors":"Rebecca M Dang, Klaus Ehrmann, Isabelle Jalbert, Alex Hui, Pauline Kang","doi":"10.1111/opo.13345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lens power profiles can provide valuable insights on the imposed optical defocus and visual experience of contact lens wearers, especially in the context of myopia control. This study measured the refractive power profiles of multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) currently used or that have the potential for use in myopia control using high spatial resolution aberrometry. The instrument's repeatability for determining MFCLs power profiles was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The power profiles of 10 MFCLs of various designs (centre-distance, centre-near and extended depth of focus) were measured using the Lambda-X NIMO<sup>EVO</sup>, a phase shifting Schlieren-based device. Power profiles were graphically expressed as measured power at each chord position and the maximum add power was calculated. The repeatability of the NIMO<sup>EVO</sup> was expressed as the within-subject standard deviation at each chord position for a subset of five MFCLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured distance powers differed from nominal powers for more than half of the MFCLs with a definable distance zone. There were variations in the chord position of the distance and near correction zones, rate of power transitions and calculated maximum add between the MFCLs which did not depend on lens design. For half of the MFCLs, the power profile shape was inconsistent between different nominal back vertex powers of the same design. The repeatability of the NIMO<sup>EVO</sup> was dependent on the lens design, with designs featuring faster rates of power change exhibiting worse repeatability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in MFCL power profiles were found which were not adequately represented in labelling. This is likely due to the small number of parameters used to define lens power characteristics. Eye health care practitioners should be aware of potential differences in power profiles between different MFCLs, which will impact the retinal defocus introduced during lens wear and the wearer's visual experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca M Dang, Klaus Ehrmann, Isabelle Jalbert, Alex Hui, Pauline Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lens power profiles can provide valuable insights on the imposed optical defocus and visual experience of contact lens wearers, especially in the context of myopia control. This study measured the refractive power profiles of multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) currently used or that have the potential for use in myopia control using high spatial resolution aberrometry. The instrument's repeatability for determining MFCLs power profiles was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The power profiles of 10 MFCLs of various designs (centre-distance, centre-near and extended depth of focus) were measured using the Lambda-X NIMO<sup>EVO</sup>, a phase shifting Schlieren-based device. Power profiles were graphically expressed as measured power at each chord position and the maximum add power was calculated. The repeatability of the NIMO<sup>EVO</sup> was expressed as the within-subject standard deviation at each chord position for a subset of five MFCLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured distance powers differed from nominal powers for more than half of the MFCLs with a definable distance zone. There were variations in the chord position of the distance and near correction zones, rate of power transitions and calculated maximum add between the MFCLs which did not depend on lens design. For half of the MFCLs, the power profile shape was inconsistent between different nominal back vertex powers of the same design. The repeatability of the NIMO<sup>EVO</sup> was dependent on the lens design, with designs featuring faster rates of power change exhibiting worse repeatability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in MFCL power profiles were found which were not adequately represented in labelling. This is likely due to the small number of parameters used to define lens power characteristics. Eye health care practitioners should be aware of potential differences in power profiles between different MFCLs, which will impact the retinal defocus introduced during lens wear and the wearer's visual experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:镜片功率曲线可为隐形眼镜配戴者的强加光学散焦和视觉体验提供有价值的见解,尤其是在近视控制方面。本研究使用高空间分辨率像差仪测量了目前使用的或有可能用于近视控制的多焦点软性隐形眼镜(MFCL)的屈光功率曲线。同时还评估了该仪器在确定 MFCLs 功率曲线时的可重复性:方法:使用 Lambda-X NIMOEVO(一种基于相移 Schlieren 的设备)测量了 10 个不同设计(中心距、中心近和扩展焦深)的 MFCL 的功率曲线。功率曲线用图形表示为每个弦位置的测量功率,并计算出最大附加功率。NIMOEVO 的可重复性以五个 MFCL 子集每个弦位置的受试者内标准偏差表示:结果:在一半以上有明确距离区的 MFCL 中,测得的距离功率与标称功率不同。MFCL之间的远近校正区弦位置、功率转换率和计算出的最大附加值都存在差异,这与镜片设计无关。对于一半的 MFCL,同一设计的不同标称后顶点功率之间的功率曲线形状不一致。NIMOEVO 的重复性取决于透镜的设计,功率变化率较快的设计重复性较差:结论:发现 MFCL 功率曲线存在显著差异,但这些差异在标签中没有得到充分体现。这可能是由于用于定义镜片功率特性的参数较少。眼科保健从业人员应注意不同 MFCL 功率曲线之间的潜在差异,这将影响镜片佩戴过程中引入的视网膜散焦和佩戴者的视觉体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control.

Purpose: Lens power profiles can provide valuable insights on the imposed optical defocus and visual experience of contact lens wearers, especially in the context of myopia control. This study measured the refractive power profiles of multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) currently used or that have the potential for use in myopia control using high spatial resolution aberrometry. The instrument's repeatability for determining MFCLs power profiles was also assessed.

Method: The power profiles of 10 MFCLs of various designs (centre-distance, centre-near and extended depth of focus) were measured using the Lambda-X NIMOEVO, a phase shifting Schlieren-based device. Power profiles were graphically expressed as measured power at each chord position and the maximum add power was calculated. The repeatability of the NIMOEVO was expressed as the within-subject standard deviation at each chord position for a subset of five MFCLs.

Results: The measured distance powers differed from nominal powers for more than half of the MFCLs with a definable distance zone. There were variations in the chord position of the distance and near correction zones, rate of power transitions and calculated maximum add between the MFCLs which did not depend on lens design. For half of the MFCLs, the power profile shape was inconsistent between different nominal back vertex powers of the same design. The repeatability of the NIMOEVO was dependent on the lens design, with designs featuring faster rates of power change exhibiting worse repeatability.

Conclusions: Significant differences in MFCL power profiles were found which were not adequately represented in labelling. This is likely due to the small number of parameters used to define lens power characteristics. Eye health care practitioners should be aware of potential differences in power profiles between different MFCLs, which will impact the retinal defocus introduced during lens wear and the wearer's visual experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信