急性支气管扩张后峰值吸气流量的变化:对稳定型慢性阻塞性肺病患者的观察研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Roy A Pleasants, Asif Shaikh, Ashley G Henderson, Valentina Bayer, M Bradley Drummond
{"title":"急性支气管扩张后峰值吸气流量的变化:对稳定型慢性阻塞性肺病患者的观察研究。","authors":"Roy A Pleasants, Asif Shaikh, Ashley G Henderson, Valentina Bayer, M Bradley Drummond","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2023.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Identifying factors influencing peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is essential for aerosol drug delivery in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. While a minimum PIF for dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is established, acute bronchodilator (BD) effects on PIF remain unknown. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> An inspiratory flow meter (In-Check™ DIAL) was used to measure PIF in stable patients during a 24-week observational cross-sectional study. Additionally, bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) was determined using the In-Check DIAL device and spirometry. Patients received four puffs of albuterol, and pre- and post-BD PIF, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and forced vital capacity were measured. Sixty-three patients completed acute BDR data collection from July 31, 2019, to November 9, 2021. Primary endpoints were pre- and post-BD spirometry and PIF. Statistical analyses included PIF correlations with FEV<sub>1</sub>. BD change was assessed according to inhaler resistance and sex (subgroup analysis). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median patient age was 64.8 years, 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 57.1% were female. The median increase in absolute PIF (In-Check DIAL) was 5.0 L/min, and the % PIF change was 8.9%. With albuterol, 57.1% experienced a PIF BD change >5.0%, whereas 49.2% experienced a change >10.0%. Similarly, 55.6% experienced an FEV<sub>1</sub> BD change >5.0% and 28.6% had a >10.0% FEV<sub>1</sub> BD change with albuterol. PIF was weakly correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub> BD change (absolute; % PIF; <i>r</i> = 0.28 [<i>p</i> = 0.02]; <i>r</i> = 0.21 [<i>p</i> = 0.11]). Pre- and post-BD median PIF were 75.5 and 83.5 L/min for low-to-medium-resistance DPI and 45.0 and 52.0 L/min for high-resistance, respectively. The median increases in pre- and post-BD PIF were 9.0 L/min in males and 4.5 L/min in females. In contrast to when using the In-Check DIAL device, we observed no consistent bronchodilatory effects on PIF measured by spirometry. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Using the In-Check DIAL device, ∼50% of patients experienced >10% PIF increase after acute BD, potentially enhancing medication lung deposition. Further research is required to understand PIF's impact on medication delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04168775.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"171-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Peak Inspiratory Flow After Acute Bronchodilation: An Observational Study of Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Roy A Pleasants, Asif Shaikh, Ashley G Henderson, Valentina Bayer, M Bradley Drummond\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jamp.2023.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Identifying factors influencing peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is essential for aerosol drug delivery in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. While a minimum PIF for dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is established, acute bronchodilator (BD) effects on PIF remain unknown. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> An inspiratory flow meter (In-Check™ DIAL) was used to measure PIF in stable patients during a 24-week observational cross-sectional study. Additionally, bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) was determined using the In-Check DIAL device and spirometry. Patients received four puffs of albuterol, and pre- and post-BD PIF, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and forced vital capacity were measured. Sixty-three patients completed acute BDR data collection from July 31, 2019, to November 9, 2021. Primary endpoints were pre- and post-BD spirometry and PIF. Statistical analyses included PIF correlations with FEV<sub>1</sub>. BD change was assessed according to inhaler resistance and sex (subgroup analysis). