A I Kryukov, A S Tovmasyan, A A Lapchenko, A Ya Bolgar, A E Kishinevskii, M G Timofeeva, A V Artemyeva-Karelova, D S Ogorodnikov
{"title":"[急性细菌性上颌窦炎穿刺治疗方法的优化]。","authors":"A I Kryukov, A S Tovmasyan, A A Lapchenko, A Ya Bolgar, A E Kishinevskii, M G Timofeeva, A V Artemyeva-Karelova, D S Ogorodnikov","doi":"10.17116/otorino20248902115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Optimization of the method of puncture treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABMS) through the development of original devices for drainage of the maxillary sinus (MS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Registration and comparative analysis of the results of puncture methods of treatment of 120 patients with ABMS using developed new original devices for drainage of MS with one channels and with two channels in comparison with the Kulikovsky's needle (KN) was carried out. Based on the results of the analysis, the effectiveness of the original devices was assessed. During the clinical study, patients were divided into two groups: in group I, patients underwent of the MS puncture using KN, in group II, using original devices. Groups I and II, depending on the absence or presence of a block of the natural anastomosis MS, was divided into subgroups A and B, respectively. After puncture of the MS, the pain syndrome was assessed by patients using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and by doctors - using Touch Visual Pain (TVP) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed that when puncturing the upper jaw with an original needle with one channels and with two channels, compared with the use of KN, there is a decrease in pain (the average VAS score was 1.5±0.3 and 1.7±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 0.9±0.2 and 1.8±0.3 points, respectively, the difference is significant, <i>p</i>≤0.05). Patients of subgroup IB were manipulated with two KN, patients of subgroup IIB manipulated using the original device with two channels without an additional needle (the average VAS score was 3.0±0.4 and 1.3±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 2.7±0.4 and 1.0±0.2 points, respectively, the difference is significant, <i>p</i>≤0.05). The doctors also assessed the devices used for puncture of the upper jaw. As a result of the study, the high efficiency and safety of using new original devices was established.</p>","PeriodicalId":23575,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","volume":"89 2","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Optimization of the puncture treatment method for acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis].\",\"authors\":\"A I Kryukov, A S Tovmasyan, A A Lapchenko, A Ya Bolgar, A E Kishinevskii, M G Timofeeva, A V Artemyeva-Karelova, D S Ogorodnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/otorino20248902115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Optimization of the method of puncture treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABMS) through the development of original devices for drainage of the maxillary sinus (MS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Registration and comparative analysis of the results of puncture methods of treatment of 120 patients with ABMS using developed new original devices for drainage of MS with one channels and with two channels in comparison with the Kulikovsky's needle (KN) was carried out. Based on the results of the analysis, the effectiveness of the original devices was assessed. During the clinical study, patients were divided into two groups: in group I, patients underwent of the MS puncture using KN, in group II, using original devices. Groups I and II, depending on the absence or presence of a block of the natural anastomosis MS, was divided into subgroups A and B, respectively. After puncture of the MS, the pain syndrome was assessed by patients using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and by doctors - using Touch Visual Pain (TVP) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed that when puncturing the upper jaw with an original needle with one channels and with two channels, compared with the use of KN, there is a decrease in pain (the average VAS score was 1.5±0.3 and 1.7±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 0.9±0.2 and 1.8±0.3 points, respectively, the difference is significant, <i>p</i>≤0.05). Patients of subgroup IB were manipulated with two KN, patients of subgroup IIB manipulated using the original device with two channels without an additional needle (the average VAS score was 3.0±0.4 and 1.3±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 2.7±0.4 and 1.0±0.2 points, respectively, the difference is significant, <i>p</i>≤0.05). The doctors also assessed the devices used for puncture of the upper jaw. As a result of the study, the high efficiency and safety of using new original devices was established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik otorinolaringologii\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik otorinolaringologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20248902115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20248902115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的通过开发独创的上颌窦(MS)引流装置,优化急性细菌性上颌窦炎(ABMS)的穿刺治疗方法:材料和方法:对 120 名急性细菌性上颌窦炎(ABMS)患者的穿刺治疗结果进行了登记和比较分析,这些患者分别使用了新开发的单通道和双通道上颌窦引流原始装置,并与库利科夫斯基针(KN)进行了比较。根据分析结果,评估了原始装置的有效性。在临床研究中,患者被分为两组:I 组患者使用 KN 进行多发性硬化症穿刺,II 组患者使用原始装置。根据自然吻合 MS 是否存在阻塞,I 组和 II 组分别被分为 A 和 B 两组。穿刺 MS 后,患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛综合征,医生使用触觉视觉疼痛量表(TVP)评估疼痛综合征:我们的研究表明,与使用 KN 相比,使用带一个通道和两个通道的原始针头穿刺上颌骨时,疼痛会减轻(VAS 平均分分别为 1.5±0.3 分和 1.7±0.3 分;TVP 量表平均分分别为 0.9±0.2 分和 1.8±0.3 分,差异显著,P≤0.05)。IB 亚组患者使用两根 KN 进行操作,IIB 亚组患者使用原设备的两根通道进行操作,没有额外的针头(VAS 平均分分别为 3.0±0.4 分和 1.3±0.3 分;TVP 量表平均分分别为 2.7±0.4 分和 1.0±0.2 分,差异显著,P≤0.05)。医生们还对上颌骨穿刺所用的器械进行了评估。研究结果表明,使用新型原装设备具有高效性和安全性。
[Optimization of the puncture treatment method for acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis].
Objective: Optimization of the method of puncture treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABMS) through the development of original devices for drainage of the maxillary sinus (MS).
Material and methods: Registration and comparative analysis of the results of puncture methods of treatment of 120 patients with ABMS using developed new original devices for drainage of MS with one channels and with two channels in comparison with the Kulikovsky's needle (KN) was carried out. Based on the results of the analysis, the effectiveness of the original devices was assessed. During the clinical study, patients were divided into two groups: in group I, patients underwent of the MS puncture using KN, in group II, using original devices. Groups I and II, depending on the absence or presence of a block of the natural anastomosis MS, was divided into subgroups A and B, respectively. After puncture of the MS, the pain syndrome was assessed by patients using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and by doctors - using Touch Visual Pain (TVP) scale.
Results: Our study showed that when puncturing the upper jaw with an original needle with one channels and with two channels, compared with the use of KN, there is a decrease in pain (the average VAS score was 1.5±0.3 and 1.7±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 0.9±0.2 and 1.8±0.3 points, respectively, the difference is significant, p≤0.05). Patients of subgroup IB were manipulated with two KN, patients of subgroup IIB manipulated using the original device with two channels without an additional needle (the average VAS score was 3.0±0.4 and 1.3±0.3 points, respectively; the average TVP scale score was 2.7±0.4 and 1.0±0.2 points, respectively, the difference is significant, p≤0.05). The doctors also assessed the devices used for puncture of the upper jaw. As a result of the study, the high efficiency and safety of using new original devices was established.