先进材料早期评估(AMEA)

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wendel Wohlleben, Michael Persson, Blanca Suarez-Merino, Anders Baun, Veronica Di Battista, Susan Dekkers, Eugene P. van Someren, Dirk Broßell, Burkhard Stahlmecke, Martin Wiemann, Otmar Schmid and Andrea Haase
{"title":"先进材料早期评估(AMEA)","authors":"Wendel Wohlleben, Michael Persson, Blanca Suarez-Merino, Anders Baun, Veronica Di Battista, Susan Dekkers, Eugene P. van Someren, Dirk Broßell, Burkhard Stahlmecke, Martin Wiemann, Otmar Schmid and Andrea Haase","doi":"10.1039/D3EN00831B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Advanced materials are rapidly being developed in different material categories. They share little commonalities apart from their novelty, which raises concerns that these materials may fall into a regulatory gap with potentially inappropriate risk management. But how to assess materials that are still under development? Here we present the Advanced Materials Earliest Assessment (AMEA) approach to fill this gap by proposing simple assessment steps and guidance for design rules meant to be applied by innovators in early material development phases (ideation, business case and lab phases). AMEA provides a structured approach to exploit the available knowledge at each phase, starting from the intended product, application and global region, starting also from the conventional material in the same application, of which the sustainability benefits and sustainability challenges often constitute the motivation for advanced material development. During the lab phase, AMEA recommends focusing on acquisition of data with discriminating power, and triggers more requirements and/or specific testing methods depending on the positioning of the material with respect to the three dimensions “nano-enabled?”, “advanced?”, and “containing particles?” The methodological part can be amended for other material classes without relevance of nanostructures. Similarity and ranking approaches compare material versions synthesized in lab phases against each other and the conventional material in terms of performance, lifecycle emissions/exposures and hazards. AMEA prioritizes the discriminating power of specific data to refine the design targets instead of using generic assumptions with high uncertainties. It is the entry point of the HARMLESS decision support system covering the ensuing pilot and launch phases of innovation management to fulfill safe-and-sustainable-by-design material development.</p>","PeriodicalId":73,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Nano","volume":" 7","pages":" 2948-2967"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/en/d3en00831b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced materials earliest assessment (AMEA)†\",\"authors\":\"Wendel Wohlleben, Michael Persson, Blanca Suarez-Merino, Anders Baun, Veronica Di Battista, Susan Dekkers, Eugene P. van Someren, Dirk Broßell, Burkhard Stahlmecke, Martin Wiemann, Otmar Schmid and Andrea Haase\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D3EN00831B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Advanced materials are rapidly being developed in different material categories. They share little commonalities apart from their novelty, which raises concerns that these materials may fall into a regulatory gap with potentially inappropriate risk management. But how to assess materials that are still under development? Here we present the Advanced Materials Earliest Assessment (AMEA) approach to fill this gap by proposing simple assessment steps and guidance for design rules meant to be applied by innovators in early material development phases (ideation, business case and lab phases). AMEA provides a structured approach to exploit the available knowledge at each phase, starting from the intended product, application and global region, starting also from the conventional material in the same application, of which the sustainability benefits and sustainability challenges often constitute the motivation for advanced material development. During the lab phase, AMEA recommends focusing on acquisition of data with discriminating power, and triggers more requirements and/or specific testing methods depending on the positioning of the material with respect to the three dimensions “nano-enabled?”, “advanced?”, and “containing particles?” The methodological part can be amended for other material classes without relevance of nanostructures. Similarity and ranking approaches compare material versions synthesized in lab phases against each other and the conventional material in terms of performance, lifecycle emissions/exposures and hazards. AMEA prioritizes the discriminating power of specific data to refine the design targets instead of using generic assumptions with high uncertainties. It is the entry point of the HARMLESS decision support system covering the ensuing pilot and launch phases of innovation management to fulfill safe-and-sustainable-by-design material development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Nano\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\" 2948-2967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/en/d3en00831b?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Nano\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/en/d3en00831b\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Nano","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/en/d3en00831b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同材料类别的先进材料正在迅速发展。除了新颖性之外,这些材料几乎没有共同点,这不禁让人担心这些材料可能会陷入监管空白,并可能带来不恰当的风险管理。但如何评估仍在开发中的材料呢?在此,我们提出了 "先进材料早期评估"(AMEA)方法,通过提出简单的评估步骤和设计规则指南来填补这一空白,供创新者在早期材料开发阶段(构思、商业案例和实验室阶段)使用。AMEA 方法提供了一种结构化方法,可在每个阶段利用现有知识,从预期产品、应用和全球地区开始,也从相同应用中的传统材料开始,其中的可持续性优势和可持续性挑战往往是先进材料开发的动机。在实验室阶段,AMEA 建议将重点放在获取具有鉴别力的数据上,并根据材料在 "纳米功能?"、"先进?"和 "含有颗粒?"三个方面的定位,提出更多要求和/或特定测试方法。方法论部分可针对与纳米结构无关的其他材料类别进行修改。相似性和排序法将实验室阶段合成的材料版本与传统材料在性能、生命周期排放/暴露和危害方面进行比较。AMEA 优先考虑具体数据的鉴别能力,以完善设计目标,而不是使用具有高度不确定性的通用假设。它是 HARMLESS 决策支持系统的切入点,涵盖随后的创新管理试点和启动阶段,以实现安全、可持续的设计材料开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advanced materials earliest assessment (AMEA)†

Advanced materials earliest assessment (AMEA)†

Advanced materials are rapidly being developed in different material categories. They share little commonalities apart from their novelty, which raises concerns that these materials may fall into a regulatory gap with potentially inappropriate risk management. But how to assess materials that are still under development? Here we present the Advanced Materials Earliest Assessment (AMEA) approach to fill this gap by proposing simple assessment steps and guidance for design rules meant to be applied by innovators in early material development phases (ideation, business case and lab phases). AMEA provides a structured approach to exploit the available knowledge at each phase, starting from the intended product, application and global region, starting also from the conventional material in the same application, of which the sustainability benefits and sustainability challenges often constitute the motivation for advanced material development. During the lab phase, AMEA recommends focusing on acquisition of data with discriminating power, and triggers more requirements and/or specific testing methods depending on the positioning of the material with respect to the three dimensions “nano-enabled?”, “advanced?”, and “containing particles?” The methodological part can be amended for other material classes without relevance of nanostructures. Similarity and ranking approaches compare material versions synthesized in lab phases against each other and the conventional material in terms of performance, lifecycle emissions/exposures and hazards. AMEA prioritizes the discriminating power of specific data to refine the design targets instead of using generic assumptions with high uncertainties. It is the entry point of the HARMLESS decision support system covering the ensuing pilot and launch phases of innovation management to fulfill safe-and-sustainable-by-design material development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Nano
Environmental Science: Nano CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Nano serves as a comprehensive and high-impact peer-reviewed source of information on the design and demonstration of engineered nanomaterials for environment-based applications. It also covers the interactions between engineered, natural, and incidental nanomaterials with biological and environmental systems. This scope includes, but is not limited to, the following topic areas: Novel nanomaterial-based applications for water, air, soil, food, and energy sustainability Nanomaterial interactions with biological systems and nanotoxicology Environmental fate, reactivity, and transformations of nanoscale materials Nanoscale processes in the environment Sustainable nanotechnology including rational nanomaterial design, life cycle assessment, risk/benefit analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信