{"title":"用于诊断中枢神经系统曲霉菌病的脑脊液半乳甘露聚糖检测:诊断测试准确性系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cerebrospinal fluid<span> (CSF) galactomannan<span><span> is an adjunctive test for central nervous system (CNS) </span>aspergillosis diagnosis with unclear diagnostic test characteristics.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>To evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of CSF galactomannan in CNS </span>aspergillosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p><span>MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and </span>Scopus, from inception to 24 February 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><p>Prospective and retrospective studies with 1-group and 2-group designs using any galactomannan<span> assay on CSF to diagnose CNS aspergillosis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adult and/or paediatric patients with CNS aspergillosis.</p></div><div><h3>Test(s)</h3><p>Galactomannan testing on CSF specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Reference standard</h3><p><span>European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the </span>Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) diagnostic criteria, or equivalent.</p></div><div><h3>Assessment of risk of bias</h3><p>QUADAS-2 assessment in duplicate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods of data synthesis</h3><p>Bivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation random-effects meta-analysis, summarized using forest and summary receiver operating characteristic plots; bivariate meta-regression models to investigate heterogeneity; and subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore subgroup effects and methodologic choices (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022296331; funding: none).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included eight studies (<em>n =</em><span> 342 participants). The summary estimates of CSF galactomannan<span> sensitivity and specificity were 69.0% (95% CI, 57.2–78.7%) and 94.4% (95% CI, 82.8–98.3%), respectively. Using meta-regression, galactomannan cut-off (p = 0.38), EORTC/MSGERC criteria version (p = 0.48), or whether the reference standard was defined as both proven and probable or only proven aspergillosis (p = 0.48) did not explain observed heterogeneity. No subgroup effects were demonstrated by analysing the EORTC/MSGERC criteria reference standard used (e.g. 2002 vs. 2008 definitions) or whether paediatric patients were included. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved using a galactomannan cut-off of 1.0, and by excluding high risk of bias and 1-group design studies.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>CSF galactomannan is a highly specific but insensitive test for use as a component of CNS aspergillosis diagnosis. Few included studies, no prospective studies, and a high risk of bias are study limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebrospinal fluid galactomannan detection for the diagnosis of central nervous system aspergillosis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cerebrospinal fluid<span> (CSF) galactomannan<span><span> is an adjunctive test for central nervous system (CNS) </span>aspergillosis diagnosis with unclear diagnostic test characteristics.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>To evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of CSF galactomannan in CNS </span>aspergillosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p><span>MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and </span>Scopus, from inception to 24 February 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><p>Prospective and retrospective studies with 1-group and 2-group designs using any galactomannan<span> assay on CSF to diagnose CNS aspergillosis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adult and/or paediatric patients with CNS aspergillosis.</p></div><div><h3>Test(s)</h3><p>Galactomannan testing on CSF specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Reference standard</h3><p><span>European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the </span>Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) diagnostic criteria, or equivalent.</p></div><div><h3>Assessment of risk of bias</h3><p>QUADAS-2 assessment in duplicate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods of data synthesis</h3><p>Bivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation random-effects meta-analysis, summarized using forest and summary receiver operating characteristic plots; bivariate meta-regression models to investigate heterogeneity; and subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore subgroup effects and methodologic choices (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022296331; funding: none).