早期子宫内膜癌和非典型增生患者前哨节点活检的临床和手术评估

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2293-5700
Patrik Pöschke, Paul Gass, Annika Krückel, Katharina Keller, Ramona Erber, Arndt Hartmann, Matthias W Beckmann, Julius Emons
{"title":"早期子宫内膜癌和非典型增生患者前哨节点活检的临床和手术评估","authors":"Patrik Pöschke, Paul Gass, Annika Krückel, Katharina Keller, Ramona Erber, Arndt Hartmann, Matthias W Beckmann, Julius Emons","doi":"10.1055/a-2293-5700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The medical and surgical treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is evolving toward a more patient-centered and personalized approach. The role of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for early-stage EC is unclear, and very few data are available for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The present study investigated the effectiveness of SNB combined with laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with early-stage EC and AEH.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study for the period from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 102 patients with atypical hyperplasia (n = 20) and early-stage EC (n = 82) findings on diagnostic curettage underwent pelvic sentinel node biopsy during the final operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients (55%) who had initially been diagnosed with AEH were found to have EC in the final pathology report. No lymph node metastases were detected in patients who had initially been diagnosed with AEH; a 3.6% rate of positive SNBs was found in patients with EC. Changes in tumor grade occurred in 31.3% of the patients and changes in FIGO stage in 33%. Bilateral sentinel node (SN) mapping was successful in 94.1% of the patients. The postoperative outcomes were comparable to those of routine clinical practice without SNB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNB can be safely offered to patients who have precursor lesions and early-stage EC without notably extending surgical times or increasing postoperative morbidity. This approach can be considered and is safe for patients diagnosed with AEH, but it appears to have a rather small impact on these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"84 5","pages":"470-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Surgical Evaluation of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Patrik Pöschke, Paul Gass, Annika Krückel, Katharina Keller, Ramona Erber, Arndt Hartmann, Matthias W Beckmann, Julius Emons\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2293-5700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The medical and surgical treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is evolving toward a more patient-centered and personalized approach. The role of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for early-stage EC is unclear, and very few data are available for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The present study investigated the effectiveness of SNB combined with laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with early-stage EC and AEH.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study for the period from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 102 patients with atypical hyperplasia (n = 20) and early-stage EC (n = 82) findings on diagnostic curettage underwent pelvic sentinel node biopsy during the final operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients (55%) who had initially been diagnosed with AEH were found to have EC in the final pathology report. No lymph node metastases were detected in patients who had initially been diagnosed with AEH; a 3.6% rate of positive SNBs was found in patients with EC. Changes in tumor grade occurred in 31.3% of the patients and changes in FIGO stage in 33%. Bilateral sentinel node (SN) mapping was successful in 94.1% of the patients. The postoperative outcomes were comparable to those of routine clinical practice without SNB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNB can be safely offered to patients who have precursor lesions and early-stage EC without notably extending surgical times or increasing postoperative morbidity. This approach can be considered and is safe for patients diagnosed with AEH, but it appears to have a rather small impact on these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\"84 5\",\"pages\":\"470-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2293-5700\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2293-5700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:子宫内膜癌(EC)的药物和手术治疗正朝着更加以患者为中心和个性化的方向发展。腹腔镜前哨节点活检(SNB)对于早期子宫内膜癌的作用尚不明确,而对于非典型子宫内膜增生症(AEH)的数据也很少。本研究调查了SNB联合腹腔镜子宫切除术对早期EC和AEH患者的有效性:这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究时间为2018年1月至2023年12月。共有102名诊断性刮宫发现不典型增生(n = 20)和早期EC(n = 82)的患者在最终手术中接受了盆腔前哨节点活检:最初被诊断为AEH的11名患者(55%)在最终病理报告中被发现患有EC。最初诊断为AEH的患者未发现淋巴结转移;EC患者的SNB阳性率为3.6%。31.3%的患者肿瘤分级发生变化,33%的患者FIGO分期发生变化。94.1%的患者成功进行了双侧前哨节点(SN)绘图。术后结果与未进行SNB的常规临床实践结果相当:结论:SNB可安全地用于前驱病变和早期EC患者,不会明显延长手术时间或增加术后发病率。对于确诊为AEH的患者来说,这种方法是可以考虑的,也是安全的,但似乎对这些患者的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and Surgical Evaluation of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Hyperplasia.

Introduction: The medical and surgical treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is evolving toward a more patient-centered and personalized approach. The role of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for early-stage EC is unclear, and very few data are available for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The present study investigated the effectiveness of SNB combined with laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with early-stage EC and AEH.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study for the period from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 102 patients with atypical hyperplasia (n = 20) and early-stage EC (n = 82) findings on diagnostic curettage underwent pelvic sentinel node biopsy during the final operation.

Results: Eleven patients (55%) who had initially been diagnosed with AEH were found to have EC in the final pathology report. No lymph node metastases were detected in patients who had initially been diagnosed with AEH; a 3.6% rate of positive SNBs was found in patients with EC. Changes in tumor grade occurred in 31.3% of the patients and changes in FIGO stage in 33%. Bilateral sentinel node (SN) mapping was successful in 94.1% of the patients. The postoperative outcomes were comparable to those of routine clinical practice without SNB.

Conclusions: SNB can be safely offered to patients who have precursor lesions and early-stage EC without notably extending surgical times or increasing postoperative morbidity. This approach can be considered and is safe for patients diagnosed with AEH, but it appears to have a rather small impact on these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
828
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast obstetrics and perinatal medicine, reproductive medicine, and urogynecology. GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles. In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information. Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信