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Median patient age was 64.8 years, 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 57.1% were female. The median increase in absolute PIF (In-Check DIAL) was 5.0 L/min, and the % PIF change was 8.9%. With albuterol, 57.1% experienced a PIF BD change >5.0%, whereas 49.2% experienced a change >10.0%. Similarly, 55.6% experienced an FEV<sub>1</sub> BD change >5.0% and 28.6% had a >10.0% FEV<sub>1</sub> BD change with albuterol. PIF was weakly correlated with FEV<sub>1</sub> BD change (absolute; % PIF; <i>r</i> = 0.28 [<i>p</i> = 0.02]; <i>r</i> = 0.21 [<i>p</i> = 0.11]). Pre- and post-BD median PIF were 75.5 and 83.5 L/min for low-to-medium-resistance DPI and 45.0 and 52.0 L/min for high-resistance, respectively. The median increases in pre- and post-BD PIF were 9.0 L/min in males and 4.5 L/min in females. In contrast to when using the In-Check DIAL device, we observed no consistent bronchodilatory effects on PIF measured by spirometry. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Using the In-Check DIAL device, ∼50% of patients experienced >10% PIF increase after acute BD, potentially enhancing medication lung deposition. Further research is required to understand PIF's impact on medication delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04168775.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"171-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2023.0045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2023.0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:确定影响吸气峰流速(PIF)的因素对于慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期患者的气溶胶给药至关重要。虽然干粉吸入器(DPI)的最低吸入峰流速已经确定,但急性支气管扩张剂(BD)对吸入峰流速的影响仍然未知。材料和方法:在一项为期 24 周的横断面观察研究中,使用吸气流量计(In-Check™ DIAL)测量稳定期患者的 PIF。此外,还使用 In-Check DIAL 设备和肺活量计测定支气管扩张剂反应性 (BDR)。患者接受四次阿布特罗治疗,并测量支气管扩张前后的 PIF、一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)和用力肺活量。63 名患者在 2019 年 7 月 31 日至 2021 年 11 月 9 日期间完成了急性 BDR 数据收集。主要终点是 BDR 前后的肺活量和 PIF。统计分析包括 PIF 与 FEV1 的相关性。根据吸入器阻力和性别评估 BD 变化(亚组分析)。结果患者年龄中位数为 64.8 岁,85.7% 为非西班牙裔白人,57.1% 为女性。绝对 PIF(In-Check DIAL)增加的中位数为 5.0 升/分钟,PIF 变化的百分比为 8.9%。使用沙丁胺醇时,57.1% 的患者 PIF BD 变化大于 5.0%,而 49.2% 的患者 PIF BD 变化大于 10.0%。同样,使用阿布特罗后,55.6% 的患者 FEV1 BD 变化大于 5.0%,28.6% 的患者 FEV1 BD 变化大于 10.0%。PIF 与 FEV1 BD 变化呈弱相关(绝对值;PIF 百分比;r = 0.28 [p = 0.02];r = 0.21 [p = 0.11])。对于中低阻力 DPI 患者,BD 前和 BD 后的 PIF 中位数分别为 75.5 和 83.5 升/分钟;对于高阻力患者,分别为 45.0 和 52.0 升/分钟。BD 前和 BD 后 PIF 的中位增加值分别为:男性 9.0 升/分钟,女性 4.5 升/分钟。与使用 In-Check DIAL 设备时不同的是,我们没有观察到支气管扩张对肺活量测量的 PIF 有一致的影响。结论:使用 In-Check DIAL 设备,50% 的患者在急性 BD 后 PIF 增加了 10%,这可能会增加药物在肺部的沉积。要了解 PIF 对药物输送的影响,还需要进一步的研究。ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04168775。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Peak Inspiratory Flow After Acute Bronchodilation: An Observational Study of Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Introduction: Identifying factors influencing peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is essential for aerosol drug delivery in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. While a minimum PIF for dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is established, acute bronchodilator (BD) effects on PIF remain unknown. Materials and Methods: An inspiratory flow meter (In-Check™ DIAL) was used to measure PIF in stable patients during a 24-week observational cross-sectional study. Additionally, bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) was determined using the In-Check DIAL device and spirometry. Patients received four puffs of albuterol, and pre- and post-BD PIF, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity were measured. Sixty-three patients completed acute BDR data collection from July 31, 2019, to November 9, 2021. Primary endpoints were pre- and post-BD spirometry and PIF. Statistical analyses included PIF correlations with FEV1. BD change was assessed according to inhaler resistance and sex (subgroup analysis). Results: Median patient age was 64.8 years, 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 57.1% were female. The median increase in absolute PIF (In-Check DIAL) was 5.0 L/min, and the % PIF change was 8.9%. With albuterol, 57.1% experienced a PIF BD change >5.0%, whereas 49.2% experienced a change >10.0%. Similarly, 55.6% experienced an FEV1 BD change >5.0% and 28.6% had a >10.0% FEV1 BD change with albuterol. PIF was weakly correlated with FEV1 BD change (absolute; % PIF; r = 0.28 [p = 0.02]; r = 0.21 [p = 0.11]). Pre- and post-BD median PIF were 75.5 and 83.5 L/min for low-to-medium-resistance DPI and 45.0 and 52.0 L/min for high-resistance, respectively. The median increases in pre- and post-BD PIF were 9.0 L/min in males and 4.5 L/min in females. In contrast to when using the In-Check DIAL device, we observed no consistent bronchodilatory effects on PIF measured by spirometry. Conclusions: Using the In-Check DIAL device, ∼50% of patients experienced >10% PIF increase after acute BD, potentially enhancing medication lung deposition. Further research is required to understand PIF's impact on medication delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04168775.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信