CBCT 成像中偶然发现的频率和临床意义:对全容积扫描的回顾性分析。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2024-03-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2024.15105
Charis Theodoridis, Spyros Damaskos, Christos Angelopoulos
{"title":"CBCT 成像中偶然发现的频率和临床意义:对全容积扫描的回顾性分析。","authors":"Charis Theodoridis, Spyros Damaskos, Christos Angelopoulos","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2024.15105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective study aims to identify incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients irradiated for preoperative evaluation for implant placement and obtained using the same imaging unit as well as the same field of view. The incidence of each incidental finding, as well as the overall incidence, were calculated and the findings were ranked according to their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 741 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations with extended field of view (15 x 15 cm) were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings (IFs). These were identified, recorded, classified as to their location, and ranked according to their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority of CBCT examinations presented at least one IF, resulting in a surprisingly high prevalence in total. If extreme anatomical variants are considered (nasal septum deviation, sinus septations etc.), the cumulative prevalence exceeds 99%. IFs of major significance, that may require immediate attention, are beyond 10% in frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found high prevalence of incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomography examinations performed for preoperative evaluation for implant placement (99.5% if anatomical variants included). Most incidental findings were of minor significance. Although the number of incidental findings that require immediate attention is relatively low, there is a considerable number of cases that need periodic evaluation and/or referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":53254,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings on CBCT Imaging: a Retrospective Analysis of Full-Volume Scans.\",\"authors\":\"Charis Theodoridis, Spyros Damaskos, Christos Angelopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.5037/jomr.2024.15105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective study aims to identify incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients irradiated for preoperative evaluation for implant placement and obtained using the same imaging unit as well as the same field of view. The incidence of each incidental finding, as well as the overall incidence, were calculated and the findings were ranked according to their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 741 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations with extended field of view (15 x 15 cm) were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings (IFs). These were identified, recorded, classified as to their location, and ranked according to their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority of CBCT examinations presented at least one IF, resulting in a surprisingly high prevalence in total. If extreme anatomical variants are considered (nasal septum deviation, sinus septations etc.), the cumulative prevalence exceeds 99%. IFs of major significance, that may require immediate attention, are beyond 10% in frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found high prevalence of incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomography examinations performed for preoperative evaluation for implant placement (99.5% if anatomical variants included). Most incidental findings were of minor significance. Although the number of incidental findings that require immediate attention is relatively low, there is a considerable number of cases that need periodic evaluation and/or referral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2024.15105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2024.15105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项回顾性研究旨在确定锥形束计算机断层扫描扫描中的偶然发现,这些扫描是在对患者进行种植体植入术前评估时使用同一成像设备和同一视野获得的。我们计算了每种偶然发现的发生率以及总体发生率,并根据其临床意义对这些发现进行了排序:对 741 例扩大视野(15 x 15 厘米)的锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查进行了回顾性评估,以发现偶发病变(IFs)。我们对这些结果进行了识别、记录、位置分类,并根据其临床意义进行了排序:结果:绝大多数 CBCT 检查结果都至少有一个 IF,其总发生率之高令人惊讶。如果考虑到极端的解剖变异(鼻中隔偏曲、鼻窦隔等),累计发生率超过 99%。具有重大意义、可能需要立即关注的 IFs 频率超过 10%:我们发现,在为种植体植入进行术前评估而进行的锥形束计算机断层扫描检查中,偶然发现的比例很高(如果包括解剖变异,则为 99.5%)。大多数偶然发现的意义不大。虽然需要立即关注的偶然发现数量相对较少,但仍有相当数量的病例需要定期评估和/或转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings on CBCT Imaging: a Retrospective Analysis of Full-Volume Scans.

Objectives: This retrospective study aims to identify incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients irradiated for preoperative evaluation for implant placement and obtained using the same imaging unit as well as the same field of view. The incidence of each incidental finding, as well as the overall incidence, were calculated and the findings were ranked according to their clinical significance.

Material and methods: A total of 741 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations with extended field of view (15 x 15 cm) were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings (IFs). These were identified, recorded, classified as to their location, and ranked according to their clinical significance.

Results: The vast majority of CBCT examinations presented at least one IF, resulting in a surprisingly high prevalence in total. If extreme anatomical variants are considered (nasal septum deviation, sinus septations etc.), the cumulative prevalence exceeds 99%. IFs of major significance, that may require immediate attention, are beyond 10% in frequency.

Conclusions: We found high prevalence of incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomography examinations performed for preoperative evaluation for implant placement (99.5% if anatomical variants included). Most incidental findings were of minor significance. Although the number of incidental findings that require immediate attention is relatively low, there is a considerable number of cases that need periodic evaluation and/or referral.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信