{"title":"印度 CMIP6 GCM 日降雨量的降尺度算法","authors":"Rajendra Raj, Degavath Vinod, Amai Mahesha","doi":"10.1007/s12040-024-02323-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global climate models (GCMs) are sophisticated tools for determining how the climate system will respond. However, the output of GCMs has a coarse resolution, which is unsuitable for basin-level modelling. Global climate models need to be downscaled at a local/basin scale to determine the impacts of climate change on hydrological responses. The present study attempted to evaluate how effectively various large-scale predictors could reproduce local-scale rain in 35 different locations in India using artificial neural networks (ANN), change-factors (CF), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), and multiple linear regression (MLR). The selection of predictors is made based on the correlation value. As potential predictors, air temperature, geo-potential height, wind velocity component, and relative humidity at specific mean sea-level pressure are selected. The comparison of four different downscaling methods concerning the reproduction of various statistics such as mean, standard deviation at chosen locations, quantile–quantile plots, cumulative distribution function, and kernel density estimation of the PDFs of daily rainfall for selected stations is examined. The CF approach outperforms the other methods at almost all sites (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.92–0.99, RMSE = 1.37–28.88 mm, and NSE = –16.55–0.99). This also closely resembles the probability distribution pattern of IMD data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Earth System Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Downscaling algorithms for CMIP6 GCM daily rainfall over India\",\"authors\":\"Rajendra Raj, Degavath Vinod, Amai Mahesha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12040-024-02323-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The global climate models (GCMs) are sophisticated tools for determining how the climate system will respond. However, the output of GCMs has a coarse resolution, which is unsuitable for basin-level modelling. Global climate models need to be downscaled at a local/basin scale to determine the impacts of climate change on hydrological responses. The present study attempted to evaluate how effectively various large-scale predictors could reproduce local-scale rain in 35 different locations in India using artificial neural networks (ANN), change-factors (CF), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), and multiple linear regression (MLR). The selection of predictors is made based on the correlation value. As potential predictors, air temperature, geo-potential height, wind velocity component, and relative humidity at specific mean sea-level pressure are selected. The comparison of four different downscaling methods concerning the reproduction of various statistics such as mean, standard deviation at chosen locations, quantile–quantile plots, cumulative distribution function, and kernel density estimation of the PDFs of daily rainfall for selected stations is examined. The CF approach outperforms the other methods at almost all sites (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.92–0.99, RMSE = 1.37–28.88 mm, and NSE = –16.55–0.99). This also closely resembles the probability distribution pattern of IMD data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Earth System Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Earth System Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02323-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Earth System Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02323-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Downscaling algorithms for CMIP6 GCM daily rainfall over India
The global climate models (GCMs) are sophisticated tools for determining how the climate system will respond. However, the output of GCMs has a coarse resolution, which is unsuitable for basin-level modelling. Global climate models need to be downscaled at a local/basin scale to determine the impacts of climate change on hydrological responses. The present study attempted to evaluate how effectively various large-scale predictors could reproduce local-scale rain in 35 different locations in India using artificial neural networks (ANN), change-factors (CF), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), and multiple linear regression (MLR). The selection of predictors is made based on the correlation value. As potential predictors, air temperature, geo-potential height, wind velocity component, and relative humidity at specific mean sea-level pressure are selected. The comparison of four different downscaling methods concerning the reproduction of various statistics such as mean, standard deviation at chosen locations, quantile–quantile plots, cumulative distribution function, and kernel density estimation of the PDFs of daily rainfall for selected stations is examined. The CF approach outperforms the other methods at almost all sites (R2 = 0.92–0.99, RMSE = 1.37–28.88 mm, and NSE = –16.55–0.99). This also closely resembles the probability distribution pattern of IMD data.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Earth System Science, an International Journal, was earlier a part of the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences – Section A begun in 1934, and later split in 1978 into theme journals. This journal was published as Proceedings – Earth and Planetary Sciences since 1978, and in 2005 was renamed ‘Journal of Earth System Science’.
The journal is highly inter-disciplinary and publishes scholarly research – new data, ideas, and conceptual advances – in Earth System Science. The focus is on the evolution of the Earth as a system: manuscripts describing changes of anthropogenic origin in a limited region are not considered unless they go beyond describing the changes to include an analysis of earth-system processes. The journal''s scope includes the solid earth (geosphere), the atmosphere, the hydrosphere (including cryosphere), and the biosphere; it also addresses related aspects of planetary and space sciences. Contributions pertaining to the Indian sub- continent and the surrounding Indian-Ocean region are particularly welcome. Given that a large number of manuscripts report either observations or model results for a limited domain, manuscripts intended for publication in JESS are expected to fulfill at least one of the following three criteria.
The data should be of relevance and should be of statistically significant size and from a region from where such data are sparse. If the data are from a well-sampled region, the data size should be considerable and advance our knowledge of the region.
A model study is carried out to explain observations reported either in the same manuscript or in the literature.
The analysis, whether of data or with models, is novel and the inferences advance the current knowledge.