对 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的易感性:信号检测分析

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lea S. Nahon , Nyx L. Ng , Bertram Gawronski
{"title":"对 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的易感性:信号检测分析","authors":"Lea S. Nahon ,&nbsp;Nyx L. Ng ,&nbsp;Bertram Gawronski","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An analysis drawing on Signal Detection Theory suggests that people may fall for misinformation because they are unable to discern true from false information (<em>truth insensitivity</em>) or because they tend to accept information with a particular slant regardless of whether it is true or false (<em>belief bias</em>). Three preregistered experiments with participants from the United States and the United Kingdom (<em>N</em> = 961) revealed that (<em>i</em>) truth insensitivity in responses to (mis)information about COVID-19 vaccines differed as a function of prior attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines; (<em>ii</em>) participants exhibited a strong belief bias favoring attitude-congruent information; (<em>iii</em>) truth insensitivity and belief bias jointly predicted acceptance of false information about COVID-19 vaccines, but belief bias was a much stronger predictor; (<em>iv</em>) cognitive elaboration increased truth sensitivity without reducing belief bias; and (<em>v</em>) higher levels of confidence in one's beliefs were associated with greater belief bias. The findings provide insights into why people fall for misinformation, which is essential for individual-level interventions to reduce susceptibility to misinformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines: A signal detection analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lea S. Nahon ,&nbsp;Nyx L. Ng ,&nbsp;Bertram Gawronski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An analysis drawing on Signal Detection Theory suggests that people may fall for misinformation because they are unable to discern true from false information (<em>truth insensitivity</em>) or because they tend to accept information with a particular slant regardless of whether it is true or false (<em>belief bias</em>). Three preregistered experiments with participants from the United States and the United Kingdom (<em>N</em> = 961) revealed that (<em>i</em>) truth insensitivity in responses to (mis)information about COVID-19 vaccines differed as a function of prior attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines; (<em>ii</em>) participants exhibited a strong belief bias favoring attitude-congruent information; (<em>iii</em>) truth insensitivity and belief bias jointly predicted acceptance of false information about COVID-19 vaccines, but belief bias was a much stronger predictor; (<em>iv</em>) cognitive elaboration increased truth sensitivity without reducing belief bias; and (<em>v</em>) higher levels of confidence in one's beliefs were associated with greater belief bias. The findings provide insights into why people fall for misinformation, which is essential for individual-level interventions to reduce susceptibility to misinformation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124000441\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124000441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据信号检测理论(Signal Detection Theory)进行的分析表明,人们之所以会误信错误信息,可能是因为他们无法辨别信息的真伪(对真相不敏感),也可能是因为他们倾向于接受带有特定倾向的信息,而不管该信息是真是假(信念偏差)。对来自美国和英国的参与者(人数=961)进行的三项预先登记的实验表明:(i) 对有关 COVID-19 疫苗的(错误)信息的真假不敏感度因参与者先前对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度而异;(ii) 参与者表现出强烈的信念偏差,倾向于态度一致的信息;(iii) 对真相不敏感和信念偏差共同预测了人们对 COVID-19 疫苗虚假信息的接受程度,但信念偏差的预测作用更大;(iv) 认知阐述提高了对真相的敏感度,但没有减少信念偏差;以及 (v) 对自己信念的信心越高,信念偏差越大。这些发现让我们了解了人们为何会受错误信息的影响,这对于采取个人干预措施以减少对错误信息的易感性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines: A signal detection analysis

An analysis drawing on Signal Detection Theory suggests that people may fall for misinformation because they are unable to discern true from false information (truth insensitivity) or because they tend to accept information with a particular slant regardless of whether it is true or false (belief bias). Three preregistered experiments with participants from the United States and the United Kingdom (N = 961) revealed that (i) truth insensitivity in responses to (mis)information about COVID-19 vaccines differed as a function of prior attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines; (ii) participants exhibited a strong belief bias favoring attitude-congruent information; (iii) truth insensitivity and belief bias jointly predicted acceptance of false information about COVID-19 vaccines, but belief bias was a much stronger predictor; (iv) cognitive elaboration increased truth sensitivity without reducing belief bias; and (v) higher levels of confidence in one's beliefs were associated with greater belief bias. The findings provide insights into why people fall for misinformation, which is essential for individual-level interventions to reduce susceptibility to misinformation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信