澳大利亚关于医疗专业人员对住院儿童疼痛护理中电子病历的使用和实用性的看法调查。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Nicole Pope, Janelle Keyser, Dianne Crellin, Greta Palmer, Mike South, Denise Harrison
{"title":"澳大利亚关于医疗专业人员对住院儿童疼痛护理中电子病历的使用和实用性的看法调查。","authors":"Nicole Pope, Janelle Keyser, Dianne Crellin, Greta Palmer, Mike South, Denise Harrison","doi":"10.1177/13674935241256254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain in hospitalised children is common, yet inadequately treated. Electronic medical records (EMRs) can improve care quality and outcomes during hospitalisation. Little is known about how clinicians use EMRs in caring for children with pain. This national cross-sectional survey examined the perceptions of clinician-EMR users about current and potential use of EMRs in children's pain care. One hundred and ninety-four clinicians responded (<i>n</i> = 81, 74% nurses; <i>n</i> = 21, 19% doctors; <i>n</i> = 7, 6% other); most used Epic (<i>n</i> = 53/109, 49%) or Cerner (<i>n</i> = 42/109, 38%). Most (<i>n</i> = 84/113, 74%) agreed EMRs supported their initiation of pharmacological pain interventions. Fewer agreed EMRs supported initiation of physical (<i>n</i> = 49/113, 43%) or psychological interventions (<i>n</i> = 41/111, 37%). Forty-four percent reported their EMR had prompt reminders for pain care. Prompts were perceived as useful (<i>n</i> = 40/51, 78%). Most agreed EMRs supported pain care provision (<i>n</i> = 94/110, 85%) and documentation (<i>n</i> = 99/111, 89%). Only 39% (<i>n</i> = 40/102) agreed EMRs improved pain treatment, and 31% (<i>n</i> = 32/103) agreed EMRs improved how they involve children and families in pain care. Findings provide recommendations for EMR designs that support clinicians' understanding of the multidimensionality of children's pain and drive comprehensive assessments and treatments. This contribution will inform future translational research on harnessing technology to support child and family partnerships in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Australian survey of health professionals' perceptions of use and usefulness of electronic medical records in hospitalised children's pain care.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Pope, Janelle Keyser, Dianne Crellin, Greta Palmer, Mike South, Denise Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13674935241256254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pain in hospitalised children is common, yet inadequately treated. Electronic medical records (EMRs) can improve care quality and outcomes during hospitalisation. Little is known about how clinicians use EMRs in caring for children with pain. This national cross-sectional survey examined the perceptions of clinician-EMR users about current and potential use of EMRs in children's pain care. One hundred and ninety-four clinicians responded (<i>n</i> = 81, 74% nurses; <i>n</i> = 21, 19% doctors; <i>n</i> = 7, 6% other); most used Epic (<i>n</i> = 53/109, 49%) or Cerner (<i>n</i> = 42/109, 38%). Most (<i>n</i> = 84/113, 74%) agreed EMRs supported their initiation of pharmacological pain interventions. Fewer agreed EMRs supported initiation of physical (<i>n</i> = 49/113, 43%) or psychological interventions (<i>n</i> = 41/111, 37%). Forty-four percent reported their EMR had prompt reminders for pain care. Prompts were perceived as useful (<i>n</i> = 40/51, 78%). Most agreed EMRs supported pain care provision (<i>n</i> = 94/110, 85%) and documentation (<i>n</i> = 99/111, 89%). Only 39% (<i>n</i> = 40/102) agreed EMRs improved pain treatment, and 31% (<i>n</i> = 32/103) agreed EMRs improved how they involve children and families in pain care. Findings provide recommendations for EMR designs that support clinicians' understanding of the multidimensionality of children's pain and drive comprehensive assessments and treatments. This contribution will inform future translational research on harnessing technology to support child and family partnerships in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935241256254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935241256254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住院儿童疼痛很常见,但治疗效果不佳。电子病历(EMR)可以提高住院期间的护理质量和效果。关于临床医生在护理疼痛儿童时如何使用 EMR,人们知之甚少。这项全国性横断面调查研究了临床医生-EMR 用户对当前和潜在使用 EMR 治疗儿童疼痛的看法。有 194 名临床医生做出了回应(n = 81,74% 为护士;n = 21,19% 为医生;n = 7,6% 为其他);大多数人使用 Epic(n = 53/109,49%)或 Cerner(n = 42/109,38%)。大多数人(n = 84/113,74%)同意 EMR 支持他们启动药物疼痛干预。较少的人同意 EMR 支持启动物理(n = 49/113,43%)或心理干预(n = 41/111,37%)。44%的人称他们的电子病历具有疼痛护理提示功能。提示被认为是有用的(n = 40/51,78%)。大多数人同意 EMR 支持疼痛护理的提供(n = 94/110,85%)和记录(n = 99/111,89%)。只有39%(n=40/102)的人认为电子病历改善了疼痛治疗,31%(n=32/103)的人认为电子病历改善了他们让儿童和家庭参与疼痛护理的方式。研究结果为支持临床医生理解儿童疼痛的多维性并推动全面评估和治疗的电子病历设计提供了建议。这项研究成果将为未来利用科技支持儿童和家庭合作护理的转化研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Australian survey of health professionals' perceptions of use and usefulness of electronic medical records in hospitalised children's pain care.

Pain in hospitalised children is common, yet inadequately treated. Electronic medical records (EMRs) can improve care quality and outcomes during hospitalisation. Little is known about how clinicians use EMRs in caring for children with pain. This national cross-sectional survey examined the perceptions of clinician-EMR users about current and potential use of EMRs in children's pain care. One hundred and ninety-four clinicians responded (n = 81, 74% nurses; n = 21, 19% doctors; n = 7, 6% other); most used Epic (n = 53/109, 49%) or Cerner (n = 42/109, 38%). Most (n = 84/113, 74%) agreed EMRs supported their initiation of pharmacological pain interventions. Fewer agreed EMRs supported initiation of physical (n = 49/113, 43%) or psychological interventions (n = 41/111, 37%). Forty-four percent reported their EMR had prompt reminders for pain care. Prompts were perceived as useful (n = 40/51, 78%). Most agreed EMRs supported pain care provision (n = 94/110, 85%) and documentation (n = 99/111, 89%). Only 39% (n = 40/102) agreed EMRs improved pain treatment, and 31% (n = 32/103) agreed EMRs improved how they involve children and families in pain care. Findings provide recommendations for EMR designs that support clinicians' understanding of the multidimensionality of children's pain and drive comprehensive assessments and treatments. This contribution will inform future translational research on harnessing technology to support child and family partnerships in care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信