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included eight studies (<em>n =</em><span> 342 participants). The summary estimates of CSF galactomannan<span> sensitivity and specificity were 69.0% (95% CI, 57.2–78.7%) and 94.4% (95% CI, 82.8–98.3%), respectively. Using meta-regression, galactomannan cut-off (p = 0.38), EORTC/MSGERC criteria version (p = 0.48), or whether the reference standard was defined as both proven and probable or only proven aspergillosis (p = 0.48) did not explain observed heterogeneity. No subgroup effects were demonstrated by analysing the EORTC/MSGERC criteria reference standard used (e.g. 2002 vs. 2008 definitions) or whether paediatric patients were included. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved using a galactomannan cut-off of 1.0, and by excluding high risk of bias and 1-group design studies.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>CSF galactomannan is a highly specific but insensitive test for use as a component of CNS aspergillosis diagnosis. Few included studies, no prospective studies, and a high risk of bias are study limitations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24002507\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X24002507","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:脑脊液(CSF)半乳甘露聚糖是中枢神经系统(CNS)曲霉菌病诊断的一种辅助检查,但其诊断特点尚不明确:评估CSF半乳甘露聚糖在中枢神经系统曲霉菌病中的诊断检测特点:系统综述和荟萃分析:研究资格标准:使用任何半乳甘露聚糖检测CSF诊断中枢神经系统曲霉菌病的单组和两组设计的前瞻性和回顾性研究:成人和/或儿童中枢神经系统曲霉菌病患者:参考标准:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer):参考标准:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织和霉菌病研究小组教育与研究联合会(EORTC/MSGERC)诊断标准或同等标准:QUADAS-2评估一式两份:双变量限制最大似然估计随机效应荟萃分析,使用森林图和接受者-操作者特征汇总图进行总结;双变量元回归模型研究异质性;亚组和敏感性分析研究亚组效应和方法学选择(PROSPERO 注册:CRD42022296331;资金:无):我们纳入了 8 项研究(n=342 名参与者)。CSF半乳甘露聚糖敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值分别为69.0%(95% CI:57.2-78.7%)和94.4%(95% CI:82.8-98.3%)。通过元回归,半乳甘露聚糖截断值(p=0.38)、EORTC/MSGERC 标准版本(p=0.48)、参考标准是被定义为已证实和可能的曲霉菌病还是仅被证实的曲霉菌病(p=0.48)均不能解释观察到的异质性。通过分析所使用的 EORTC/MSGERC 标准参考标准(如 2002 年定义与 2008 年定义)或是否纳入儿科患者,均未发现亚组效应。将半乳甘露聚糖的临界值定为1.0,并排除高偏倚风险和单组设计的研究,可提高诊断灵敏度:讨论:脑脊液半乳甘露聚糖是一种特异性很高但灵敏度不高的检测方法,可作为中枢神经系统曲霉菌病诊断的组成部分。纳入的研究较少、没有前瞻性研究以及高偏倚风险是研究的局限性。
Cerebrospinal fluid galactomannan detection for the diagnosis of central nervous system aspergillosis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) galactomannan is an adjunctive test for central nervous system (CNS) aspergillosis diagnosis with unclear diagnostic test characteristics.
Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of CSF galactomannan in CNS aspergillosis.
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources
MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, from inception to 24 February 2023.
Study eligibility criteria
Prospective and retrospective studies with 1-group and 2-group designs using any galactomannan assay on CSF to diagnose CNS aspergillosis.
Participants
Adult and/or paediatric patients with CNS aspergillosis.
Test(s)
Galactomannan testing on CSF specimens.
Reference standard
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) diagnostic criteria, or equivalent.
Assessment of risk of bias
QUADAS-2 assessment in duplicate.
Methods of data synthesis
Bivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation random-effects meta-analysis, summarized using forest and summary receiver operating characteristic plots; bivariate meta-regression models to investigate heterogeneity; and subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore subgroup effects and methodologic choices (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022296331; funding: none).
Results
We included eight studies (n = 342 participants). The summary estimates of CSF galactomannan sensitivity and specificity were 69.0% (95% CI, 57.2–78.7%) and 94.4% (95% CI, 82.8–98.3%), respectively. Using meta-regression, galactomannan cut-off (p = 0.38), EORTC/MSGERC criteria version (p = 0.48), or whether the reference standard was defined as both proven and probable or only proven aspergillosis (p = 0.48) did not explain observed heterogeneity. No subgroup effects were demonstrated by analysing the EORTC/MSGERC criteria reference standard used (e.g. 2002 vs. 2008 definitions) or whether paediatric patients were included. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved using a galactomannan cut-off of 1.0, and by excluding high risk of bias and 1-group design studies.
Discussion
CSF galactomannan is a highly specific but insensitive test for use as a component of CNS aspergillosis diagnosis. Few included studies, no prospective studies, and a high risk of bias are study limitations.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.